Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 04:12 PM Apr 2017

The Day the U.S. Strikes North Korea

The Day the U.S. Strikes North Korea
It would have to be big enough but not too big—enough to do damage but not enough to make Kim think we seek regime change. Not easy.
Tom Rogan 04.14.17 12:00 AM ET

For a start, the U.S. would seek to annihilate North Korean ballistic missile development and production facilities. Credible reports suggest many of these hardened facilities are in North Korea’s northeastern mountainous region, near the Chinese border. Destroying these sites would likely entail air strikes with the U.S. Air Force’s 30,000 pound GBU-57. The bomb is designed to penetrate deep below the surface and achieve significant effect. Open source reports indicate post-2012 efforts to enable B-2 bomber deployment of the weapon. Currently based in Florida and Missouri, B-2 crews can strike targets across the globe, refueling during missions.

The destruction of North Korean ballistic missile command and control elements would also be a primary objective. The Nuclear Threat Initiative lists a number of corresponding facilities, but the Sohae Station on North Korea’s west coast offers an obvious example. North Korean ballistic missile officers might also be targeted.

Regardless, the motivation of these strikes would be threefold. First, to degrade North Korea’s ability to deploy reliable solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missiles. Second, to deter a reconstitution of that program post-strike. Third, to assure North Korea that the strikes are not intended to destroy Kim’s regime.

This third point presents the greatest challenge for U.S. planners. After all, any operation would necessarily require significant force. To protect U.S. bomber crews and create durable strategic effect, the strikes would have to extend beyond the specific ballistic program. Strikes on North Korean command and control, radar and air defense assets would be necessary. Complicating matters is North Korea’s crude but mobile air defense network.

Learning from the Persian Gulf War, when static Iraqi defenses quickly crumbled under American air assaults North Korean air defense units are focused on evading U.S. targeting efforts. Identifying and destroying these targets would require many U.S. Air Force and Navy/Marine aircraft. Although Carl Vinson contributes to that effect, at least one more strike group would be needed. But if the United States were to target units near the DMZ, the North might believe the Kim dynasty is existentially threatened.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/04/14/the-day-the-u-s-strikes-north-korea.html
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Day the U.S. Strikes North Korea (Original Post) workinclasszero Apr 2017 OP
This is the biggest deal of Trumps life. underpants Apr 2017 #1
Recall that the North Vietnamese brought down B52s with modified SAMs BSdetect Apr 2017 #2
All hell will rain down on Seoul. roamer65 Apr 2017 #3
Yup, Truman said no workinclasszero Apr 2017 #4
1 million north korean troops would overrun south korea and take Seoul.... beachbum bob Apr 2017 #5
This will mark the beginning of the end of humanity meow2u3 Apr 2017 #6
This is what the estimate was in 1994: dalton99a Apr 2017 #7
We can wait...but every month it will get worse. Rustyeye77 Apr 2017 #8

BSdetect

(8,998 posts)
2. Recall that the North Vietnamese brought down B52s with modified SAMs
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 04:20 PM
Apr 2017

I assume that the NKs would have thought about that too.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
3. All hell will rain down on Seoul.
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 04:27 PM
Apr 2017

The DMZ won't be a DMZ anymore.

So what happens when the ROK retreat happens? Do the nukes come out?

MacArthur once almost used them in Korea.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
4. Yup, Truman said no
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 04:40 PM
Apr 2017

Now we have an ignorant pussy grabbing, draft dodging reality star ape making the life and death decisions.

God help Seoul and all who live there is all I can say.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
5. 1 million north korean troops would overrun south korea and take Seoul....
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 05:10 PM
Apr 2017

a first strike by US will start the war....and Trumps next move would be use nuclear weapons...and then we have it with China coming to N. Korea's defense

dalton99a

(81,512 posts)
7. This is what the estimate was in 1994:
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 05:29 PM
Apr 2017
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-fg-north-korea-scenarios-20170414-story.html
During an earlier showdown with North Korea in 1994, the Clinton administration weighed airstrikes to prevent North Korea from reprocessing fuel rods from its Yongbyon nuclear complex. The plan was scuttled after computer simulations showed that up to 1 million people could be killed by North Korean retaliation. The casualties could be even larger today because of new real estate developments in the northern suburbs of Seoul, Baker said.
 

Rustyeye77

(2,736 posts)
8. We can wait...but every month it will get worse.
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 05:41 PM
Apr 2017

imagine 5 years from now when they have ICBMs.

Sorry.

I hope China reads them the riot act.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Day the U.S. Strikes ...