General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNeil Gorsuchs very first decision on the Supreme Court was to let a man be killed
https://thinkprogress.org/neil-gorsuchs-very-first-decision-on-the-supreme-court-was-to-let-a-man-be-killed-67aedf3a6d93Thursday evening, Neil Gorsuch who occupies a seat on the Supreme Court that Senate Republicans held open for a year until Donald Trump could fill it cast his first public vote since his ascension to the high Court. Hours later, a man was killed because of Gorsuchs vote.
The case underlying that vote, McGehee v. Hutchinson, involved eight inmates that Arkansas hopes to execute in eleven days. As Justice Stephen Breyer explains in a dissenting opinion, the reason the State decided to proceed with these eight executions is that the use by date of the States execution drug is about to expire.
In recent years, state death chambers have struggled to obtain the drugs they use to execute inmates because many drug companies refuse to sell drugs for this purpose.
The Court handed down a series of orders denying relief to some or all of these inmates Thursday night, including a 54 decision in which Gorsuch cast the tie-breaking vote. Shortly after the Court handed down these orders, Arkansas executed Ledell Lee, its first execution since 2005.
(end snip)
Nice work if you can get it. /sarcasm off.
2naSalit
(86,634 posts)He's off to a really good start.
SticksnStones
(2,108 posts)Living the dream ~
(in case it's not obvious)
OnlinePoker
(5,720 posts)Directly and indirectly.
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)MineralMan
(146,314 posts)The consequences of that election will haunt us for decades to come. Forethought is a good thing. We should try it, I think.
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Sienna86
(2,149 posts)I was wondering if being pro-life in those instances would transfer to capital punishment.
Iggo
(47,554 posts)They're not even pro-fetus, because if they were, they'd be aaaallllll about free and comprehensive prenatal care for everyone.
But yeah, they're not.
The people who call themselves pro-life are pro-death-penalty, pro-war, anti-welfare, anti-foodstamp, anti-school-lunches...and, well, they are pro- just about everything that kills people and anti- just about everything that keeps people alive.
So yeah, pro-life? No, they're not.
(Okay, I'm done with my rant. Sorry about that. )
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Pregnant women and dying people don't get to choose. The right wing PTB will choose for them. This also applies to people on death row.
Iggo
(47,554 posts)dbackjon
(6,578 posts)HopeAgain
(4,407 posts)alarimer
(16,245 posts)But as Scalia said, even actual innocence isn't ground to overturn.
They are in a rush because the drugs are set to expire, which is a stupid and cruel reason.
mountain grammy
(26,621 posts)Guess so.
HoneyBadger
(2,297 posts)Make it 10? Ties are not always a bad thing.
Wednesdays
(17,377 posts)nt
MFM008
(19,814 posts)Better than sex for repukes.