Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(131,171 posts)
Fri May 5, 2017, 05:28 PM May 2017

White House Proposes Cutting Drug Control Office Funding by 95%

'When he was running for office, Donald J. Trump promised to rid America of the scourge of drugs, vowing to crack down on dealers and invest heavily in programs to get heroin and other opioids off the streets.

But on Friday, President Trump’s administration revealed plans to gut the 2018 budget of his Office of National Drug Control Policy. According to an Office of Management and Budget document obtained by The New York Times, the White House is proposing to slash the drug policy office budget about 95 percent, to just $24 million from $388 million. The cuts would mean the office could lose up to 33 employees.

The 2018 budget would also eliminate grant programs administered by the drug control office. Those include the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas program and the Drug-Free Communities Support Program, which, according to the document, the Trump administration thinks are duplicative with other federal and state programs.

Rich Baum, the acting drug czar appointed by Mr. Trump, expressed anguish about the cuts in an email sent to the office’s staff on Friday.'>>>

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/05/us/politics/white-house-proposes-cutting-drug-control-office-funding-by-95.html?

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Norbert9

(494 posts)
1. I'm not defending anything, but cutting $360 million and only losing 33 employees sounds
Fri May 5, 2017, 05:39 PM
May 2017

Weird, to say the least.

Does this mean they won't have the resources to enforce federal marijuana laws?

BeyondGeography

(39,384 posts)
3. He had single-issue voters who actually trusted him on this
Fri May 5, 2017, 06:11 PM
May 2017

Desperate parents taken advantage of by the con man.

Jno_Gilmor_

(127 posts)
4. I'm not sure I see this as a bad thing? The Obama adm. focused on treating addiction,
Fri May 5, 2017, 07:12 PM
May 2017

I see the Trump adm., particularly Sessions, advocating more for just locking people up.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House Proposes Cutt...