Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The feeble minded one claims its all a hoax (Original Post) BSdetect May 2017 OP
Lol BigOleDummy May 2017 #1
It's not official until it's denied. Turbineguy May 2017 #2
We already know he hates this job - never wanted to be POTUS FakeNoose May 2017 #3
You might want to consider changing that title loyalsister May 2017 #4
I think that complaint goes a bit too far, really. MineralMan May 2017 #5
Free speech does not meaning not receiving legitimate criticism loyalsister May 2017 #6
I voted no on the jury as well. By your definition "moron" and "idiot" would be hate speech as well Coventina May 2017 #7
Exploiting stigma is a way of perpetuating it loyalsister May 2017 #10
So you are arguing that Trump was the victim of hypocrisy? Coventina May 2017 #13
He wasn't a victim at all loyalsister May 2017 #15
So basically you are saying that anyone who describes someone as dumb, no matter what descriptor Coventina May 2017 #24
Dumb does not have the same history loyalsister May 2017 #29
Please list all adjectives that are now forbidden due to their prior usage at some point. Coventina May 2017 #32
That, I fear, is an ever-changing list. MineralMan May 2017 #35
Right, how, um stupid (am I allowed to say stupid?) of me. Coventina May 2017 #40
Well, I'm feeling rather simple-minded myself, right now. MineralMan May 2017 #41
That is not so, actually. Since you are referring to historical usages, MineralMan May 2017 #34
That connection does exist loyalsister May 2017 #36
"deaf and dumb" . I'm more familiar with the offensive use of dumb JI7 May 2017 #39
While the word can be and has been used in that way, MineralMan May 2017 #8
It is used to lump him in with stigmatized people loyalsister May 2017 #9
No, it was not used in that way at all. MineralMan May 2017 #11
So it was never used as an adjective to describe intellectually disabled people loyalsister May 2017 #12
You may want to put leftynyc May 2017 #14
You may want to do some serious selgf examination loyalsister May 2017 #18
You might want to employ a mirror. Thor_MN May 2017 #22
Believe me I do loyalsister May 2017 #26
You are not reading what people are posting, and substituting your feelings of what they said. Thor_MN May 2017 #30
I am a product of my history loyalsister May 2017 #33
Yawwwnnnn leftynyc May 2017 #43
Of course it was so used. MineralMan May 2017 #17
You think it does not conjur images of people with intellectual disabilities? loyalsister May 2017 #19
Intellectual deficits, not disabilities. MineralMan May 2017 #28
MM VERY clearly stated that it was once used, in the past, in that manner. NT. Thor_MN May 2017 #20
The point is the meaning of the word has not changed loyalsister May 2017 #23
In 77 years? NT Thor_MN May 2017 #27
Did the people who were called that cease to exist over the past 77 years? loyalsister May 2017 #31
It's stuff like this that encourages me to take long vacations from DU spiderpig May 2017 #42
"The feeble minded one" vs. "for Epileptics and Feebleminded" Thor_MN May 2017 #16
They refer to exactly the same people loyalsister May 2017 #21
Your example ceased to exist 77 years ago. Thor_MN May 2017 #25
People of color, people with disabilities loyalsister May 2017 #38
The language you are persisting ceased to exist a long time ago. Thor_MN May 2017 #44
Not any more, she isn't. n/t countryjake May 2017 #46
And whenever white supremacists hold absolute power... countryjake May 2017 #45
Lighten up MFM008 May 2017 #37

FakeNoose

(32,639 posts)
3. We already know he hates this job - never wanted to be POTUS
Tue May 9, 2017, 09:47 AM
May 2017

...and he has no clue how to do any of this.

When is the Republican Party going to finally admit this disaster, and just get rid of him?

Soon I hope.




loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
4. You might want to consider changing that title
Tue May 9, 2017, 09:49 AM
May 2017

Feebleminded is nothing more than a substitute for the most commonly used derogatory word thrown at people with intellectual disabilities.

MineralMan

(146,311 posts)
5. I think that complaint goes a bit too far, really.
Tue May 9, 2017, 09:53 AM
May 2017

I can't support that level of sensitivity about nomenclature, I'm afraid. i would have used the word, witless, but to each his or her own.

I just voted no in a jury on the post-starting thread.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
6. Free speech does not meaning not receiving legitimate criticism
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:07 AM
May 2017

That was hate-filled language when The Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded along with other institutions designed to enforce eugenics were created and it's hateful language now.

Feeblemindedness was an invented diagnosis presumed to be prominant among disabled people, people of color, and immigrants.

Coventina

(27,120 posts)
7. I voted no on the jury as well. By your definition "moron" and "idiot" would be hate speech as well
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:14 AM
May 2017

Both used to have specific definitions of states of mental ability.

No one who questions Trump's mental competence is making fun of disabled people.

His lack of intellectual capability is a choice to be an ignoramus, not something that was beyond his control.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
10. Exploiting stigma is a way of perpetuating it
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:23 AM
May 2017

The outrage over 45's ridicule was supremely hypocritical, because it took something that extreme for even liberals to see ableism as a reality.

Feebleminded does not refer to willful ignorance. It refers to people who were presumed to be inherently intellectually defective. This is not different from using the R word.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
15. He wasn't a victim at all
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:34 AM
May 2017

I'm arguing that people who seized on that event to exploit ableism are hypocritical when they are also avid participants when they want a handy insult.

Coventina

(27,120 posts)
24. So basically you are saying that anyone who describes someone as dumb, no matter what descriptor
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:42 AM
May 2017

they happen to chose, is engaging in hate speech?

Is that what you're saying?

Coventina

(27,120 posts)
32. Please list all adjectives that are now forbidden due to their prior usage at some point.
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:47 AM
May 2017

I'd like to see this list.

MineralMan

(146,311 posts)
35. That, I fear, is an ever-changing list.
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:52 AM
May 2017

It always will be. See my reply just above, regarding the word "dumb."

MineralMan

(146,311 posts)
34. That is not so, actually. Since you are referring to historical usages,
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:50 AM
May 2017

the word "dumb" originally referred to people who were unable to speak, as in "deaf and dumb." That was long ago, though. It has since come to mean "stupid." That new meaning was once considered improper because it had connections to a disability. That connection, however, no longer exists, since we have stopped using the word "dumb" to mean an inability to speak.

Words are interesting things. Language is an interesting thing. Language changes constantly and words continue to evolve in their meanings.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
36. That connection does exist
Tue May 9, 2017, 11:02 AM
May 2017

The response you would get if you called a deaf or hard of hearing person dumb would probably clarify that for you. I've seen it happen.

There was never a "new" meaning, but there was a different usage of the word dumb. Not being able to speak was presumed to be connected to a lack of intellect. I have never bought into the idea that the n-word has evolved either.

MineralMan

(146,311 posts)
8. While the word can be and has been used in that way,
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:17 AM
May 2017

it is not being used in that way in the original post in this thread. I have called Trump an idiot an a moron on more than one occasion. Those words, too, have been historically used to refer to people with learning or other disorders. However, like the word feebleminded, they are also used in other ways.

Donald Trump's intellect or mind, if you will, is indeed feeble. It is an accurate adjective when applied to him. He probably also suffers from narcissistic personality disorder. If I claim that he has that disorder, it is not to attack anyone else who might be suffering from some psychological disorder.

On DU, people use all sorts of descriptive words. Some of those are commonly accepted as words that should not be used to describe people we do not like. However, we cannot exclude every word that may have, at some time, been used in a negative way to describe groups of people.

In the case of this original post, the use of feebleminded to describe Donald Trump was merely descriptive of that individual and an apt description it was, too. I would choose a different word or words, but the original poster chose that one. No reference to some past use of the word in a different way was intended, I am quite sure.

MineralMan

(146,311 posts)
11. No, it was not used in that way at all.
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:24 AM
May 2017

It was used as a descriptive adjective that applied to that specific person, as I said above.

That you consider it to be bigotry does not necessarily mean that it was bigotry. That bigoted use of feebleminded has passed from common use in the English language. It is an antiquated term that is no longer used to describe people with learning disabilities or intellectual deficits. It was, at one time, but that time has long passed.

There are many archaic word usages that are no longer part of people's active understanding of those words. We need, I think, to be careful in assigning bigotry to the use of words that no longer are used in bigoted ways.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
12. So it was never used as an adjective to describe intellectually disabled people
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:26 AM
May 2017

Really, you want to make that claim???

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
14. You may want to put
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:32 AM
May 2017

me on ignore. I call degenerate donnie and his supporters imbeciles on a daily basis. That's also a word that's been used against the mentally ill. I have zero intention of changing my vocabulary because some people look for stuff to get offended by. Up to you.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
18. You may want to do some serious selgf examination
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:36 AM
May 2017

and reading. Bigotry is after all rooted in ignorance.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
26. Believe me I do
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:43 AM
May 2017

I would have been called feebleminded when it was widely used and most likely would have lived and died in one of those institutions. I have dealt with people such as those on this board who presumed I am less capable and less intelligent based on my disability. I have lived the stigma the the OP tried to exploit.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
33. I am a product of my history
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:49 AM
May 2017

and a lifetime of discrimination and bigotry. I am sensitive because of my history and experiences, and the way people defend ableism astounds me.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
43. Yawwwnnnn
Tue May 9, 2017, 12:06 PM
May 2017

You're barking up the wrong tree. I have no patience for those who look to be offended. This is the real world, sometimes you're going to get offended - suck it up. Just put me on ignore. It'll save you the trouble of having to see things that you don't want to see.

MineralMan

(146,311 posts)
17. Of course it was so used.
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:35 AM
May 2017

It is no longer used in that way, and has not been for quite a long time. That meaning of the word is no longer the primary meaning of that word.

It should never have been used in that way, and is no longer used in that way. It has reverted to its original meaning, which is obvious from the word itself. The institution to which you referred has not had that name since 1940, over 75 years ago.

Donald Trump can be accurately described as feeble-minded, feeble minded or feebleminded. His intellectual powers are, indeed, feeble in nature. It is correct usage to use words that accurately describe a person or thing. Dated usages of a word that are no longer current are really not relevant.

English, like all languages, changes over time. Words assume new meanings and old meanings fade from use. The simplest example of that is the word "gay." It's original meaning is no longer relevant in the English language, and passed from use sometime in the early 20th Century. It has also been used in a pejorative way, and still is, but is more commonly used as a simple descriptive word today.

There are a number of words that are, indeed, used primarily by bigots. That is truly unfortunate, because some of them are words with completely unbigoted meanings. We don't use them here on DU. But, there are also words that have been used in bigoted ways sometime in the past, but that are no longer used in that way. Some of those have re-emerged as useful words again in the English language. I suggest that feeble-minded is one such word. You disagree. A jury of DU peers, however, has decided that it is OK to use that word to refer to our dimwitted, deliberately ignorant President. And there it is.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
19. You think it does not conjur images of people with intellectual disabilities?
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:37 AM
May 2017

Words have meaning only because of how they have been used historically.

MineralMan

(146,311 posts)
28. Intellectual deficits, not disabilities.
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:44 AM
May 2017

As I pointed out above, the institute you referred to has not had that name since 1940. That's over 75 years ago. That usage of the term has long since not been used to describe people with disabilities on any sort of regular basis. The word now, in most people's minds, means what the original poster intended to say, to wit, that Donald Trump is a stupid man who does not think clearly.

That is demonstrably true. While you may have the historical use of the word in mind, the poster almost certainly did not. And with that, I'm done with this subthread.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
23. The point is the meaning of the word has not changed
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:40 AM
May 2017

It referred to people who were considered less intelligent then, and now.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
31. Did the people who were called that cease to exist over the past 77 years?
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:47 AM
May 2017

No. And we know our history and we know that ableism is real and particularly rampant in liberal circles.

spiderpig

(10,419 posts)
42. It's stuff like this that encourages me to take long vacations from DU
Tue May 9, 2017, 11:41 AM
May 2017

(Not you, MineralMan.)

There's a point where I'm afraid to post my obviously brilliant points because someone might be offended by an adverb.

Come on, people.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
16. "The feeble minded one" vs. "for Epileptics and Feebleminded"
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:35 AM
May 2017

One can clearly see that they are not the same usage, even though the same 12 letters are employed.

You appear to have a deeply personal objection to the later usage, so much so that it overlaps to the former.

Finding bigotry where none exists.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
21. They refer to exactly the same people
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:39 AM
May 2017

People who are considered inherently less smart than "normal" people.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
25. Your example ceased to exist 77 years ago.
Tue May 9, 2017, 10:43 AM
May 2017

While there are people older than 77, the subject of the usage you objected to was not alive in 1940.

They might be the same in YOUR mind, but not in minds of the average person.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
38. People of color, people with disabilities
Tue May 9, 2017, 11:06 AM
May 2017

and immigrants most certainly do still exist. The language refers to groups not individuals.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
44. The language you are persisting ceased to exist a long time ago.
Tue May 9, 2017, 01:31 PM
May 2017

It exists only in your perception, it passed from use long ago.

Notice that you are arguing alone.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
45. And whenever white supremacists hold absolute power...
Tue May 9, 2017, 01:42 PM
May 2017

it's those groups that they wish to deign as "imperfect" or inferior in any way who will suffer the most.

In my family, we've taken to describing this new president as "badder than a junkyard dog" whenever he comes out with another new declaration or appears in public.

In my opinion, the man has not exhibited signs of any mental illness, dementia, intellectual disability, or any other sort of disabling condition, and for others to claim such things is simply permitting his behavior to be compared to the many who do suffer those afflictions, a blatant insult to millions worldwide.

Our new president has bad intentions; he is nasty, offensive, deplorable, and corrupt, and more than anything, he is dangerous.


(my apologies to junkyard dogs, everywhere)

MFM008

(19,814 posts)
37. Lighten up
Tue May 9, 2017, 11:02 AM
May 2017

Me calling the creature a "maggot" does not denigrate all maggots .
When it comes to BLOTUS , he is "feeble" minded.
Actually.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The feeble minded one cla...