General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSlate "Republicans Tried to Make the TrumpRussia Hearings About Anything but Trump and Russia"
by Michelle Goldberg
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/05/08/republicans_stray_off_topic_at_trump_russia_hearings.html
Were in a moment of incredible political surrealism. On Monday afternoon, former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates testified before a Senate subcommittee about how, in two separate meetings, she walked White House Counsel Don McGahn through evidence concerning Michael Flynn, Donald Trumps former national security adviser. Flynn, she said, had misled the vice president and the American public about his own conduct in a way that rendered him vulnerable to Russian blackmail. She couldnt discuss what that conduct wasits classifiedbut it was clear she was referring to the content of Flynns conversations with Russias ambassador to the United States. To state the obvious, you dont want your national security adviser compromised with the Russians, Yates testified.
No Republican at the hearing challenged the assertion that Flynn was compromised. None suggested a defensible reason why Trump might have kept Flynn around for 18 days after Yates spoke to McGahn, firing him only after the Washington Post reported on his lies. The Republican senators simply and insistently changed the subject, over and over again. The hearing was officially about Russian Interference in the 2016 Election, but they acted as though the subject were actually leaks, or unmasking, or evenI swearHillary Clintons emails.
It was as if two different hearings were going on simultaneously. Democrats questioned the witnessesYates and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapperabout the subject at hand. Republicans tried to figure out who had leaked to the Washington Post, or why Yates had had the audacity, in her role as acting attorney general, to refuse to defend Trumps travel ban. (This led to a delightful exchange in which Yates humiliated Sen. Ted Cruz by showing that she knows more about the Immigration and Nationality Act than he does.) Cruz asked Clapper a wholly irrelevant question that was clearly about Clinton, her campaign vice-chair Huma Abedin, and Abedins estranged spouse Anthony Weiner: [W]hat would you do, at the DNI, if you discovered that an employee of yours had forwarded hundreds or even thousands of emails to a nongovernment individual, their spouse, on a nongovernment computer? Cruz tried, and failed, to get Clapper to say that such a person would be prosecuted.
Under questioning by Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar, Clapper attempted to focus matters: I understand how critical leaks are and unmasking and all these ancillary issues. But to me, the transcendent issue here is the Russian interference in our election process. And what that means to the erosion of the fundamental fabric of our democracy. And that to me is a huge deal. But as this hearing once again made clear, it is not a huge deal to most Republicans in Congress.
snip....more to read at the link.
Two important parts of the remainder
Unlike Republicans, Democrats are bad at imposing their version of reality on the country at large, even if that version happens to be true.
and
Thirteen years ago, an anonymous aide to George W. Bushlater revealed to be Karl Rovetold the journalist Ron Suskind, We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while youre studying that realityjudiciously, as you willwell act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and thats how things will sort out. Were historys actors ... and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.
(This really is utterly terrifying to me)