General Discussion

kpete

(71,993 posts) Thu Jul 5, 2012, 03:20 PM Jul 2012

BEHOLD!

http://www.balloon-juice.com/2012/07/05/i-have-so-got-to-get-the-poster-of-this/

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BEHOLD! (Original Post) kpete Jul 2012 OP

Ronnie the Raptur WCGreen Jul 2012 #1

I expected to see this guy hifiguy Jul 2012 #2

Herman Cain is gonna be pissed. nt DocMac Jul 2012 #3

I'm pretty sure that's photoshopped. nt auburngrad82 Jul 2012 #4

Ya think? HopeHoops Jul 2012 #6

Looks like they used Jim Caveizel for the body model... Tikki Jul 2012 #5

With any luck, the raptor will eat the fucker. Then again, they like live prey. HopeHoops Jul 2012 #7

Meh! Where are the feathers? longship Jul 2012 #8

WCGreen

(45,558 posts)

1. Ronnie the Raptur

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Thu Jul 5, 2012, 03:21 PM

Jul 2012

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)

2. I expected to see this guy

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Thu Jul 5, 2012, 03:24 PM

Jul 2012

DocMac

(1,628 posts)

3. Herman Cain is gonna be pissed. nt

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Thu Jul 5, 2012, 03:29 PM

Jul 2012

auburngrad82

(5,029 posts)

4. I'm pretty sure that's photoshopped. nt

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Thu Jul 5, 2012, 03:34 PM

Jul 2012

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)

6. Ya think?

Reply to auburngrad82 (Reply #4)

Thu Jul 5, 2012, 03:46 PM

Jul 2012

Tikki

(14,557 posts)

5. Looks like they used Jim Caveizel for the body model...

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Thu Jul 5, 2012, 03:37 PM

Jul 2012

At first I thought it was Jim flying by.
Just some kid in the basement's wet dream of ronny...

Jim Caveizel with...SHOCK!!!!....a gun.

Tikki

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)

7. With any luck, the raptor will eat the fucker. Then again, they like live prey.

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Thu Jul 5, 2012, 03:47 PM

Jul 2012

longship

(40,416 posts)

8. Meh! Where are the feathers?

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Thu Jul 5, 2012, 05:05 PM

Jul 2012

Terrible, unscientific rendering. The raptor should have feathers on it.

Reply to this discussion