General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOMG: Supreme Court strikes down North Carolina congressional district maps
The Supreme Court struck down two congressional district maps in North Carolina Monday, holding that the state had engaged in an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
The ruling is a victory for the black North Carolina voters who had argued the plans packed African-Americans in districts that already had a high percentage of African-Americans, thus diluting their presence in other districts.
As a result, the ruling sends the North Carolina legislature back to the drawing board -- with significant potential implications for the 2018 midterm elections. The state has been nearly split along partisan lines in recent statewide elections -- such as for governor and president -- but Republicans control 10 US House seats compared to only three for Democrats.
"The Constitution entrusts states with the job of designing congressional districts," Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the majority. "But it also imposes an important constraint: A state may not use race as the predominant factor in drawing district lines unless it has a compelling reason."
Read More: http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/22/politics/north-carolina-gerrymander/
This is great news for African-American voters in North Carolina!
longship
(40,416 posts)With a Dem governor, we'll see how far this can go.
Way to go, SCOTUS.
sheshe2
(83,771 posts)Wawannabe
(5,661 posts)Thanks sheshe.
sheshe2
(83,771 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)sheshe2
(83,771 posts)progressoid
(49,990 posts)JHan
(10,173 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)ck4829
(35,077 posts)Last edited Tue May 23, 2017, 02:54 PM - Edit history (1)
ms liberty
(8,577 posts)Not just the African Americans voters in NC.
sprinkleeninow
(20,249 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)LessAspin
(1,153 posts)LessAspin
(1,153 posts)sheshe2
(83,771 posts)calimary
(81,267 posts)WHOA! Those districts certainly were drawn - um - uh - "creatively."
I'm one who sometimes appreciates a plain ol' straight-line grid. Especially in cases like this.
LessAspin
(1,153 posts)Gerrymandering...
is kind of crazy.
7962
(11,841 posts)At least the 1st was attached to a bigger parcel
Response to sheshe2 (Original post)
lostnfound This message was self-deleted by its author.
mark fromelko
(59 posts)How did Gorsuch vote?
sheshe2
(83,771 posts)calimary
(81,267 posts)Yep - from the CNN story:
Two districts were at issue and the court split differently on its votes. In District 1, the legislature increased black voting age population from 47.6% to 52.65%. The court struck that map 8-0. The black majority voting population was also increased in District 12 from 43.7% to 50.66%. The court struck that map down 5-3.
Justice Neil Gorsuch didn't participate because he was not on the bench when the case was heard.
It STILL would have been voted down even if he had been able to vote on it. At best, that second map would have earned a 6-3 vote. At worst it would have been 5-4, so it still would have been struck down.
sheshe2
(83,771 posts)This is great news for NC, calimary.
Amaryllis
(9,524 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)This is great news!!
sheshe2
(83,771 posts)Thomas was the tie breaker!
Woot!
mcar
(42,333 posts)Hope lives.
iluvtennis
(19,861 posts)Ligyron
(7,632 posts)Fantastic result, honorable decision and didn't even need Gor-suck. Look at those two districts, I mean, come on?
We'll turn this country around yet, one victory at a time.
dchill
(38,497 posts)wildeyed
(11,243 posts)The NCGA maps are ALSO unconstitutional, yet they are still making laws. Like the budget that strips education $$ out of poor, black districts and siphons them into GOP leaning areas. How do they pay us back for that? And also, I want the 10 million hours I spent trashing them on Twitter, just since their December "special" session, back too.
It is so FUBAR, the only thing that would help is a freaking time machine.
Gothmog
(145,264 posts)redwitch
(14,944 posts)This actually gives me hope!
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)kacekwl
(7,017 posts)wildeyed
(11,243 posts)The are packing black voters into two districts that already elected black representatives when there was a lower percentage of blacks voting. As always, the NC GOP is 'fixing' a problem that didn't need fixing and conveniently benefits their partisan agenda. Sigh.....
If you want to nerd-out hard, check out Election Law Blog. There posts are way more nuanced than anything I read in MSM. This ruling is a big deal because it signals that SCOTUS might see party as a stand in for race in the South, which means that voting rights activists can go after PARTISAN gerrymandering under Voting Rights. Also, Thomas voted with majority and Kennedy did not.
BumRushDaShow
(129,028 posts)they can get this straightened out before the next census.
We have a similar issue here with more registered Democrats than Republicans in PA yet there are 13 Rs & 5 Ds in our congressional delegation thanks to gerrymandering.
sheshe2
(83,771 posts)We have a lot of work to do to GOTV!
rpannier
(24,329 posts)Those are great numbers
Pretty much sends a fairly strong signal to other states
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)"We can't win without it!"
SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,084 posts)He sided with the more liberal justices, rather than Roberts, Scalito and Kennedy. (Gorsuch recused himself--as he should for every decision from here on out.)
What happened to Clarence? Twinge of conscience?