Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 11:54 AM Jul 2012

CEO quits on day 1, gets $44 million for his troubles

CEO quits on day 1, gets $44 million for his troubles

by Rolandz

Sometimes I think we've lost our capacity to be truly shocked anymore.

This story is emblematic of so much that is wrong in this country.

From Think Progress:

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/07/06/512293/duke-energy-ceo-one-da/

Hours after new Duke Energy CEO Bill Johnson assumed his new position following the Duke/Progress Energy merger this week, he resigned his post. But Johnson can still qualify for up to $44.4 million for his time and effort

And they say government is wasteful! In fact, we're constantly being told that government could learn a thing or two about efficiency and financial restraint from business. That apparently means handing over gargantuan sums of money to people who walk in the door then walk right back out again.
The story continues:

Despite his short-lived tenure, Mr. Johnson will receive exit payments worth as much as $44.4 million, according to Duke. That includes $7.4 million in severance, a nearly $1.4 million cash bonus, a special lump-sum payment worth up to $1.5 million and accelerated vesting of his stock awards, according to a Duke regulatory filing Tuesday night. Mr. Johnson gets the lump-sum payment as long as he cooperates with Duke and doesn’t disparage his former employer, the filing said.

Under his exit package, Mr. Johnson also will receive approximately $30,000 to reimburse him for relocation expenses.

So as long as he plays nice with everyone he gets to keep the package. That seems an easy enough commitment to make for $44 million. I could learn to keep my mouth shut for that as well.

Here's another interesting statistic:

Grist calculates that Johnson’s pay package comes out to $5.5 million per hour, if he actually put in a full 8-hour day.

The "if he actually put in a full 8-hour day" is priceless.

- more -

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/07/07/1107160/-CEO-quits-on-day-1-gets-44-million-for-his-troubles


52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CEO quits on day 1, gets $44 million for his troubles (Original Post) ProSense Jul 2012 OP
It's Obama's fault. Sarcasm. warrior1 Jul 2012 #1
It was all worked out in advance so he would hand over the reins of power. xtraxritical Jul 2012 #45
Aww, he must have worked so hard for that n2doc Jul 2012 #2
And what will be done about it????????? 99Forever Jul 2012 #3
The private sector is doing fine. Fumesucker Jul 2012 #4
Mitt's kind of job creation. Best example yet I've seen Skidmore Jul 2012 #5
See? There's no recession. progressoid Jul 2012 #6
If you all could contain your outrage for a moment this is even stranger than it sounds... TreasonousBastard Jul 2012 #7
You're wrong - I'd turn it down in a fucking heartbeat demwing Jul 2012 #9
He didn't get any raw deal. bluedigger Jul 2012 #18
And Progress's employees are going to get fucked due to this merger. HughBeaumont Jul 2012 #38
Did he get a raw deal or . . . Springslips Jul 2012 #27
I figured it was something like that dixiegrrrrl Jul 2012 #29
The fact that a utility has this kind of money Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #47
Yup. Hissyspit Jul 2012 #48
Nice work if you can get it. CJCRANE Jul 2012 #8
Sounds like cabinet position material whatchamacallit Jul 2012 #10
Corporate CEOs are America's royalty (n/t) klook Jul 2012 #11
Do they need someone to run the shop tomorrow? bluedigger Jul 2012 #12
Now you know why they had to increase those energy rates and obxhead Jul 2012 #13
he must be a union thug to make so much money leftyohiolib Jul 2012 #14
Suckers, I would have shown up and quit for half that! AnnieK401 Jul 2012 #15
How on earth will businesses ever get good talent if they can't pay for it? HUH? Brickbat Jul 2012 #16
Now there's a "well run" company CanonRay Jul 2012 #17
The OP is completely wrong. former9thward Jul 2012 #19
Well, ProSense Jul 2012 #20
CEO compensation is out of control. former9thward Jul 2012 #28
Boycotting Utilities... neeksgeek Jul 2012 #35
Legislators deregulate electric Power. The people of a state can elect legislators that promise in DhhD Jul 2012 #40
Much of it is from vesting stock over the years prior as CEO Lucky Luciano Jul 2012 #30
You know, ProSense Jul 2012 #32
...but surely not based on 24 hours of work as the headline says. nt Lucky Luciano Jul 2012 #41
OK, let's give him that...much of it was from prior vesting stock. Curmudgeoness Jul 2012 #44
Often times senior management will write clauses in the merger contracts that Lucky Luciano Jul 2012 #49
Nice work if you can get it. CJCRANE Jul 2012 #22
Remember - we don't call them CEOs anymore ThoughtCriminal Jul 2012 #21
Well there was his replacement........ Smilo Jul 2012 #23
Fucking thieves!!!! The whole lot of 'em!!! Initech Jul 2012 #24
Interesting - this looks like one aspect of patterns at Duke that will gouge $$$$ from people suffragette Jul 2012 #25
Mitch Daniels and his henchmen probably have a hand in this too. LiberalFighter Jul 2012 #51
Bookmark this thread, boys and girls, for the next time some Repuke tries to argue that... Moonwalk Jul 2012 #26
I'm not a lineperson for Duke working in the heat Tsiyu Jul 2012 #31
In feb of this year mercuryblues Jul 2012 #33
Why can't this story become emblematic of real abuse in our system aint_no_life_nowhere Jul 2012 #34
Very simply because... TreasonousBastard Jul 2012 #50
You don't have to go to a rock concert panader0 Jul 2012 #52
Because he was fired sulphurdunn Jul 2012 #36
Greatest. Economic. System. On. Earth. HughBeaumont Jul 2012 #37
And all I got was a kick in the ass! Curmudgeoness Jul 2012 #39
Because they just pass the expense on to the consumer. bluedigger Jul 2012 #42
They don't suffer Tsiyu Jul 2012 #43
Anyone who thinks government is more wasteful than the private sector is speaking from ignorance Major Nikon Jul 2012 #46

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
2. Aww, he must have worked so hard for that
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 12:15 PM
Jul 2012

Much harder than the guy making min wage cleaning his private bathroom, for sure. So hard in fact that he will need a nice, long vacation to recover from the 24 hours of hell he must have gone through...

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
4. The private sector is doing fine.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 12:19 PM
Jul 2012

The Invisible Hand giveth, the Invisible Hand taketh away, all hail the Invisible Hand

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
5. Mitt's kind of job creation. Best example yet I've seen
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 12:23 PM
Jul 2012

of the hiring and firing practices of big money. We need an example of exactly this sort of thing associated with Mitt's big bidness experience and link the two.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
7. If you all could contain your outrage for a moment this is even stranger than it sounds...
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 12:26 PM
Jul 2012

Johnson, who was CEO of Progress, was promised the job running the newly merged Duke and Progress company and signed his contract a month or so before them merger was finalized.'

The day after the finalization, the board met in executive session and booted him out. There is much suspicion that this was the plan all along to get Progress to agree to the merger. NC AG and utilities board already have their noses deeply into this stinky deal.

Now, say what you want about CEO salaries and parachutes (Although I daresay none of us would turn any of the money down if we were good enough to be offered the job) this is not Johnson's fault or doing. A contract is a contract, and he made the deal in good faith. He was just given a fabulous fucking by the Duke contingent.

No, I don't really feel sorry for him, but he did get a raw deal after all is figured in.



 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
9. You're wrong - I'd turn it down in a fucking heartbeat
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 12:33 PM
Jul 2012

I'd take a sane salary, and negotiate to have the remaining funds used for an employee bonus program, or to supply day care for working parents, or better healthcare, or any number of the other things that 40+ million bucks could buy.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
38. And Progress's employees are going to get fucked due to this merger.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 01:57 PM
Jul 2012

We, The People and It, The Economy are paying for legalized theft, and nobody cares and nobody does anything about it.

Amazing.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
29. I figured it was something like that
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 01:28 PM
Jul 2012

since i had heard of the merger.
fabulous fucking..maybe
fabulous payout for a fucking....indeed!

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
47. The fact that a utility has this kind of money
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 04:39 PM
Jul 2012

to even have the conversation makes me sick.

How many go without heat in the winter to give them enough margin to throw that kind of money around.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
8. Nice work if you can get it.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 12:30 PM
Jul 2012

9.00am : "You're hired".
9.01am: "I quit".
9.02am: "My check for $44 million, please".

 

obxhead

(8,434 posts)
13. Now you know why they had to increase those energy rates and
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 12:41 PM
Jul 2012

why they couldn't afford to trim those trees properly before the storm.

former9thward

(32,018 posts)
19. The OP is completely wrong.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 12:58 PM
Jul 2012

He did not quit or resign. He was thrown out by the Board of Directors. Two companies, Duke Energy and Progress Energy, merged and Johnson was supposed to be CEO. When the merger was completed the directors turned on him and fired him. Talk about getting the facts messed up!

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304141204577510573797464712.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
20. Well,
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 01:01 PM
Jul 2012

"He did not quit or resign. He was thrown out by the Board of Directors."

...that certainly puts Duke Energy and $44 million dollar CEO contracts payable for nothing in perspective, huh?

former9thward

(32,018 posts)
28. CEO compensation is out of control.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 01:21 PM
Jul 2012

But I think a lot of compensation is out of control including athletes and movie stars. I don't have a good answer. It is hard to boycott a utility company.

neeksgeek

(1,214 posts)
35. Boycotting Utilities...
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 01:41 PM
Jul 2012

Yes, very difficult. I am seriously considering the purchase of some solar panels ASAP. Of course, this would be easier if I was not a renter.

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
40. Legislators deregulate electric Power. The people of a state can elect legislators that promise in
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 02:02 PM
Jul 2012

their campaign to re-regulate Power. Deregulation is a right wing frame of mind. So the public pays higher cost for electricity. That money goes to stock holders instead of going into Main Street. States with deregulated Power have high utility cost and lots of food banks, and other third world country equivalents. Texas is a good example.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
32. You know,
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 01:33 PM
Jul 2012

"Much of it is from vesting stock over the years prior as CEO"

...I'm sure there is justification for every CEO's compensation and executive parachute. It's highly likely the previous compensation was equally excessive.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
44. OK, let's give him that...much of it was from prior vesting stock.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 02:18 PM
Jul 2012

That still leaves "$7.4 million in severance, a nearly $1.4 million cash bonus, a special lump-sum payment worth up to $1.5 million...... and accelerated vesting of his stock awards."

So he was duped into the merger? So he thought that he would have a job? So he had prior stock options? So he was dumb enough to think that companies are fair and kind and will always treat people well? So he doesn't understand the corporate mentality?

How many here have had such a good deal when their company was merged? Anyone?

Lucky Luciano

(11,257 posts)
49. Often times senior management will write clauses in the merger contracts that
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 05:10 PM
Jul 2012

protect them in the event of termination. Otherwise, they would never go for the merger.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
22. Nice work if you can get it.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 01:05 PM
Jul 2012

9.00am: "Welcome to your new job".
9.01am: "You're fired!"
9.02am: "Here's your check for $44 million".

ThoughtCriminal

(14,047 posts)
21. Remember - we don't call them CEOs anymore
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 01:05 PM
Jul 2012

The proper term in GOP NewSpeak Dictionary is "Job Creator"

How many jobs did he create that day?

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
25. Interesting - this looks like one aspect of patterns at Duke that will gouge $$$$ from people
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 01:14 PM
Jul 2012

because in the end people will pay this through it being added to energy costs.

More energy and financial manipulation that costs citizens and benefits the uberwealthy .

Apparently Johnson was hired to get another company to merge with Duke, then ousted once that was accomplished. That nondisclosure requirement to get the payoff looks like an effective way to keep him from disclosing whatever he learned.

This clearly needs to be investigated throughly and if they've somehow managed to skirt regulations, then the regulations need to be strengthened.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304141204577510573797464712.html

The surprise dethroning of Duke Energy Corp.'s chief executive set off angry responses Friday, with former directors at Progress Energy Inc. saying they never would have approved the $26 billion merger of the two utilities if they had known what would happen with the top job.

~~~

The merger closed Monday, creating a utility giant with former Progress CEO Bill Johnson at its helm. Hours later, the newly merged company's Duke-dominated board met for the first time and threw Mr. Johnson out of the job. It replaced him with Jim Rogers, who had run Duke before the deal and was slated to become the merged company's executive chairman

~~~

Mr. Rogers, who was attending an event at the Aspen Institute in Colorado Friday, didn't respond to messages left on his cellphone. Mr. Johnson, reached on his cellphone Friday, declined to comment. His severance package, which a spokesman said could be worth more than $44 million, includes a payment of up to $1.5 million, but only on condition he not disparage Duke.

~~~

One of his marquee projects—an Indiana coal-gasification project called Edwardsport—is close to $1 billion over budget. State regulators are holding hearings on the company's plan to pass on $2.6 billion of the $3.3 billion in costs to ratepayers. Duke has been accused of exerting improper influence over state regulators in an ethics scandal and several executives departed. The company hasn't admitted any wrongdoing.







Moonwalk

(2,322 posts)
26. Bookmark this thread, boys and girls, for the next time some Repuke tries to argue that...
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 01:19 PM
Jul 2012

...the president should have business experience, as those in business know best how to run this country. Show them this, and ask them to explain how those running companies who do this (oust a CEO after a merger and lose $44 million for less than a day's work in the process) are fit to run a country. ANY country.

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
31. I'm not a lineperson for Duke working in the heat
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 01:30 PM
Jul 2012

Last edited Sat Jul 7, 2012, 02:03 PM - Edit history (1)


but I agree with all of the lineworkers who say: FUCK Johnson, FUCK Duke's "Pay Package," FUCK Duke and FUCK a system that makes this profane situation reality.

Now Johnsosn will become a lobbyist and hobnob with the millionaires in Congress and they'll all live like goddamned motherfucking useless pigs.

But we can't get a GODDAMNED $10/ hour minimum wage out of the same congress!!!!

mercuryblues

(14,532 posts)
33. In feb of this year
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 01:37 PM
Jul 2012

Duke Energy was approved for a 7% rate hike.



http://www.heraldsun.com/view/full_story/17319347/article-Duke-Energy-rate-increase-approved-for-N-C--customers


DURHAM – A rate increase for Duke Energy Carolinas’ residential electricity customers in North Carolina will go into effect early next month, following an approval made Friday by the N.C. Utilities Commission.

An order from the commission, dated to Friday, said a rate increase in which no customer class will receive higher than a net total 7.21 percent increase on an annual basis is “just and reasonable to all parties.”

Duke Energy had initially filed an application for a rate increase in July, according to the order. In November, the utility agreed to a settlement with the public staff of the commission that stipulated a lower increase than what was initially requested. The public staff is an independent agency that makes recommendations about public utility rates and service on behalf of the public.


Read more: The Herald-Sun - Duke Energy rate increase approved for N C customers

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
34. Why can't this story become emblematic of real abuse in our system
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 01:37 PM
Jul 2012

the way the bogus "welfare queen" story became a major talking point for years as a symbol of abuse of the system? In his 1976 Presidential campaign, Ronald Reagan told a completely made-up story about a woman who had bilked the system of over $150,000.

"She has eighty names, thirty addresses, twelve Social Security cards and is collecting veteran's benefits on four non-existing deceased husbands. And she is collecting Social Security on her cards. She's got Medicaid, getting food stamps, and she is collecting welfare under each of her names. Her tax-free cash income is over $150,000."

Reagan never named the woman and no one was ever able to identify her. Nonetheless, she's all the Republicans were talking about for years to brand people on welfare, especially black people, as frauds and abusers. The CEO in this story is real. His compensation is real. Payment to him must come from somewhere, and can only be made up by passing the costs on to the consumer. If he puts his money into off-shore accounts, he's sheltering it from taxes and expecting fellow Americans to make up the difference.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
50. Very simply because...
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 05:44 PM
Jul 2012

too many people dream of becoming a wealthy CEO and forgive them their sins while too few dream of becoming a welfare queen.

It's as tough getting people to care about stories of corporate money gone wild as it is to get them to care about rock stars, movie actors and anyone with a good fastball making millions. Those people are living our dream and don't you dare mess with it.



panader0

(25,816 posts)
52. You don't have to go to a rock concert
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 08:42 PM
Jul 2012

or a movie or a baseball/basketball/hockey game.
You do need electricity however.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
37. Greatest. Economic. System. On. Earth.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 01:54 PM
Jul 2012

Siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigh.

Dirty pool or not, a select few of us get a lottery for quitting after one day's "work"?

You GOTTA be shittin' me. How many people are getting fired to pay THIS out (from what I hear, LOTS)?

"Class Envy", my dick. This is legal THEFT and it's bullshit.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
39. And all I got was a kick in the ass!
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 02:00 PM
Jul 2012

Don't seem fair.

I would be really pissed if I was a stockholder in Duke Energy......and that is what I don't understand. Why are the stockholders in these companies not out to lynch someone?

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
42. Because they just pass the expense on to the consumer.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 02:08 PM
Jul 2012

All they have to do is apply for a rate increase to the regulatory board, which is comprised of former "experts" in the industry, like this asshat.

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
43. They don't suffer
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 02:11 PM
Jul 2012

They still get their dividend.

It's the worker for Duke who suffers, and the ratepayer who suffers.

Stockholders must NEVER suffer. That's why they're all thrilled to pay these obscene salaries, because they know the guys making these profane salaries will take care of the stockholder above all else.

Stockholders don't care if the workers are fired en masse or underpaid. They don't care if the customers are charged exorbitant rates. They don't even care if the company ends up folding.

As long as they get theirs and get out before it happens.

Greed, greed, greed. America runs on greed.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
46. Anyone who thinks government is more wasteful than the private sector is speaking from ignorance
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 03:11 PM
Jul 2012

A stint in government service is a feather in the cap of any young executive. There's a good reason why the private sector puts a high value on government experience. With the exception of agencies that serve the military, the entire government has to run extremely efficiently. Even in good times, no politician wants to increase funding to any non-military agency. More often than not, they are getting cut, and when they get cut they have to figure out new ways to complete their mission with less resources. That's why when private industry takes over a government service, the result is inevitably less service and/or higher costs. So government isn't less efficient. It's almost always more efficient.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CEO quits on day 1, gets ...