Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I was reading through the thread on Marxism... (Original Post) Archae Jul 2012 OP
Well, there is Cuba with national healthcare and free education. OffWithTheirHeads Jul 2012 #1
Valid point...it's lost it's position only because it caused their shunning from society. vaberella Jul 2012 #4
Cuba is not Marxist, according to what I've read. Archae Jul 2012 #8
corporations own Cuba? You're thinking of the U.S.A. OffWithTheirHeads Jul 2012 #14
It has never actually been modeled. vaberella Jul 2012 #2
Not that I am aware of ThomasP Jul 2012 #3
As a Trotskyist, I blame the Stalinist bureaucracy for this.......... socialist_n_TN Jul 2012 #6
Well, that second paragraph says a lot.......... socialist_n_TN Jul 2012 #5
You know one of the problems with that logic nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #7
You mean a socialist government? David__77 Jul 2012 #9
Read up on the Indian state of Kerala. Odin2005 Jul 2012 #10
Has a capitalist government ever worked? alcibiades_mystery Jul 2012 #11
Not pure capitalism, no. Archae Jul 2012 #12
Himeshima, Japan. girl gone mad Jul 2012 #13
I wonder where the Iroquois nation would have fallen into this question. OffWithTheirHeads Jul 2012 #15

vaberella

(24,634 posts)
4. Valid point...it's lost it's position only because it caused their shunning from society.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 07:21 PM
Jul 2012

If the embargoes were not in place maybe Cuba. The over zealous control of the media also does not allow it to fall into Marxism. Marx supports freedom of speech even if dissenting.

Archae

(46,337 posts)
8. Cuba is not Marxist, according to what I've read.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 08:41 PM
Jul 2012

One party rule, severe censorship of any dissent, Cuba is fascist.

vaberella

(24,634 posts)
2. It has never actually been modeled.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 07:19 PM
Jul 2012

Warped versions of communism have been put in place but policies have gone wonky. I am not a fan of Communism as I am of Marxism that I do not find interchangeable. I do not follow Communism as issued from the Communist Manifesto. But I do subscribe to about 99% of Marx's views in Das Kapital a truer framework of what he expected a nation to do. But then again...Marx strongly believed that it is not created based on governmental policies, but sort of organically manifests as Capitalism fails. I find the closest model of this would be Argentina post their economic collapse. That now, is true Marxism in small models throughout the nation. The nation had in it's policies for a Marxist development which attests to what Marx suggested Marxism would grow from.

ThomasP

(29 posts)
3. Not that I am aware of
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 07:21 PM
Jul 2012

The problem is that the countries that have tried it have generally been governed by less than honest people that see marxism as a tool for tyranny and oppression rather than a beacon of economic freedom and personal liberty. Sadly that fact has stained the ideology for the foreseeable future.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
6. As a Trotskyist, I blame the Stalinist bureaucracy for this..........
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 07:27 PM
Jul 2012

After it won the struggle for the soul of the Bolsheviks, it became the model for future Communist leaders.

I also think that the model actually ATTRACTED the types of personalities who WERE authoritarian anyway. It created a negative feedback loop as far as leadership was concerned.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
5. Well, that second paragraph says a lot..........
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 07:22 PM
Jul 2012

Marxist governments are always and LITERALLY "under the gun" from the time of thier installation by the capitalist enemies. ALL of them from the first one in 1917 on. That's going to warp what they're trying to accomplish from the get-go.

So the question might be able to be reframed as, "Can a Marxist government ever be ALLOWED to work as planned?"

And this comes from a Marxist who's most definitely NOT a Stalinist.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
7. You know one of the problems with that logic
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 07:29 PM
Jul 2012

is that by design they were under pressure from word one.

But at the risk of actually angering folks on the hard left (and the hard right), both are ideals, and both really do not work in the real world as advertised.

David__77

(23,421 posts)
9. You mean a socialist government?
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 09:16 PM
Jul 2012

All the "bourgeois democracies" are "Marxist" to the extent that they implement the reforms called for by Marx.

In my opinion, you cannot have a socialist government unless there is a socialist state. There are no socialist states presently, and the states governed by Marxist political parties are, essentially, capitalist.

Socialism requires a very high level of economic development, which, in my opinion, has not yet been attained anywhere.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
10. Read up on the Indian state of Kerala.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 09:17 PM
Jul 2012

Since independence the Communist Party has been in power there almost continuously and is extremely popular. Kerala has the highest literacy rates in India.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I was reading through the...