Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

titaniumsalute

(4,742 posts)
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 10:22 AM Jun 2017

Twitter - Is there a time when they say "Enough is enough?"

If I were CEO of Twitter I'd be a mess for knowing how our POS President uses the company for his gain especially with the whole "bot" situation. Isn't there anything that company can do to prevent these bots? Are they somehow complicit with aiding Trump and the Russians if they do not?

Can you imagine if Trump didn't have Twitter to spout off his bullshit?

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Twitter - Is there a time when they say "Enough is enough?" (Original Post) titaniumsalute Jun 2017 OP
Trump, is akin to malware on Twitter. n/t RKP5637 Jun 2017 #1
He'd use facebook. Or Instagram. MADem Jun 2017 #2
OMG, tRump on Grindr! RKP5637 Jun 2017 #3
They'll tweak their algorithms, and it may help for a bit, but Cyberwar is here and it is working.. jmg257 Jun 2017 #4
I agree they need to do sonething about the bot situation Phoenix61 Jun 2017 #5
The Saudis are heavily invested in twitter. Nothing will be done. MADem Jun 2017 #10
No, not as long as they make money off it. PSPS Jun 2017 #6
I wonder what will happen? Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2017 #7
a) His loud mouth is generating TONS of internet traffic... JoeStuckInOH Jun 2017 #8
Are you kidding? He's great for Twitter jberryhill Jun 2017 #9

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
4. They'll tweak their algorithms, and it may help for a bit, but Cyberwar is here and it is working..
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 10:45 AM
Jun 2017
As they tweet and like and upvote their way through social media, Americans generate a vast trove of data on what they think and how they respond to ideas and arguments--literally thousands of expressions of belief every second on Twitter, Facebook, Reddit and Google. All of those digitized convictions are collected and stored, and much of that data is available commercially to anyone with sufficient computing power to take advantage of it.

That's where the algorithms come in. American researchers have found they can use mathematical formulas to segment huge populations into thousands of subgroups according to defining characteristics like religion and political beliefs or taste in TV shows and music. Other algorithms can determine those groups' hot-button issues and identify "followers" among them, pinpointing those most susceptible to suggestion. Propagandists can then manually craft messages to influence them, deploying covert provocateurs, either humans or automated computer programs known as bots, in hopes of altering their behavior.
...
Social media companies are beginning to realize that they need to take action. Facebook issued a report in April 2017 acknowledging that much disinformation had been spread on its pages and saying it had expanded its security. Google says it has seen no evidence of Russian manipulation of its search results but has updated its algorithms just in case...

Twitter claims it has diminished cyberpropaganda by tweaking its algorithms to block cleverly designed bots. "Our algorithms currently work to detect when Twitter accounts are attempting to manipulate Twitter's Trends through inorganic activity, and then automatically adjust," the company said in a statement.


http://time.com/4783932/inside-russia-social-media-war-america/

Phoenix61

(17,006 posts)
5. I agree they need to do sonething about the bot situation
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 10:52 AM
Jun 2017

But overall his tweets have worked well for us. They got his travel ban blocked and they show what an absolute idiot he is. His past tweets are a source to prove what a hypocrite he really is.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
10. The Saudis are heavily invested in twitter. Nothing will be done.
Sat Jun 10, 2017, 06:52 PM
Jun 2017

If anything, they'd be more likely to shut off "the resistance" from twitter than Trump.

Fellowship of the Orb, and all..

https://qz.com/519388/this-saudi-prince-now-owns-more-of-twitter-than-jack-dorsey-does/

PSPS

(13,603 posts)
6. No, not as long as they make money off it.
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 10:55 AM
Jun 2017

Or, in Twitter's case, they hope to make money off it. For all their purported hand wringing and protestations of "we're giving it all we've got, captain!" Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc., have monetized their services in a way that makes them dependent on carrying (and, thus, encouraging) as much criminal and nefarious behavior as possible. Zuckerberg and his ilk can only be shamed into cleaning up their cesspools. Each one of them could put an end to this instantly is they wanted to. The first amendment limits the government's ability to do so, but it doesn't limit the owners of these services. But they have no shame and care only about where their next billion is coming from.

 

JoeStuckInOH

(544 posts)
8. a) His loud mouth is generating TONS of internet traffic...
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 10:59 AM
Jun 2017

They probably charge beaucoup bucks for advertisers to get ads on his tweet page(s).

b) You know the old saying about not giving people rope to hang you with? Trumps twitter page is supplying rope by crate. If twitter truly doesn't like the Trump Administration, they best thing they could do is let him proceed. Maybe even figure out a way for Trump to tweet more easily.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Twitter - Is there a time...