Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amaryllis

(9,525 posts)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:05 PM Jun 2017

Did you hear Ari just say on Rachel that Rosenstein can't oversee the Mueller investigation?

At the very end - last MINUTE - Rachel was interviewing Ari (he's one of the MSNBC legal guys) about T being investigated for obstruction- and he said that since Rosenstein was involved in the Comey firing, he will have to recuse himself from that investigation... Rachel basically said wait, what? and then they went to Lawrence. She told Lawrence she wished she had a lot more time with Ari and that this was completely new to her.

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did you hear Ari just say on Rachel that Rosenstein can't oversee the Mueller investigation? (Original Post) Amaryllis Jun 2017 OP
Yes, Rosenstein will have to recuse, elleng Jun 2017 #1
Rachel acted like this was completely new to her... Amaryllis Jun 2017 #3
Yes, Ari mentioned it a few minutes before end of the show. elleng Jun 2017 #8
How is it you knew this before Rachel! Or that she didn't know. She is so often first on this stuff. Amaryllis Jun 2017 #7
I sure as heck didn't know it, Amaryllis, elleng Jun 2017 #10
Oh, okay...I was like, how could Elleng know this before RACHEL? The top Russiagate Amaryllis Jun 2017 #11
HAD I kept up with things as Ari does, elleng Jun 2017 #13
Well...it is logical that he would have to recuse himself...I still wonder why Rachel seemed Amaryllis Jun 2017 #15
Not sure that this is good news GeoWilliam750 Jun 2017 #29
I think she'll do her job properly, elleng Jun 2017 #30
She could've done a whole segment on that little tidbit NightWatcher Jun 2017 #2
Got that tidbit 10 minutes before her show was over. eom a kennedy Jun 2017 #5
That's what she and Lawrence both indicated...like Ari just had to get that out before Rachel Amaryllis Jun 2017 #6
I thought recusal was a choice? SHRED Jun 2017 #4
It's a choice until it becomes a forced recusal. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2017 #32
Haven't heard Alan Dershowitz chime in with his two cents all day. oasis Jun 2017 #9
Good! No wonder I was able to stay on one channel. I did not realize it until now. BigmanPigman Jun 2017 #20
I thought that was already out there. Rosenstein had said that moonscape Jun 2017 #12
Well...that makes sense. But Rachel sure seemed surprised. I wonder why? Amaryllis Jun 2017 #14
Maybe because it hadn't gotten to that point yet? Mueller questioned moonscape Jun 2017 #16
I believe Ari's point was that if Rosenstein is indeed a witness for Mueller... FreepFryer Jun 2017 #17
THat's what I got too. Still, I thought there must be something new about it given both Amaryllis Jun 2017 #18
I think it's because we have been focusing on Rosenstein being the empowered one to fire Mueller... FreepFryer Jun 2017 #19
Well, we know what Rachel will be discussing tomorrow! And likely will have Ari on again. Amaryllis Jun 2017 #21
She's extremely intelligent, but not omniscient Generic Brad Jun 2017 #26
From what I've read, Rachel Brand had more Republican support than Democratic.. AntiFascist Jun 2017 #22
She's very conservative, but I don't get the sense she's a Robert Bork marylandblue Jun 2017 #24
Boente is the one who makes me nervous. President Obama removed him from the line of succession... FreepFryer Jun 2017 #25
I have read that It was a ruse...Obama did it to make Boente attractive to *45...betting that *45 MedusaX Jun 2017 #27
If so, wow. Just wow :) (n/t) FreepFryer Jun 2017 #28
Not much chance of that. Patterson Jun 2017 #31
I think Rachel was surprised because the WaPo article came out late this afternoon marylandblue Jun 2017 #23

elleng

(131,059 posts)
1. Yes, Rosenstein will have to recuse,
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:08 PM
Jun 2017

giving the 'supervising' job at DOJ to Rachel Brand.

Former Bush official Rachel Brand takes over No. 3 position at Justice Dept.

'In some ways, Rachel Lee Brand followed a traditional path toward a high-ranking position in the Justice Department: an internship with her senator, an Ivy League law school, a Supreme Court clerkship, a legal job in the White House.

But Brand’s journey to becoming the first woman to serve as associate attorney general, the Justice Department’s third-highest-ranking official, had some unconventional features. The daughter and granddaughter of Dutch dairy farmers, she and her three siblings grew up in small-town Iowa. Seven years ago, when she went home to visit her family during the tulip festival in Pella, Brand donned her wooden shoes and joined 2,604 others in the town as it set the Guinness world record for the largest Dutch “klompen” dance.

Brand, 44, who was confirmed this month, now has to navigate a much more difficult dance as she takes the reins of what is considered by many the most politically challenging job in the Justice Department. As associate attorney general, Brand manages the lawyers who litigate civil rights, environmental and antitrust issues.'>>>

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/former-bush-official-rachel-brand-takes-over-no-3-position-at-justice-dept/2017/05/25/75e3aa80-40bb-11e7-8c25-44d09ff5a4a8_story.html

Amaryllis

(9,525 posts)
7. How is it you knew this before Rachel! Or that she didn't know. She is so often first on this stuff.
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:13 PM
Jun 2017

Amaryllis

(9,525 posts)
11. Oh, okay...I was like, how could Elleng know this before RACHEL? The top Russiagate
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:16 PM
Jun 2017

expert! I misinterpreted your post...

elleng

(131,059 posts)
13. HAD I kept up with things as Ari does,
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:18 PM
Jun 2017

it's REMOTELY possible I could have figured it out, but I didn't; I'm just a RETIRED attorney!

Amaryllis

(9,525 posts)
15. Well...it is logical that he would have to recuse himself...I still wonder why Rachel seemed
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:23 PM
Jun 2017

so surprised.

GeoWilliam750

(2,522 posts)
29. Not sure that this is good news
Thu Jun 15, 2017, 12:55 AM
Jun 2017
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Brand

"Brand is the chairman of the Federalist Society's Litigation Practice Group and co-chair of the American Bar Association Administrative Law Section's Government Information and Right to Privacy Committee."

elleng

(131,059 posts)
30. I think she'll do her job properly,
Thu Jun 15, 2017, 12:57 AM
Jun 2017

regardless of her assumed politics. That's usually what we bureaucrats do.

Amaryllis

(9,525 posts)
6. That's what she and Lawrence both indicated...like Ari just had to get that out before Rachel
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:12 PM
Jun 2017

handed it off to Lawrence.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
32. It's a choice until it becomes a forced recusal.
Thu Jun 15, 2017, 10:03 PM
Jun 2017

But he wrote and signed Comey's firing letter, so no way could he avoid recusal.

I am surprised that Rachel did not know this, it has been in the MSM for a few weeks now.

oasis

(49,398 posts)
9. Haven't heard Alan Dershowitz chime in with his two cents all day.
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:13 PM
Jun 2017

Trump must really be behind the eight ball.

BigmanPigman

(51,623 posts)
20. Good! No wonder I was able to stay on one channel. I did not realize it until now.
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:37 PM
Jun 2017

Whenever I hear him (like Kellyanne, Jeffrey Lord, etc) my blood pressure skyrockets.

moonscape

(4,673 posts)
12. I thought that was already out there. Rosenstein had said that
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:16 PM
Jun 2017

if Mueller said he should recuse himself, he would - or something like that. Don't remember exactly. It was a week or so ago if memory serves, though I've lost all track of time since 11/8!

It seemed clear then, that it would be related to obstruction because of the memo and whatever related conversations Rosenstein and 45 had. I rather assumed it would get to that point because obstruction seemed like an obvious avenue to go down.

moonscape

(4,673 posts)
16. Maybe because it hadn't gotten to that point yet? Mueller questioned
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:24 PM
Jun 2017

Rosenstein already, and my sense was that it depended how what he learned from Rosenstein started fitting in with other parts. We don't know what the two of them discussed, and certainly neither of them would leak. But since Mueller has now expanded the people he's talking to, thus the leaks, it returns to that issue. Ari can't know for certain, but legally Rosenstein can't be both a witness and oversee the investigation.

FreepFryer

(7,077 posts)
17. I believe Ari's point was that if Rosenstein is indeed a witness for Mueller...
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:25 PM
Jun 2017

...(as expected) he will have to recuse himself from overseeing the investigation, as a prosecutor should avoid being the sole interviewer of a witness, being alone with a witness, or otherwise becoming an essential witness to any aspect of that investigation.

Amaryllis

(9,525 posts)
18. THat's what I got too. Still, I thought there must be something new about it given both
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:28 PM
Jun 2017

Rachel and Lawrence's reaction.

FreepFryer

(7,077 posts)
19. I think it's because we have been focusing on Rosenstein being the empowered one to fire Mueller...
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:35 PM
Jun 2017

...and this would mean he couldn't oversee the investigation. However, we oughtn't assume that Rosenstein would also recuse from managing Mueller, given Sessions' claim that he could still fire Comey despite his own (self-)recusal.

Amaryllis

(9,525 posts)
21. Well, we know what Rachel will be discussing tomorrow! And likely will have Ari on again.
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:41 PM
Jun 2017

I like him. He did a good job when she was out.

AntiFascist

(12,792 posts)
22. From what I've read, Rachel Brand had more Republican support than Democratic..
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:41 PM
Jun 2017

when she was confirmed. I hope she can remain non-partisan.

FreepFryer

(7,077 posts)
25. Boente is the one who makes me nervous. President Obama removed him from the line of succession...
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:49 PM
Jun 2017

...for a good reason I'm sure (wish I knew)! Trump's EO of March 31, placing the AG from EDNC in the line, is interesting.

(warning, whitehouse web site link: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/03/31/presidential-executive-order-providing-order-succession-within )

MedusaX

(1,129 posts)
27. I have read that It was a ruse...Obama did it to make Boente attractive to *45...betting that *45
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 11:37 PM
Jun 2017

Would un-do the EO and put Boente back in the line.

But who knows...

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
23. I think Rachel was surprised because the WaPo article came out late this afternoon
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:41 PM
Jun 2017

And it was a busy news day. A lot to digest at once.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did you hear Ari just say...