Fucking Greenwald

[SHRED]

No surprise here.


Glenn Greenwald: Donald Trump Jr.'s Emails Aren't a "Smoking Gun" or Evidence of Criminal Collusion

https://www.democracynow.org/2017/7/13/glenn_greenwald_donald_trump_jrs_emails

[alcibiades_mystery]

1. Greenwald is a Russian agent

The Intercept is a Russian propaganda organ.

[Eliot Rosewater]

9. He is an obvious one, we have some here who arent as obvious.

One is a very well known radio show host, liberal.

One is a very famous Senator.

[alcibiades_mystery]

15. Preach

[SHRED]

17. How long would he and his husband...

...last in Russia?

I hear Putin doesn't take to kindly to same sex relationships.

[Warren DeMontague]

2. Weenwald

[Johonny]

3. What do you expect from a pig, but a grunt

He's long ago burned any bridge to respectability with common sense liberals.

[Egnever]

4. Glad the mask is finally ripped off

Course he was the du darling for a long time. Funny how people can be fooled.

[MineralMan]

5. Are we still talking about what that turncoat fraud is saying?

How is it that we are not simply ignoring him? All of his fans are now posting on some other website. Maybe they're interested in Glenn's incoherent ramblings.

[OilemFirchen]

6. He's not a turncoat.

He has ALWAYS been a ratfucker.

[Warren DeMontague]

7. "You know, lots of politicians have paid thugs to break into and bug opposition headquarters"

It's certainly not the kind of thing that could bring down an administration.

[Blue_Tires]

8. Just collecting his check as usual...

I'm fucking done with Goodman and DN if all they'll ever be is Greenwald's personal PR arm

[maxsolomon]

10. They're circumstantial

Who said it was a smoking gun? it's the smoke.

[VermontKevin]

12. No. In fact, they are direct evidence of collusion by DJTJr.

Now, should we come to find out that others were in Trump Tower at the time of the meeting, that would be circumstantial evidence that they, too, had attended the meeting.

See the difference?

[Gothmog]

11. Who cares what Greenwald thinks?

[flamingdem]

13. Just earnin' his rubles

[Cicada]

14. Lock her up?

It is tempting to use criminal law against political opponents. Remember the chants of "lock her up?" I think we should be biased against that and require slam dunk evidence. VOX published the views of 17 law professors and not one thought these facts were slam dunk proof of a crime. 12 thought there was evidence of a crime but none thought conviction was pretty much certain. I think we should probably prosecute political opponents only when we are pretty much certain 12 jurors would all agree. Otherwise we could end up like countries who routinely jail those who lose an election.

We need something like the "better 10 guilty men go free than one innocent man go to jail" standard here too. To keep politicians from giving in to the temptation of jailing their opponents for political reasons.

[DanTex]

16. He really shows his colors towards the end of the interview when he talks about

Trump's nonsensical "something happened" statement about the Russian hacks. He bends over backwards to give the best possible spin on anything Trump or Trump Jr say.