Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Does the Kremlin Care So Much About the Magnitsky Act?
Lets get something straight: The Magnitsky Act is not, nor has it ever been, about adoptions.
The Magnitsky Act, rather, is about money. It freezes certain Russian officials access to the stashes they were keeping in Western banks and real estate and bans their entry to the United States. The reason Russian (and now, American) officials keep talking about adoption in the same breath is because of how the Russian side retaliated to the Magnitsky Act in 2012, namely by banning American adoptions of Russian children. The Russians vowed they were punishing Americans who violated the human rights of Russians, after an adopted Russian toddler died of heat stroke in a Virginia familys car. But the only Americans the bill directly targeted were the ones involved in putting the Magnitsky Act together.
At the time the adoption ban was passed, the Russian Federation had more orphaned and abandoned children than it did after the end of World War II, which claimed the lives of 27 million Soviets. Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev bemoaned the 95 Russian orphans whose American adoptions fell through just as the law was signed in 2012, 95 Russian orphans whom Russians didnt want to adopt. There was a massive outcry in Russia and thousands protested in Moscow against a bill that made no sense: If the Kremlin is so angry about the Magnitsky Act, why was it punishing Russians? And the most vulnerable Russians at that?
It was such an angry and nonsensical response that its worth looking at why the Magnitsky Act made Putin and the Russian elite so upset in the first place.
The Magnitsky Actor the Majinsky Act, as the presidents lawyer and his recently departed press secretary tended to pronounce itis named for Sergei Magnitsky, a lawyer and auditor. One of his clients, William Browder, was once the largest foreign investor in Russia, until the Russian authorities kicked him out of the country and allegedly began pilfering his investment fund, Hermitage Capital. Magnitsky uncovered what he alleged to be a complicated scheme by which officials from the Russian Interior Ministry and the courts used forged Hermitage documents to claim ownership of Browders fund, and then sued the Russian government, saying that they, the new pseudo-owners of Hermitage, had overpaid their taxes by $230 million. The courts and the Russian tax system, by Magnitskys account, speedily obliged, shelling out $230 million to the new owners, who then invested in luxury apartments in Moscow and abroad.
...
Last June, Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Russian lawyer, met with Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, and Jared Kushner to discuss restarting adoptions (in her telling). In reality, she was there to talk about undoing the Magnitsky Act. Speaking on a Russian political talk show in 2014, she railed against the sanctions being imposed on Russian elites for the Kremlins actions in Ukraine. The sanctions, she said, are just pretext to continue what they started in 2010, when legislation was first developed to impose sanctions in relation to the death of Magnitsky, to whom she referred as that poor boy. The Magnitsky Act was the blueprint, in other words, for the big sanctions that came in 2014.
The Magnitsky Act, rather, is about money. It freezes certain Russian officials access to the stashes they were keeping in Western banks and real estate and bans their entry to the United States. The reason Russian (and now, American) officials keep talking about adoption in the same breath is because of how the Russian side retaliated to the Magnitsky Act in 2012, namely by banning American adoptions of Russian children. The Russians vowed they were punishing Americans who violated the human rights of Russians, after an adopted Russian toddler died of heat stroke in a Virginia familys car. But the only Americans the bill directly targeted were the ones involved in putting the Magnitsky Act together.
At the time the adoption ban was passed, the Russian Federation had more orphaned and abandoned children than it did after the end of World War II, which claimed the lives of 27 million Soviets. Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev bemoaned the 95 Russian orphans whose American adoptions fell through just as the law was signed in 2012, 95 Russian orphans whom Russians didnt want to adopt. There was a massive outcry in Russia and thousands protested in Moscow against a bill that made no sense: If the Kremlin is so angry about the Magnitsky Act, why was it punishing Russians? And the most vulnerable Russians at that?
It was such an angry and nonsensical response that its worth looking at why the Magnitsky Act made Putin and the Russian elite so upset in the first place.
The Magnitsky Actor the Majinsky Act, as the presidents lawyer and his recently departed press secretary tended to pronounce itis named for Sergei Magnitsky, a lawyer and auditor. One of his clients, William Browder, was once the largest foreign investor in Russia, until the Russian authorities kicked him out of the country and allegedly began pilfering his investment fund, Hermitage Capital. Magnitsky uncovered what he alleged to be a complicated scheme by which officials from the Russian Interior Ministry and the courts used forged Hermitage documents to claim ownership of Browders fund, and then sued the Russian government, saying that they, the new pseudo-owners of Hermitage, had overpaid their taxes by $230 million. The courts and the Russian tax system, by Magnitskys account, speedily obliged, shelling out $230 million to the new owners, who then invested in luxury apartments in Moscow and abroad.
...
Last June, Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Russian lawyer, met with Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, and Jared Kushner to discuss restarting adoptions (in her telling). In reality, she was there to talk about undoing the Magnitsky Act. Speaking on a Russian political talk show in 2014, she railed against the sanctions being imposed on Russian elites for the Kremlins actions in Ukraine. The sanctions, she said, are just pretext to continue what they started in 2010, when legislation was first developed to impose sanctions in relation to the death of Magnitsky, to whom she referred as that poor boy. The Magnitsky Act was the blueprint, in other words, for the big sanctions that came in 2014.
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/07/magnitsky-act-kremlin/535044/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1201 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Does the Kremlin Care So Much About the Magnitsky Act? (Original Post)
CousinIT
Jul 2017
OP
It is about getting sanctions lifted on Russia, it is not the "adoption" crap
Thinkingabout
Jul 2017
#2
'Adoptions' ... such an obvious 'code word' ... just in case they were being recorded ... (n/t)
mr_lebowski
Jul 2017
#3
voteearlyvoteoften
(1,716 posts)1. Read this!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)2. It is about getting sanctions lifted on Russia, it is not the "adoption" crap
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)3. 'Adoptions' ... such an obvious 'code word' ... just in case they were being recorded ... (n/t)