General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMight America actually elect another black president in 2020?
(An opinion page from Deep Red Alabama. Almost 3,000 comments at link so far - and growing!)Source: al.com, by Roy S. Johnson
"It will be easier to elect the second African-American president compared to the first," he told me. "President Obama's two terms makes having a black president more familiar to Americans.
"Many Democratic voters look back very positively on his time in office. Even Republican voters who opposed Obama see the country made it through his presidency. Those two factors reduce the obstacles to electing a second black president compared to electing the first one."
Read it all at: http://www.al.com/opinion/index.ssf/2017/08/might_america_elect_another_bl.html#incart_river_home
bdtrppr6
(796 posts)"tough row to hoe". I'm all for it, no problem if they have the qualifications, just like any other candidate. But, seriously, good luck with that. I'll be surprised if we get another Dem, TBH. Kamala Harris will have the toughest time, Booker has been wishy washy most of his career- not sure of him, and Patrick I'm completely unaware of. We can hope though, can't we?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Kamala has that ability to be very likable when she's pissed off. That's a tight rope for most candidates and she's a natural. I like that she's a prosecutor who went after banks and drug dealers, and is a fierce advocate for women.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)And if she promises to freeze all Trump's assets before even charging him with a crime - my vote is a lock-in!
elleng
(131,196 posts)her heritage might become an immovable object, imo.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)They stayed home because HRC didn't inspire them. Kamala has a star quality, and no baggage at all.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)I really don't know what you're talking about.
elleng
(131,196 posts)California. She is the daughter of a Tamil Indian mother, Dr. Shyamala Gopalan Harris (19382009), a breast cancer researcher who emigrated from Chennai, India, in 1960,[9][10] and an African American father of Jamaican descent, Donald Harris, a Stanford University economics professor.[15] Her name, Kamalā, is feminization of the Sanskrit word Kamal (Lotus Flower / Nelumbo nucifera) that means "She of the Lotus", another name of Laxmi, the Hindu Goddess of prosperity whose seat is a lotus flower. She was extremely close with her maternal grandfather, Rajam Gopalan, an Indian diplomat,[10] and as a child she would frequently visit her family in Besant Nagar.[16] She has one younger sister, Maya, a lawyer and public policy advocate, who married Tony West, a former Associate Attorney General of the United States.[17]
The family moved to Berkeley, California, where both of Kamala's parents attended graduate school.[18] They also introduced their daughter to civil rights protests, which were common during that time in Berkeley.[18] Kamala's parents divorced when she was 7.[18] Shyamala raised her daughters in Berkeley, where the family lived in a predominantly African-American neighborhood and where the girls sang in a Baptist choir,[14] and they were also raised with Hindu beliefs. Her mother eventually moved the family to Montreal, Quebec, Canada, where Shyamala took a position doing research at the Jewish General Hospital and teaching at McGill University.[19][20]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)That background is a positive for me!
elleng
(131,196 posts)but who knows?
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)mcar
(42,402 posts)When I've seen him speak and do interviews.
I'm excited we have such a deep bench!
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Similar to the way people told Hillary to, which is unfair and all that, but I think kind of limiting. Kamala is the rare woman who's actually on fire and lovable when she's pissed off. I don't know where she gets it, but I know it's all too rare.
TomCADem
(17,390 posts)...Heck, McCain seems like a cool cucumber relative to Trump.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)TomCADem
(17,390 posts)...and Booker is even more even tempered. I am not sure we want someone who barely has a pulse to go up against Trump.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Friends who like him, hmmm. I'm talking about just the early impressions I think Kamala has incredible energy and tremendous personality. She's got the tough but cool thing. I think people will love her.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Someone recently reminded me about his speech at the convention:
But I've also said for a long time I think Harris is going places.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)About him to me- and I know the appearance of being genuine was so highly valued last year. People thought Trump was genuine because he showed us his ass so often, LOL.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Last edited Sat Aug 5, 2017, 08:31 PM - Edit history (1)
And very cutting while retaining a sense of humor. I think she has a rare gift. She doesn't ever sound scripted as so many do. And her questioning Sessions and others- she really cuts through their crap so well... I cannot wait to see her debate some GOPers. I think she's going to kill it.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Booker, a black man, is too well spoken?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I know what that's about. BTW, I like Booker a lot, have always defended him here.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Which is why I was so surprised to see it here.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)off your tongue.
Very telling, and completely dishonest when you know I said he seems polished and rehearsed when Specifically discussing his oratory. So yeah- I had context and you were playing an ugly little game. Disgraceful stuff.
Nice try though. LOL I see you, bro!
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)I, and others saw it.
You seem rather shaken up that you got called out, seems like a guilty conscience.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)a sickening little game, designed to shut down positive discussion about certain candidates. That's why you came into this thread, you had nothing positive to offer. Ick.
You unsuccessfully tried to twist my words into different ones and make me look bad. Why? Because I like candidates you don't? It appears so. You sure as hell weren't defending Booker- I doubt you ever would.
You put YOUR words in my mouth to try and shut me up and ain't no one falling for that crap. You were called out.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Intimidation and false accusations. No one could read what I wrote in good faith and make that leap unless they wanted to be disruptive.
I'm so disturbed to see this tactic used here.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Seems like this positive discussion really bothered you.
kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)No more macho assholes like Trump and Bush.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)I've been impressed with what I've seen from her so far.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I like Booker too, but as an MA resident, I really don't think Patrick would cut it.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Unfortunately Baine capital is more well known. What was he like as gov?
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)He wasn't bad, but there was kind of a smug, arrogant side to him that a lot of people didn't like. He seemed more like he was out for himself than a champion of the people he was supposed to represent.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)And some buzz that "Obama likes him" which of course wasn't a good thing.....
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I don't think you can really say anything unless you were here when he was governor.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Booker's my local guy, bit I'm excited about California's own, Kamala Harris. Her I have been following and I like what I see.
adigal
(7,581 posts)We lose again if she runs.
And maybe we should work on 2018 first??
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)ZX86
(1,428 posts)The most populist/anti-establishment candidate will win. Race, gender, or age, will not matter.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)People want change. The old days are over and they're not coming back.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)We are the majority and we're going to save the country from the morons who tried to make achievement, experience and competence dirty words.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)The most populist/anti-establishment candidate will win. Just like the last three elections. Race, gender, or age will not matter.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)ZX86
(1,428 posts)Most certainly.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Your argument apart. Obamas success has nothing to do w this hatred for the "status quo" that the bots have now rendered meaningless.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)Obama Touts His Outsider Theme
MANCHESTER, N.H. It has become clear, by now, that Senator Barack Obama is hoping to brand himself as the not-from-Washington candidate in the Democratic presidential race.
https://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/03/obama-touts-his-outsider-theme/
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)ZX86
(1,428 posts)The first Black President and all that.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)And "corporatist" labels by the same folks who smeared Obama with those labels. I'm not saying any of it was right, but it was there the whole time.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)It's a competition in the marketplace of ideas where opponents will use your associations (especially the moneyed ones) against you. Whether you think it's fair or not. This is not new. Our time is better spent on changes that will foster wins rather than intrinsic characteristics of political debate.
Caliman73
(11,752 posts)If you are espousing an argument about some trend in politics, let us know what that means so that we can at least know what we are discussing or debating.
Otherwise, ambiguous phrases like "the old days", "drain the swamp", "hope and change" can be anything.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)The days of Koch Bros picking the Republican candidate or the latest Hampton's society party choosing the Democratic candidate is over. That ship has sailed and it's not coming back.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)There was a time when the Democratic Party picked their candidate in back rooms. But for my entire life it has been the voters of the various states that have made that decision.
Do voters often pick people who have been loyal to the Democratic party, worked to make the party stronger and labored away at various offices and posts? Of course we do. It shows commitment to the party and its members.
I like Booker of the 3 mentioned here. He has a compelling story and has local and national experience.
But overall I am probably going to be a supporter of a Democratic Governor if they choose to run. I think they make better presidents all told and are often easier to get elected.
Have a nice evening.
Caliman73
(11,752 posts)When did that ship sail, never to return? Was it the ship that dumped all of the right wing supposed populists into congress in 2010 and defended in 2012, 2014 and again in 2016? That ship is gone for good now?
Do you think that Koch's are the only mega donors? You think that Trump was actually a populist candidate? He was backed by Sheldon Aidelson and the Mercer family who are also mega donors. Just because the one set of billionaires that we all know and love to hate, did not get their man into the candidacy, doesn't mean that Republicans are now in a new era. You also seem to forget that Trump had a special benefactor that is estimated to be worth over 200 billion dollars and though he may not have put dollars or rubles as it were, into the race, he certainly provided material support that was worth more than the few hundred million that the Kochs put into helping some national but mostly state and local candidates (they've shifted focus).
Democrats may be a different story, but that is debatable. We are a hot mess right now because we keep waiting on the perfect, pure candidate that has never voted on anything that someone might find offensive. We were so happy with President Obama, until he wasn't progressive enough, so we threw a tantrum and stayed home in 2010, during a census year, so that Republicans could rewrite the district maps. That showed us!! See, piss us off Hampton society set and we will stay home and our opponents will elect people who will...um lower your taxes, allow you to hide your money overseas, okay I know, they will overturn abortion rights so you will have to go to France or Switzerland to get an abortion which you could totally afford to do anyway.
Now, I am not that cynical as to think that we can't pull the Party to adopt more policy focused on the needs of the working class, middle class, and the poor. We have and we can, but this whole idea that we are having a revolution and are transforming the Party from the top down and will do it in the span of 18 months, is pretty ridiculous.
We need to start voting for progressive candidates for school board, for city council, for local and state positions, so that in time, the only candidates coming through the system are more progressive. That takes time. In the meanwhile, we need to get the candidates that will inch us closer to where we want to be. We need to get behind the best candidates available. We should be having discussions about what our values are, what we stand for, and what we need to have better lives, not just about "who is tainted by talking to someone from Goldman Sachs" or who supported some law (that is complicated) that my brother's wife's cousin's nephew wrote about in their blog, or worse, that some Russian ratfu@er is feeding us.
I don't mean to sound hostile, but this is something that has really started to weigh heavily. We keep fighting each other and doing our real opponents' work for them. These up coming elections are the prelude to 2020, and if we do not do something to win back control of state houses and at least get even or within distance for the census year in 2020, we could be looking at another decade of Republican rule by the minority.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)And it won't work in the future. The "We need to get behind..." and "Waiting on the pure candidate is bad" attitude is what is losing election after election. I don't care what business you're in or what product or service you're selling, you're not going to be successful by claiming, "We know this isn't really what you want but the other guy is worse".
The idea that instead of giving the people what they want we're going to reverse human nature and convince people to vote for candidates whose policies don't address their wants or needs is insane. The Ossoff is the perfect example. Millions of dollars spent and he lost. Clinton out spent Trump. She lost. Money does not win elections.
Mealy mouthed half measures delivered in a word salad filled with vague platitudes and weasel words DOES NOT WORK! How many elections do we have to lose before it sinks in. Doubling down on vote shaming will only lead to more losing.
80% of Democrats want Single Payer Healthcare. Now. Today. Where is Pelosi and Schumer? You seem to be saying it's too much to ask our leaders to reflect the will of the people. "Why don't you go vote for some school board members and dog catchers and who knows? Maybe in 10 or 20 years we might consider getting you some healthcare." That is inspiring no one. The rest of the western world has had universal healthcare for decades. Voters know this and behave accordingly. Mostly by staying home.
DoodAbides
(74 posts)ZX86
(1,428 posts)From what I recall they had to change the law to include term limits because he won so many elections.
DoodAbides
(74 posts)ZX86
(1,428 posts)I must have missed it. Far as I can tell people are still putting on their pants one leg at a time and FDR's economic agenda makes as much sense today as it did then. And it's just as popular.
DoodAbides
(74 posts)ZX86
(1,428 posts)It wasn't real.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Well, that is not the way I read history. One of the hallmarks of a populist is creating a boogie man and uniting people in fear of that boogie man. FDR's message was one of unity. He actually held off the populist by not finding a enemy to blame and punish for the depression. Populist pick out one group of people or ideas and rally their followers against that group.
Prior to FDR's election there was considerable questioning whether or not liberal, capitalist Democracy was sustainable. Stalin was consolidating power, Hitler and Mussolini had coming to power and they had followers on both the left and right in the US. Hell, FDR saved capitalism from itself according to many people.
Huey Long...now there was a populist.
Have a nice evening.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)And that's the point. Rejecting populism leads to electoral losses.
The Populism of the FDR Era
For all their demagoguery and for all the dangers they posed, these sundry movements were helpful in keeping Roosevelt's feet to the fire. "I am fighting communism, Huey Longism, Coughlinism, Townsendism," the president despaired at one point. To his aide Raymond Moley he vowed to "steal Long's thunder."
http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1906802_1906838_1908686,00.html
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)johhnydrama
(15 posts)My fear is that the common establishment believes that a POC is required to bring out the AA vote. Please don't write ANYONE off. Vote for the best candidate, not the candidate that most looks like you.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Trump pulled out more votes than Romney in 2012.
We went though this for the last couple years.
"Don't vote for a candidate JUST because she is a woman or a person of color."
We need to turn that around - "Don't NOT vote for a candidate just BECAUSE she is a woman or a person of color.
45 men and counting...
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)That is not a good sign for the current state of the Democratic Party. Not a good sign at all...
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Obama 2012 62,611,250
Hillary 2016 65,853,625
Romney 2012 59,134,475
Trump 2016 62,985,106
https://www.nytimes.com/elections/2012/results/president/big-board.html
https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president
I distinctly remember, Hillary got more votes than any white presidential candidate ever.
In just those 3 states that turned the Electoral College, rural Trump supporters came out of the wood work. And 3rd party candidates soared compared to 2012. But we won't talk about THAT.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)JI7
(89,279 posts)johhnydrama
(15 posts)The electoral college is the only thing that matters. Trump not receiving a single vote in California or NY would not have mattered. Conversely letting the south determine the Democratic candidate aka Super Tuesday isn't a good idea either because the south still isn't going to bring the Dems that many electoral votes. Virginia was a nice surprise.
crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)Electing a black president brought racists out of the woodwork and lead to a vile, racist, womanizing, lying, cheating reality TV star succeeding him.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)I'm out.
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)the opportunity to vote for a Presidential nominee/candidate with a last name like Chin or Hernandez or White Fox!
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Something about the subject has got Alabamians riled up!
I haven't seen this many comments since Auburn beat Alabama on a missed field goal with time expired!
CK_John
(10,005 posts)She is the only one who could go toe to toe with Trump because she is in the same line of work, non political and a TV reality person.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)I would have disagreed with you.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Someone else here argued he's such an asshole it doesn't matter if we run someone seen as ill tempered. Now I'm hearing it's going to take an oligarch to beat him. LOL.
Wow.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)johhnydrama
(15 posts)ok yes this was a joke.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)This is funny to you for some reason? WOW.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I like Harris, too.
I don't honestly know too much about Patrick, but Booker and Harris are both formidable.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)A "coalition" if you will of diverse, black students (diverse in ways beyond race) came to me in my classroom after school one day. The bravest, their spokesman I guess, came u and said, "Can I ask you a question? What would you do if your daughter brought home a black guy?"
"I hadn't really thought about it. I guess it would depend on the black guy, now wouldn't it?"
The kid goes back, confers with her associates, and says, "Ok. Best possible answer."
My point is: I guess I'd have to know more about this hypothetical black candidate. None of those people in the picture are "pure," but they'd all be a damn sight better than any Republican. I'd certainly like to see who'll be in the primary field.
(And the outcome of the anecdote? If you don't want to be faculty advisor for the Black Student Union, keep your damn mouth shut )
aikoaiko
(34,185 posts)An Obama candidacy was special but not unreplicable.
madokie
(51,076 posts)and I'm an old white guy. Our first Black President was awesome, need I say more?
Magoo48
(4,721 posts)Neo-liberal, corporate, and moderate Democrats are not motivated to tackle the dramatic, damage control changes our nation will need in a post 45 era.
DFW
(54,448 posts)For all I care. Competence, intelligence, humor, benevolence, honesty and stamina count. Race and gender do not.
I watched during the last election campaign in dismay as many so-called Democrats use every epithet in their book (corporate, corporatist, oligarch, war-monger, establishment, etc., etc., etc.) to trash our OWN nominee, in favor of the current nightmare. Next time, it won't be in dismay, but in anger, since we all now know just what kind of a nightmare can ensue.
David__77
(23,553 posts)I think she would make a great president!