Bravenak restricted by twitter
Bravenak---After going after Berniebros, Trump, and especially Susan Sarandon (with her army of sycophants) Twitter banned our old colleague for a week. Meanwhile, they keep Assange and upgrade him to 250 characters
I think there is something suspicious going on and probably money involved --Why? because their revenue and stock last quarter were terrible--It is possible that they have nefarious non-share holding donors. I'm just speculating but why does Sarandon & gang slide - while Bravenak is punished and Assange promoted (into the selected 250 character clique)?
I'd like to see Mueller includes their finances in his investigation
= new reply since forum marked as read
I can't quite see why you shared that particular link with me. And as a reply to my saying that Bravenak was a DU friend of mine. Was your intent to get me to dump her as a friend? I wouldn't do that.
So, according to you, something "really upset" you. Was it that I consider Bravenak to be a friend? Why would that upset you?
Actually, I remember the context of that post. I think it's interesting that it shows up in that link as a screenshot, only, rather than a link to the post. Maybe someone has a list somewhere of such things, to make it easy for people to post them. I know of lists like that. I've seen lists like that.
Anyhow, I suppose you'll drop back into lurking mode again, so I probably won't encounter your screen name again until something else "really upsets" you.
Post count credibility. That's always a sure-fire winner. 
....OP about her currently has 458 replies. Wish I was such a "nobody".
to you by...well big plus to you. I'm having so much fun watching the anti-bravnak/POC/outspoken woman crowd outing themselves...much fun Kudos to you...
back atcha.
Millions of people "fuck you" their way through Twitter -- are they all activists? 
that explains why they're restricting bravenak don't you know?
by you, does not make it true....she is somebody...to a lot of people. So your opinion, about her, really means nothing....
Hope your day gets better...
And we all know there's a desperate need for attention... Twitter's the perfect outlet. 
That's a real yuk, yuk, yuk......
the dying Rust Belt don't give a shit about *librul Hollywood* roaring for HRC. But somehow, they believe SS is powerful enough to bring down a presidential campaign.
Well, your bias certainly compels you to cast stones at Brave.
Sacred cows have an odd way of talking us into acting like the lesser of who we are when others don't see our cows as that sacred, divine and righteous... or even just viable candidates
Zero patience, indeed.
And probably never again here.
At least, not with that user name.
And before she was FFR here she threatened to have her male relatives beat up people on DU.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1576998
43. I could care less what ANY OF YOU thinks about my credibility after these anti black racist memes
That they pretent do not exist. They lack the credibility to ever be judgemental. I do care that people are harassing my family. And I think I know exactly who it is. Just let them know that if they keep it up, they will have somebody harassing them back and he is not nice like me and won't feel one bit bad after he stops the abuser from harassing him further. Even if he has to track them down and have a face to face.
Now read my sigline and listen to some music about my lifestyle.
And post his articles here. But I guess it's OK for some DUers to support him, just not OK for some DUers to support other members. Why is that, do you suppose? 
Given the light of the current topic of discussion, yeah, I'd say hypocrisy is the operative word.
would be summoned against Sarandon and her Twitter followers. But that's already been done (as well as the mystery letters)... it'll be something new and improved.
I just remember calls for the Postmaster General and Homeland Security to get involved.
It's all good . That twitter feed and some of the comments are hilarious.
follow her.
You've proven her right, again. She nailed it -- Susan Sarandon sic'ed her Twitter trolls on her. You keep validating bravenak...
bravenak's OP? The common denominator looks to be an obsession with her personally -- because of who she opposes.
YMMV. But there's an agenda to push and push they will...
it in my sig line. It's a tribute to him, his wisdom and his gentle humor.
Skinner is usually right.
Are we still believing that? 
Social media activism can be dangerous when it becomes attention-seeking, like they believe they've attained celebrity status or something. I'd advise her to just disconnect from the internet for a while and get some perspective on life.
a lot less had any belief or sympathy for her.There are screenshots of a couple of the messages posted in the Twitter feed.
person having other people on Twitter attacking poor innocent brav is pulled out of thin air. Throw shit you might just get splattered.
Classic persecution complex. It's almost Trumpish.
Not the other way around.
Her September 26, 2017 entry...genius.
I'm a big believer in when a person shows you what they are, believe them. She showed many times what she is. Here, Kos. redd it and other places where she has been banned or suspended.
Some people just don't play well with others .
Here or in other places. Lots of other places, even.
stand up people these days that offend the shit out of the likes of the Sarandon's, trolls, stalkers she has had to face because she speaks her mind. Civility does not work anymore for any POC standing up to the racist whites out there and in many of these internet forums..,..if a POC doesn't respond like many feel they should, they are either the new/old 'uppity' negro or a profane negro....fuck Sarandon and all who are on her boat....go Bravenak
...feet to the fire is all they understand...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
After all, she was also suspended here before.
Maybe it's a conspiracy and the FBI needs it to get to the bottom of it. .
But because of the rampant Russian propaganda on JPR, they will definitely be examining posters there. The investigation may spill over here because of posters who are posting at both sites. They do have bigger fish in Facebook and Twitter at the moment but it will happen.
The Mueller team is very meticulous.
Especially the 2nd, they didn't mean Bravenak! (Yes, extreme )
Especially pre election, if you looked to see all the tweets mentioning HRC, Obama, Kerry, etc you saw a HUGE number of retweets of Wikileaks related comments- as well as many tweets identically worded - probably from bots.
There were many times where I disagreed with Bravenak on issues, but it was completely obvious that she was a real person, who shared enough of who she was here to be credible. Her responses were never just repeats from someone else. Did they give any explanation of why she was restricted?
Was she simply restricted from reading and responding to tweets from Sarandon, Trump and Sanders? If it were that, I think that anyone can do that type of blocking. I suspect that it might be more useful for public figures, who do not have the desire or time to respond to the people responding to their tweets. Given the nature of many tweets, all public figures (other than Scott Brown) likely see that they do not want to get into a 140 character a tweet discussion with anonymous people.
By the way,
Facebook too once it started to catch on. They're both as complicit as the rest of the media, protests of innocence notwithstanding
But soon...very soon....
It will be Mueller time! And it will be glorious!
and its repression of the average Americans rights...Really!
But some seem to be VERY invested in the fate of an activist on Twitter that they don't even support.
Just saying...
Have a great day now.
...how clicking "Accept" to signify one will abide by the terms and conditions of a social media site actually requires a person to acknowledge the clear and perfectly reasonable rules set forth by the site owners and agree to follow them or risk getting ejected, amirite?
500,000 Rohingya have fled the Myanmar military after being targeted for ethnic cleansing. Babies thrown to the ground and having their throats cut, women mass raped and murdered. The media is not allowed access because pictures of dead bodies would make Mynmar look genocidal. All of this is happening because the Rohingya are a different ethnicity.
They're martyrs, not bravenak. This forum just thrives on drama but ignores real issues. I don't even bother posting a thread about it since it will just sink to the bottom like all the other threads with 0-6 recs.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10141864006
https://www.democraticunderground.com/113320424
https://www.democraticunderground.com/113320317
As you said, this nation is in danger -- not from Bravenak cursing at Susan Sarandon -- but from the people who are now in charge of our nation's government and putting us on the brink of a nuclear World War III that might obliterate us all. We have bigger fish to fry, IMO, than picking Bravenak apart when she's not even here to defend herself.
You are so totally correct. Such eloquence and insight. "set upon", that really nails it, too, as it was very apparent.
I have had my understanding of the anti-bravenak crowd here updated.....she's not profane, or a nobody or will she be silenced by the majority of people who hate her because she puts the truth about white privileged and entitled ameriKKKa out there. Many have 'outed' themselves, putting understanding of hate for Bravenak in clear and concise perspective, racially...thanks..
"one flying fuck" about how those on here with negative comments about Bravenak feel, Inconsequential is the operative word/feeling here on the 'victim's' of Bravenak's truth on white privileged, racist society. Not one flying fuck...understand? You anti-bravenak people outed yourself, I didn't have to do a thing. No threats to make you do it, no cajoling, you did it yourself... didn't have to do a thing...
sic'ed her trolls on her. That was exactly Bravenak's point about Sarandon's "two simple words."
and didn't resort to profanity or name-calling after Bravenak tried to be cute with her "fuck Sarandon" images. Two clever little words, outmaneuvering Bravenak (which she didn't like, cried foul, then played the victim per usual). Twitter is nothing but trolls, and SS and Bravenak followers went at each other - it's how the game is played.
"You take your chances," as Skinner has said. Bravenak took her chances on Twitter (and DU, for that matter) and it came back to bite her in the ass. But it's what she wants -- attention -- so brav-o, grrrrrl. Mission accomplished.
and you obviously agree with her because you are explaining it exactly as she described, lol. "Twitter is nothing but trolls" "It's how the game is played." That's EXACTLY what Bravenak was describing.
Susan Sarandon is a foul-mouthed internet troll with a following of trolls who attack people who dare to say anything about certain Senators. We all see what is happening. Following her to Twitter and elsewhere is the "game." It doesn't mean anything about Bravenak except that she is being targeted because she is obviously too effective with her messaging. Looks to me like she is the one "outmaneuvering" all her trolls.
Here's Susan being foul-mouthed:
Here's Susan trolling for Ralph Nader. Such a nasty troll she is -- wrong 100% of the time!
We know how she plays the game -- saw it first-hand on DU -- so, seriously, don't bother. She was outwitted and didn't like it.
"Fuck them".* Then she was harassed by Sarandon's trolls. We have seen it before, not just with Susan Sarandon. She was trolled to try and shut her down. That's the "game" you stated in your previous post. Looks like you know a lot about the "game" since you mentioned it and know it in detail. Looks like Bravenak has your number.
All your obsession with this is proving is exactly what she described -- people are following her to harass her.
*Here's Sarandon's foul-mouthed comment that was turned around on her:
God Bless the fan club!
outside of here means you are part of her fan club.
you try to make things about me instead of the obsession with bravenak and where she posts on the internet?
by trying to make it about me by suggesting that I'm obsessed with the "brave" one. I guess the next step is for one of us to cry foul and play the victim, like the master.
Like with Drumpf, I want her to keep posting. It's always entertaining when perpetually wrong loudmouths are set straight. Entertaining, but not enough for me to become active on Twitter -- the occasional tweet shared here at DU is enough of the drama.
You obviously care very deeply about what bravenak says and where or whether she is punished for it, so she obviously has your number.
She explained that the Twitter trolls would be coming for her, and she was right about that. You just confirmed here that you like to see her "set straight", so you admit again your pleasure in bravenak being followed. You just keep confirming with your own words about your interest in bravenak.
And she didn't "cry foul" -- that is just more intentional distortion.
response to Bravenak. Because, hey, vile racism and sexism are OK when you don't like their target, amiright?
Her post saying fuck Susan Sarandon was on her feed, but didn't @ Sarandon. It was some lame ass hater or troll who brought it to Sarandon's attention and then SS brought it to the attention of her horde. Who then went on the attack against Bravenak with a vengeance.
Fuck Susan Sarandon and fuck her horde of Twitter idiots. Bravenak will be back posting shortly and all they've managed to do is give her more attention and a larger following on Twitter. What a bunch of stupid, ineffective, idiot trolls.
Fixed it for you'.
