Will Romney's tax returns show that he was still at Bain after he "retired" from it?

[Th1onein]

I think so. And, I think, that's exactly why he doesn't want to release them. They will show him for the lying, job-outsourcing, middle class destroying, scum he is.

[pinboy3niner]

1. I don't think that's it

But I'll retroactively kick this thread anyway.

[MADem]

2. Of course it will--after all, his documents on file with the state of Massachusetts do.

Another Document Contradicts Romney's Bain Timeline
The Huffington Post finds yet another document that contradicts Mitt Romney's continued insistence that he ended his active role with Bain Capital in early 1999.

The corporate document filed with the state of Massachusetts in December 2002 -- a month after Romney was elected governor -- lists him as one of two managing members of Bain Capital Investors, LLC "authorized to execute, acknowledge, deliver and record any recordable instrument purporting to affect an interest in real property, whether to be recorded with a Registry of Deeds or with a District Office of the Land Court."

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/07/15/another_document_contradicts_romneys_bain_timeline.html

[NNN0LHI]

3. If that is all it was he would have released them already

There is more to it than that.

Don

[DrDan]

4. of course - that is why we are now hearing that he retired "retroactively"

[Motown_Johnny]

5. That and more.

How much he gave to his church compared to how much he paid in taxes for one thing. The possibility of his losses in 2008 being so great that he still made millions but paid little to no taxes that year is another.

Any involvement in businesses conservatives would not approve of is in the mix as well as tax shelters that most Americans would not approve of.


Lots of possibilities.

[ThomThom]

6. either that or he did not meet the residency requirement in Massachusetts

talk about cronyism... they knew he didn't live there and they let him run anyway
so he violated his contract with the Olympics

or he could be lying to his church and doesn't want them to know he shorted them on his 10%
or he could have sold the USA short in 2001 and 20008 with insider information
or just basic tax fraud, made more that he paid taxes one, took deductions he didn't deserve, hide income, failed to disclose etc.

I have questions.
500 page tax return for 2010? He has a lot to talk about and answer for.
He is the problem!