General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis is a brilliant piece by a small c conservative on the Alt Right
For decades, many of us took for granted that Americans shared the values that had been reaffirmed by Lincoln's "new birth of freedom." But the nomination of Donald Trump as the Republican candidate for president and his subsequent election to the office Lincoln once held ushered back to the public stage political ideas that had previously been rejected as unacceptable in a liberal society. The movement that has brought these ideas to the fore calls itself the "alt-right," and its members now populate influential right-wing websites, media outlets, and political organizations.
Unlike many white-supremacist groups of the past, the alt-right wishes to claim an air of intellectual respectability. In their article "An Establishment Conservative's Guide to the Alt-Right," Allum Bokhari and Milo Yiannopoulos insist that the alt-right is "dangerously bright," and that this intellectual sophistication is the "one thing [that] stands out above all else" when distinguishing them from "old-school racist skinheads." That intellect and not moral decency is the primary differentiator between the alt-right and skinheads should alarm anyone, but given their fervent desire to be treated as intellectuals, it may be worth reviewing the political arguments they believe are so compelling.
Some might say that directly addressing the alt-right like this affords them a legitimacy that their numbers would not otherwise warrant and that they do not deserve. But while they are only a small minority, the alt-right has already had an outsized effect on political discourse in conservative circles, and members of their movement are finding their way into the corridors of power. This newfound influence has also empowered those like the white supremacists who rallied in Charlottesville this past August, who see this moment as an opportunity to regain lost political power.
...
https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/answering-the-alt-right
I wholeheartedly agree with his thesis that Americans , left and right, are united by ideals and the Alt Right are united by blood and soil and that chasm can not be filled. Where I wholeheartedly disagree with him is where he exculpates Trump and most of his followers of the charge they are Alt-Right. They definitely are.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)GOP has been the party of racism since 1972 and the Nixon southern strategy.
The racists are not "finding their way" into conservative circles. Racists have been in the GOP for decades.
When a party's only goal is to destroy government that benefits the middle class to help their billionaire donors, that party has to find votes via stirring up hate -identity politics- and via lies. The billionaire wing and the racist wing of the GOP need each other. The billionaire wing and the racist wing are symbiotic.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Trump is the first president of either party to actively and consistently divide Americans by racial, religious, geographical, and national lines and to eschew appeals consistent with American deals. If his Republican predecessors flirted with racism and such he has coitus with those ideals.
Simply put he is a golem.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)The GOP created Trump with their racist appeals.
When a party spends billions over 40 years to tell Americans with dogwhistles that blacks and gays and liberals are holding them down, it is inevitable that a demogogue will come along and say that out loud.
If it wasn't Trump it would be someone else. The GOP's institutional racism and identity politics is at fault.