General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSessions speech to Heritage Foundation says religious expression overrides civil rights laws.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
**************
Sessions also says it's "not the province...of courts to say whether a policy is compassionate," in contrast to legal history
Link to tweet
underpants
(182,868 posts)Initech
(100,099 posts)They are out to undermine and destroy the very fabric of the United States so their billionaire backers can quadruple their already ill gotten fortunes. They are a terrorist organization with clear hostile intentions and they should be treated as such.
spanone
(135,861 posts)ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)Come tell us how you are being victimized by the mere existence of other people on this planet.
Initech
(100,099 posts)unblock
(52,309 posts)Stonepounder
(4,033 posts)"Thou shalt not serve Blacks" or
"Thou shalt not allow your wife to speak in this restaurant" or
"Thou shalt not allow Muslims in thy store" or ...
And this this is our Attorney General?!?!
unblock
(52,309 posts)And he's definitely not normal....
C_U_L8R
(45,019 posts)At least they're starting to admit it.
Initech
(100,099 posts)Alice11111
(5,730 posts)our chief lawyer, to model and enforce the Constitution.
He is really stupid, plus unaware of his own bias, that clouds his judgment.
It must be hard for real lawyers to work under him. It would be like watching doctors give shots to infect their patients.
I praise.those who stay to slow Sessions down or undermine him anyway possible.
angrychair
(8,732 posts)To the growing list I posted the other day:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029733638
As an atheist, I am in serious trouble and I fear what we are becoming every dystopian nightmare story Ive ever read or watched, comes to mind... but unfortunately I think some of these worst visions of the future will pale in comparison to the reality we will be forced to live in.
vlyons
(10,252 posts)down our throats, we wouldn't be so hostile. Ya think?
So tell us Jeff, does us saying critical things about your religion qualify as our free right of religious expression? Are we allowed to express our opinion that your religion stinks. Or as Marx would say, "religion is poison." That's Karl Marx, not Groucho Marx.
tulipsandroses
(5,124 posts)I have wondered if they apply these standards in other situations.
I'm an RN. I have had to provide care to child molesters and murderers. I am disgusted by pedophiles, but as a nurse, when they are admitted to the hospital, I don't refuse to take care of them. I have often wondered if the folks claiming these religious freedoms, refuse to service other people that they deem are committing a sin.
maxrandb
(15,349 posts)use Martin Luther King to defend their discrimination against others.
I think Napoleon was right when he said; "religion is what keeps the poor from eating the rich"
MiniMe
(21,718 posts)If you want to express your religion and you are Muslim, forget it
BootinUp
(47,179 posts)Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)The religious right republicans are our homegrown ISIS.
angrychair
(8,732 posts)malaise
(269,157 posts)OK then
IADEMO2004
(5,557 posts)malaise
(269,157 posts)This is madness
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Totally paving the way for a religious dictatorship in America.
BSdetect
(8,998 posts)kairos12
(12,869 posts)Solly Mack
(90,780 posts)world wide wally
(21,754 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)in a theocracy. Ask Saudi Arabian women.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,121 posts)We knew, some of us knew.
Docreed2003
(16,869 posts)Fuck you Jeff...your personal religion does not supersede the civil rights of any individual, no matter how much you might wish them to. This speech and the actions taken by the current Dept of so called Justice are appalling and an assault on everything this country is supposed to stand for. The evangelical right has been creeping and pushing their way into politics for far too long and its time to push back.
onenote
(42,748 posts)One the very first cases brought under the 1964 Civil Rights Act involved a restaurant that refused to serve African-Americans inside the restaurant (but would serve them with take out). The defendant claimed that applying the Civil Rights Act to make him serve African Americans would infringe on his constitutional right to the free exercise of his religious beliefs (such beliefs apparently being that the races should not be mixed). The Supreme Court gave this argument the back of its hand.
Sessions, apparently believes that was a wrong decision and that anyone claiming a religious ground for discriminating -- including discriminating on the basis of race or religion -- should be allowed to do so.
Asswipe.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)On social media and other public places.
I had heard at the time they even hounded the couples little girl.
On her grade school's website of all places.
DFW
(54,436 posts)He just violated that oath. I hope the press hounds him every day for this.
The only thing religious expression overrides is his judgment.
Let him go conduct the second round of the Spanish Inquisition on his own time, and leave the rest of America alone. What burns me up more than anything else is that these charter members of the God Squad don't believe one bit of the malarkey they are spewing out. They are only doing it for their audience, who seem to consist of the kind of person who goes to a Joel Osteen sermon and truly thinks he'll be a billionaire by the next Friday evening.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)DallasNE
(7,403 posts)Our Founding Fathers were mostly Deists. That is about one step away from being Atheist. The First Amendment was as much about freedom from religion as it was about freedom of religion. They wanted to keep government completely neutral on the subject and to that end they put in the Establishment Clause. It was only in the era of Justice Scalia where personhood was granted to corporations that an individuals First Amendment rights were infringed upon by a person senior to them - the corporation.
Here Sessions just takes it to the next level by saying government actions are subject to biblical limitations. In small steps the Establishment Clause has evaporated into thin air. Gone. The same things happened earlier with the Second Amendment where the "well regulated militia" language has evaporated into thin air and left us with the likes of Las Vegas and Newtown. That is the kind of damage the Courts can do as they systematically dismantle the Bill of Rights.