Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
Fri Oct 27, 2017, 03:31 PM Oct 2017

Both the Whitehouse and Zinke now saying...

Last edited Fri Oct 27, 2017, 05:46 PM - Edit history (1)

...they didn't approve the Whitefish deal.

Who the F did then??

ON EDIT
My initial thought was this contract needed Whitehouse approval and that Whitefish being Zinke's hometown it stunk.
Realizing now it is a contract separate from the Whitehouse I stand corrected.
I still think the "coincidence" of Zinke's hometown and Whitefish corporation needs to be vetted.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Both the Whitehouse and Zinke now saying... (Original Post) SHRED Oct 2017 OP
Lol. MrsCoffee Oct 2017 #1
Hopefully somebody kept an email exboyfil Oct 2017 #2
And, Zinke is likely lying through his teeth... n/t GoCubsGo Oct 2017 #3
Wow, a self-writing contract! gratuitous Oct 2017 #4
Imagine the deals when robots are writing the contracts delisen Oct 2017 #10
Illegal contracts don't get enforced. marylandblue Oct 2017 #11
Who has standing to void it? gratuitous Oct 2017 #14
That's a violation of federal law marylandblue Oct 2017 #17
Cant enforce an illegal contract Maggiemayhem Oct 2017 #18
Oh, and there will be cost overruns for sure. kacekwl Oct 2017 #20
Zinke is quickly making a name for himself as the worst actor in the cabinet. Orangeutan Oct 2017 #5
He was a thief back when MontanaMama Oct 2017 #19
The "it wasn't me" defense.... CatMor Oct 2017 #6
The buck just never stops anywhere world wide wally Oct 2017 #7
It was deal between the PR Electric Company and a contractor marylandblue Oct 2017 #8
This is going to fall apart quickly, it's pretty obvious. lagomorph777 Oct 2017 #9
The guy who funded Whitefish is a big Trump donor and was at his inauguration. octoberlib Oct 2017 #12
I believe the Puerto Rico electric company Angry Dragon Oct 2017 #13
Good, then nobody will care if it's cancelled. NT Bleacher Creature Oct 2017 #15
Zinke wouldn't have had any authority or reason to approve it Lee-Lee Oct 2017 #16
Don't need oversight just armtwisting. kacekwl Oct 2017 #21

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
4. Wow, a self-writing contract!
Fri Oct 27, 2017, 03:35 PM
Oct 2017

Too bad it can't be reviewed, audited or rescinded. What's done is done. The United States has no choice but the pay Whitefish $300 million, which is why they were willing to pull their 44 contractors out of Puerto Rico: Whitefish gets paid regardless.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
14. Who has standing to void it?
Fri Oct 27, 2017, 03:47 PM
Oct 2017

According to the contract: "In no event shall PREPA, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the FEMA Administrator, the comptroller general of the United States, or any of their authorized representatives have the right to audit or review the cost and profit elements of the labor rates specified herein."

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
17. That's a violation of federal law
Fri Oct 27, 2017, 04:28 PM
Oct 2017

So FEMA can say they refuse to reimburse the costs. Other contractors who could have done the work had they been given a chance can get the contract voided. In fact, if I were one of them, I'd be in court Monday.

Maggiemayhem

(811 posts)
18. Cant enforce an illegal contract
Fri Oct 27, 2017, 05:38 PM
Oct 2017

Remember ,they only had two employees at the onset. A bunch of scam artists trying to raid the federal treasury. I think there should be a call for Zinkypoo to resign.

kacekwl

(7,021 posts)
20. Oh, and there will be cost overruns for sure.
Fri Oct 27, 2017, 06:10 PM
Oct 2017

These guys had to give up too much in bribes so they will need to be made whole as they say.

Orangeutan

(204 posts)
5. Zinke is quickly making a name for himself as the worst actor in the cabinet.
Fri Oct 27, 2017, 03:36 PM
Oct 2017

Which is pretty tough to do.

MontanaMama

(23,337 posts)
19. He was a thief back when
Fri Oct 27, 2017, 05:50 PM
Oct 2017

he was a Navy Seal too. Dotard knew Zinke was a grifter...Birds of a feather...

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
8. It was deal between the PR Electric Company and a contractor
Fri Oct 27, 2017, 03:41 PM
Oct 2017

Zinke didn't have to approve it. He just had to suggest it. And I doubt he did it in an email.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
9. This is going to fall apart quickly, it's pretty obvious.
Fri Oct 27, 2017, 03:41 PM
Oct 2017

We all know the pattern now.

"That was strictly a local decision; it's highly inappropriate for you to keep asking about it."

"The P.R. governmnent asked for suggestions, and we gave them some."

"Yes, we told the PR gov't they should use our crony, but it was their final decision."

"Yes, we told them they had to use our crony, but that's perfectly legal."

"OK it would normally be illegal but it's not illegal if the President does it."

"Look! Over there! Some town just voted to remove a Robert E. Lee statue and that's horrible; our very fine white supremacist friends should go and do something about it."

"What contract? Are you re-litigating that again?"

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
12. The guy who funded Whitefish is a big Trump donor and was at his inauguration.
Fri Oct 27, 2017, 03:45 PM
Oct 2017

Both Trump and Zinke set this up.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
16. Zinke wouldn't have had any authority or reason to approve it
Fri Oct 27, 2017, 04:26 PM
Oct 2017

He's the Secretary of the Interior.

That agency has zero oversight over a contract signed by a utility company owner by a US Territory.

Why does anyone think that he would have any role in approving it?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Both the Whitehouse and Z...