Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
2. Yet we have DUers stating she shouldn't be touched
Sun Nov 5, 2017, 11:47 AM
Nov 2017

Look, she should have had a primary opponent in 2012. She got by that one, for 2018 she definately be challenged. We will likely get to the GE with her and a liberal. So basically a rematch of the primary fight.

 

greeny2323

(590 posts)
4. It's time for her to go
Sun Nov 5, 2017, 11:49 AM
Nov 2017

The party needs new blood, and in CA we should have nothing but the most liberal of liberal politicians.

PubliusEnigma

(1,583 posts)
6. Feinstein needs to keep her mouth shut. She has done zero investigation.
Sun Nov 5, 2017, 11:52 AM
Nov 2017

Why would she know anything?

She needs to leave it to Mueller and quit muddying the waters with her lack of information.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
10. Feinstein is the ranking D member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
Sun Nov 5, 2017, 02:31 PM
Nov 2017

She is one of the few members of Congress given access to the most sensitive intelligence.

 

shanny

(6,709 posts)
7. Didn't she also say the tRump could be a good president
Sun Nov 5, 2017, 11:52 AM
Nov 2017

and we should give him a chance? And that was just a few months ago, with ample evidence to the contrary. SMH indeed.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
11. I watched that interview.
Sun Nov 5, 2017, 02:36 PM
Nov 2017

I don't remember exactly what she said, but she didn't imply that there was no evidence.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SMH. This is not helpful