Do I have this correct about the Texas church shooter?

[misanthrope]

Devin Kelly was leaving the building, no longer in the act of firing when the other citizen, Stephen Willeford shot him? Is that correct?

If so, why are people saying Willeford saved lives? Kelly's massacre was complete.

[Nevernose]

1. Yep. Youre right.

And then he killed himself down the road a piece.

None of that fits the insane “guns save lives” argument/gymnastic feat, though, so it doesn’t get said.

[X_Digger]

2. Is there some indication he wasn't just on his way to somewhere else to continue?

It seems that unless there's some indication one way or another about whether the shitstain was ready to stop, both arguments are pure supposition.

[underpants]

3. No the story is that the shooter was already in his car

and the other guy chased after him in his car.

[struggle4progress]

4. Willeford has some NRA history

[oasis]

5. Why didn't he act sooner?

[Grassy Knoll]

6. Gun Defender's Perfect Landing....

[Aristus]

7. On another thread, the Good Guys With Guns crowd is asking us to ignore that

the guy showed up late to the party, and to celebrate the fact that he showed up at all.

I guess he wanted his share of the limelight...

[SCantiGOP]

8. Thats the only forum I have on ignore

And of the maybe dozen posters on my Ignore list most come from there.
If I interact with them it’s hard to resist wondering if some get a paycheck from the NRA.

[Hoyt]

9. I'm sure there were other armed folks in the church. Did no good. More guns is not

the answer, it's the problem.

[MLAA]

11. +1

[BigmanPigman]

12. Ted Cruz doesn't agree with you.

He has been saying so all day...what a god fearing, gun loving idiot

[jberryhill]

10. Someone must have figured out that a civilian shooting a fleeing suspect...

...is generally not a justified shooting.

[misanthrope]

13. Just maybe

http://www.al.com/news/mobile/index.ssf/2017/11/suspect_charged_in_october_rob.html