General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums(I'll get this started) TIME's Person of the Year should be....
WOMENFrom the incredible "Women's March"
To women finally being able to air their harassment stories - today was a doozy
To the female candidates in Virginia
To all the other incredible women (not that that's unusual) this year.
Apparently according to "bookies" it's
Emmanuel Macron #1
And Colin Kaepernick #2
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/4906012/colin-kaepernick-time-gq-nfl-magazine/
Irish_Dem
(47,402 posts)lamp_shade
(14,841 posts)jpljr77
(1,004 posts)Some juicy leaks have come out of the Mueller investigation, but I guess there is no resolution yet. Still, he has been mentioned so many times in the news, it just makes sense.
I know that Danica came into the broad public eye only last week, but holy moly is that story something else. And she had been engaged in it all year, so it could count.
unblock
(52,326 posts)remember that their definition is the person who has most changed the news for better *or for worse*.
whether or not it's an appropriate definition for that title, or whether it's an appropriate title for that definition, those are other questions.
because "person of the year" sure sounds like an honor, but the definition clearly states that infamy is just as good.
jpljr77
(1,004 posts)unblock
(52,326 posts)Blecht
(3,803 posts)Henry Kissinger
Blecht
(3,803 posts)Nobody else has had the same impact on the world this year.
He can join Hitler and Stalin as the biggest monsters to have been awarded the "honor".
On edit: I see that I am not alone in feeling this way.
Bradshaw3
(7,529 posts)Macron, meh. Kaepernick didn't even vote. The women from the March to the accusers who have come out to those who have won election deserve to be cited.
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)They're the ones that got us here.
TeamPooka
(24,255 posts)thought it was over.