Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
the internet before net neutrality in 2015 (Original Post) steve2470 Nov 2017 OP
The astute obsever will note all those things were prevented before the "Net Neutrality" rules... PoliticAverse Nov 2017 #1
ok...what are you trying to say ? nt steve2470 Nov 2017 #2
If you are going to argue that new (2015) rules were necessary to stop something... PoliticAverse Nov 2017 #4
in the past, it was on a case by case ad hoc basis steve2470 Nov 2017 #5
How were they prevented? NT enough Nov 2017 #3
This makes me realize RandomAccess Nov 2017 #6
We'll know it when we can't get what we have now FakeNoose Nov 2017 #8
No, there will be many things we're not even aware of RandomAccess Nov 2017 #9
My internet days are numbered bucolic_frolic Nov 2017 #7

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
1. The astute obsever will note all those things were prevented before the "Net Neutrality" rules...
Sat Nov 25, 2017, 08:24 PM
Nov 2017

of 2015 were instituted.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
4. If you are going to argue that new (2015) rules were necessary to stop something...
Sat Nov 25, 2017, 08:43 PM
Nov 2017

pointing out examples from the past that demonstrate the something was stopped before the new rules were in place
doesn't provide evidence for the argument that the new rules were necessary.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
5. in the past, it was on a case by case ad hoc basis
Sat Nov 25, 2017, 08:46 PM
Nov 2017

The net neutrality rule told ALL ISP's that they could not discriminate. No need for case by case decisions, only enforcement actions.

I'm not a lawyer, but I damn sure think there is a need for it, even though the FCC can still do enforcement if they chose to.

 

RandomAccess

(5,210 posts)
6. This makes me realize
Sat Nov 25, 2017, 09:31 PM
Nov 2017

there's a really strong possibility we won't KNOW what we're missing in many cases. Shit.

FakeNoose

(32,639 posts)
8. We'll know it when we can't get what we have now
Sat Nov 25, 2017, 10:06 PM
Nov 2017

Here's what will happen: If I have Verizon Fios and if they don't want me to stream movies from say, Netflix, they'll be able to block me from going to Netflix. Or they can make the download so slow that nobody will want it. Because I should be streaming Verizon movies and they can charge me for them.

It's going to be like that across the board, the bigger the ISP is, the more muscle they will have to push us around. They'll be able to spy on us and sell our searches and favorites to any advertiser and then steer us to the same advertiser. I already have Verizon Fios - it's lightning fast but they're watching every move I make. That's why I have a VPN. Pretty soon it will be like that for everybody.



bucolic_frolic

(43,171 posts)
7. My internet days are numbered
Sat Nov 25, 2017, 10:04 PM
Nov 2017

It's not as exciting nor as fruitful as it once was. I could benefit by limiting time to public Wifi access.

You grow beyond things.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»the internet before net n...