Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dalton99a

(81,513 posts)
Wed Nov 29, 2017, 10:16 PM Nov 2017

NYT - Lauer summoned another woman, bent her over... She passed out and had to be taken to a nurse

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/29/business/media/nbc-matt-lauer.html
NBC Receives at Least 2 New Complaints About Matt Lauer
By Ellen Gabler, Jim Rutenberg, Michael M. Grynbaum and Rachel Abrams
Nov. 29, 2017

On Wednesday, NBC received at least two more complaints related to Mr. Lauer, according to a person briefed on the network’s handling of the matter. One complaint came from a former employee who said Mr. Lauer had summoned her to his office in 2001, locked the door and had sex with her. She provided her account to The New York Times but declined to let her name be used.

In 2001, the woman said, Mr. Lauer, who is married, asked her to his office to discuss a story during a workday. When she sat down, she said, he locked the door, which he could do by pressing a button while sitting at his desk. (People who worked at NBC said the button was a regular security measure installed for high-profile employees.)

The woman said Mr. Lauer asked her to unbutton her blouse, which she did. She said the anchor then stepped out from behind his desk, pulled down her pants, bent her over a chair and had intercourse with her. At some point, she said, she passed out with her pants pulled halfway down. She woke up on the floor of his office, and Mr. Lauer had his assistant take her to a nurse.

The woman told The Times that Mr. Lauer never made an advance toward her again and never mentioned what occurred in his office. She said she did not report the episode to NBC at the time because she believed she should have done more to stop Mr. Lauer. She left the network about a year later.

(more details at link)
68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT - Lauer summoned another woman, bent her over... She passed out and had to be taken to a nurse (Original Post) dalton99a Nov 2017 OP
He is a rapist. Glimmer of Hope Nov 2017 #1
Sounds like he is. nt Blue_true Nov 2017 #4
That's a harsh judgement based on two paragraphs superpatriotman Nov 2017 #5
Doesn't seem like there was consent mcar Nov 2017 #6
Two paragraphs? Glimmer of Hope Nov 2017 #8
Very recent change by NYT editor dalton99a Nov 2017 #10
No wonder I was confused and had to read the article twice! Glimmer of Hope Nov 2017 #14
Post removed Post removed Nov 2017 #12
LOL CatWoman Nov 2017 #16
The opinion that the NYT is pushing fake news? Yeah, go with that.... bettyellen Nov 2017 #18
And he has a fucking button to facilitate it forgotmylogin Nov 2017 #44
Apparently that was a security measure for high profile people mythology Nov 2017 #49
What a creep. CanonRay Nov 2017 #2
Matt Lauer is a RAPIST!!!! Pachamama Nov 2017 #3
I wonder what the assistant knows and if he/she Ilsa Nov 2017 #7
Very pertinent question dalton99a Nov 2017 #11
This is Weinstein-level stuff. Good luck saving that marriage now, buddy! bullwinkle428 Nov 2017 #9
That is rape Hekate Nov 2017 #13
Sounds like he needs to be prosecuted. Nt BootinUp Nov 2017 #15
For which part? superpatriotman Nov 2017 #17
Statute of limitations bars prosecution of rape before 2006 Cicada Nov 2017 #55
This is nuts. She wasn't in a cabin in the woods. SharonClark Nov 2017 #19
64 year old female here. SamKnause Nov 2017 #21
It is sexual harassment in order to keep your job...you have sex with someone. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #28
The way it's described, I also don't think he could be prosecuted for rape, even if it happened LisaL Nov 2017 #48
Educate yourself about rape. yardwork Nov 2017 #24
This post is repulsive. johnp3907 Nov 2017 #34
64 year old female here; SamKnause Nov 2017 #20
Educate yourself about rape. yardwork Nov 2017 #23
This is not rape. SamKnause Nov 2017 #33
Were you there? Are you investigating the allegations? yardwork Nov 2017 #42
Were you ??? SamKnause Nov 2017 #45
Nope. But I'm not posting a smack down "This is not rape!!!!!" yardwork Nov 2017 #47
I am not posting smack. SamKnause Nov 2017 #51
There are lots of resources for you to learn about coercion and rape. yardwork Nov 2017 #65
You have a very low opinion of women if you think they would all unbutton their blouses. SamKnause Nov 2017 #66
What the hell are you talking about? yardwork Nov 2017 #67
Are you serious ??? SamKnause Nov 2017 #68
Honestly cannot believe these posts are real oberliner Nov 2017 #25
Believe it. SamKnause Nov 2017 #32
Bosses should not tell an employee to unbutton their blouse in their office oberliner Nov 2017 #41
Of course they shouldn't. SamKnause Nov 2017 #43
So what is the point of questioning the woman's actions? oberliner Nov 2017 #46
I don't understand why you would unbutton your blouse because SamKnause Nov 2017 #50
Coercion and intimidation are not difficult things to understand. LanternWaste Nov 2017 #57
Maybe it is you who is unable, or unwilling to understand. SamKnause Nov 2017 #59
I don't understand it either! Tracer Nov 2017 #58
I don't get it. SamKnause Nov 2017 #60
He did have a weapon Evergreen Emerald Nov 2017 #53
Good response. And it is reality. LiberalFighter Nov 2017 #63
Agree gollygee Nov 2017 #52
I think you have to be in the woman's shoes to judge her... HopeAgain Nov 2017 #27
Exactly right...no matter what, he is a monster...obviously a misogynist. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #30
Yes, he is a creepy asshole. SamKnause Nov 2017 #35
I don't get this story, either janterry Nov 2017 #29
Did Lauer have control over her future career? And her income? kwassa Nov 2017 #56
Lauer raped her. He didn't "have sex with her." He violently raped her. yardwork Nov 2017 #22
NYT has changed the wording dalton99a Nov 2017 #62
He should be arrested underthematrix Nov 2017 #26
Sounds horrendous, but I have a problem with trial by media when the accuser won't be named. Doodley Nov 2017 #31
I do, too janterry Nov 2017 #38
Koby Bryant was charged for doing this. Justice Nov 2017 #36
That's not accurate. Case didn't make it to trial because the accuser refused to testify. LisaL Nov 2017 #39
you are correct, will update. Justice Nov 2017 #40
Predators choose their victims- people they think will be vulnerable/compliant out of fear wishstar Nov 2017 #37
What a place to work! extvbroadcaster Nov 2017 #54
He got paid way too much. LiberalFighter Nov 2017 #64
It could have been rape or a medical condition? kentuck Nov 2017 #61

Glimmer of Hope

(5,823 posts)
8. Two paragraphs?
Wed Nov 29, 2017, 10:41 PM
Nov 2017

"Mr. Lauer had summoned her to his office in 2001, locked the door and sexually assaulted her.."

dalton99a

(81,513 posts)
10. Very recent change by NYT editor
Wed Nov 29, 2017, 10:46 PM
Nov 2017

The text I copied and posted above which read "locked the door and had sex with her" has been changed to "locked the door and sexually assaulted her"

Response to Glimmer of Hope (Reply #8)

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
49. Apparently that was a security measure for high profile people
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 09:48 AM
Nov 2017

He used it for that, but it seems like it was standard.

Pachamama

(16,887 posts)
3. Matt Lauer is a RAPIST!!!!
Wed Nov 29, 2017, 10:33 PM
Nov 2017

OMG.....hearing the story of what he did to this woman is horrific....this is rape....aggravated and even possibly violent....

I feel sick....

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
7. I wonder what the assistant knows and if he/she
Wed Nov 29, 2017, 10:40 PM
Nov 2017

covered for Lauer and helped set up circumstances for him to assault women.

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
55. Statute of limitations bars prosecution of rape before 2006
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 10:19 AM
Nov 2017

New York eliminated the statute of limitations for rape in 2006. Rapes before that had a limited number of years for prosecution.

SharonClark

(10,014 posts)
19. This is nuts. She wasn't in a cabin in the woods.
Wed Nov 29, 2017, 11:23 PM
Nov 2017

She should have screamed, someone would have heard her. Actually, she should have demanded he unlock the door when he asked her to unbutton her blouse. Instead, she unbuttoned her blouse. Acting helpless and being stupid plays right into the anti-woman narrative.

Demsrule86

(68,582 posts)
28. It is sexual harassment in order to keep your job...you have sex with someone.
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 07:58 AM
Nov 2017

It happens...and if you are single woman with kids to feed or you really need the money...some feel they have no choice...it is horrible and he needs to be fired...but what I have read isn't rape...almost though. He didn't act in a vacuum. The culture was created at NBC and they are to blame for allowing it. My husband worked for years in a male dominated industry and this sort of thing was simply not tolerated. There were rules in place and any who broke them were fired...from the lowest to the highest.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
48. The way it's described, I also don't think he could be prosecuted for rape, even if it happened
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 09:47 AM
Nov 2017

exactly as she described. It doesn't sound like she ever actually told him "no."

SamKnause

(13,107 posts)
20. 64 year old female here;
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 07:01 AM
Nov 2017

Mr. Lauer asked her to unbutton her blouse, which she did.

Why ?????????????????????????

Was she drugged ???

Did he threaten her ???

Did he have a weapon ???

Did she want to fuck him ???

I would have told him to fuck off.

I would not fuck someone to keep my job.

No job is that important.

Then he pulled her pants halfway down.

Did she scream ???

Did she scratch the shit out of him ???

Did she kick the shit out of him ???

Did she bang on the locked door ???

I don't understand this woman or her story.


Flame away.

SamKnause

(13,107 posts)
51. I am not posting smack.
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 09:52 AM
Nov 2017

Did he have a weapon ???

Did he physically force her to unbutton her blouse.

Were they on a deserted island.

She did it because he asked her !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why would you do that ????????????

I am sorry, I just do not understand.

yardwork

(61,630 posts)
65. There are lots of resources for you to learn about coercion and rape.
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 01:48 PM
Nov 2017

The standard of proof doesn't require being in a deserted island or having a weapon.

SamKnause

(13,107 posts)
66. You have a very low opinion of women if you think they would all unbutton their blouses.
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 01:53 PM
Nov 2017

Are you seriously saying you would prostitute yourself to keep a job ???

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
41. Bosses should not tell an employee to unbutton their blouse in their office
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 09:16 AM
Nov 2017

There is no explanation that allows for this not to be a fireable offense.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
46. So what is the point of questioning the woman's actions?
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 09:42 AM
Nov 2017

I'm not understanding the impetus behind your questions.

SamKnause

(13,107 posts)
50. I don't understand why you would unbutton your blouse because
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 09:48 AM
Nov 2017

your boss asked you to, or told you to.

Unless he had a weapon or physically forced her to unbutton her blouse I just do not understand.

They were in an office building with lots of people.

They weren't alone in an isolated area.

Couldn't she have said fuck you and walked to the door ???

It was locked.

Couldn't she have banged on the door ???

I am sorry I don't understand why she unbuttoned her blouse.



 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
57. Coercion and intimidation are not difficult things to understand.
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 10:30 AM
Nov 2017

"I don't understand why you would unbutton your blouse because your boss asked you..."

Coercion and intimidation are not difficult things to understand. I'm not sure if you're unable, or simply unwilling to understand as much.

SamKnause

(13,107 posts)
59. Maybe it is you who is unable, or unwilling to understand.
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 10:50 AM
Nov 2017

You seem to think all women are weak and mousy.

I would not unbutton my blouse because my boss told me to.

It is not that hard to understand.

If I had to fuck to get a paycheck, I think leaving that job would be a plus.

Tracer

(2,769 posts)
58. I don't understand it either!
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 10:44 AM
Nov 2017

Seemingly, without hesitation, this woman voluntarily took off her blouse.

What on earth was she thinking?

Everyone else on this thread has their crystal ball out, knowing precisely how fearful of retribution she'd be if she resisted Lauer.

Evergreen Emerald

(13,069 posts)
53. He did have a weapon
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 10:01 AM
Nov 2017

His power over her livelihood; his power over her career, over her ability to feed her family. He wielded that power as if it were a sword.

It astounds me that people are still dissecting the actions of the victim. "Why didn't she scream?" "Why didn't she insist that the let her out of the locked room?" Perhaps she feared his power.

Instead of focusing on why she let him get away with it, let's dissect the actions of the perpetrator.

LiberalFighter

(50,942 posts)
63. Good response. And it is reality.
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 11:03 AM
Nov 2017

Another human response in a situation like this because it is behavior you don't expect from them is being stun.

Then there is the aftershock with thoughts going through their mind of what they could do. In most cases they would think that if they say or do anything something could happen to them or they won't be believed. The shame they would have if they reported what happened. Either because people didn't believe it or they think that she let him do it.

HopeAgain

(4,407 posts)
27. I think you have to be in the woman's shoes to judge her...
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 07:57 AM
Nov 2017

But at best, this guy is a creepy asshole. Isn't he married? It's enough I don't want to watch this jerk on my TV.

Demsrule86

(68,582 posts)
30. Exactly right...no matter what, he is a monster...obviously a misogynist.
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 08:00 AM
Nov 2017

I never liked him and am glad he is gone.

 

janterry

(4,429 posts)
29. I don't get this story, either
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 07:59 AM
Nov 2017

and then 'passed out?'

He certainly used his power and manipulated her/the situation.

But I don't get this story. I'd have to hear more.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
56. Did Lauer have control over her future career? And her income?
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 10:30 AM
Nov 2017

Could he ruin her name in the news business, so that she would never again find a job?

dalton99a

(81,513 posts)
62. NYT has changed the wording
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 10:57 AM
Nov 2017
"locked the door and had sex with her" is now "locked the door and sexually assaulted her"
 

janterry

(4,429 posts)
38. I do, too
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 08:18 AM
Nov 2017

I think the time for not naming the woman (in most cases, woman) has - nearly? - passed.

It was important 20, 30 and especially 40 years ago. But we are in a new era. I think that women should agree to come forward. I'm nearly at the point (though not quite where you are) where I think women have to come forward.

IDK. Perhaps the time really is now.............

wishstar

(5,270 posts)
37. Predators choose their victims- people they think will be vulnerable/compliant out of fear
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 08:16 AM
Nov 2017

They don't usually victimize older more assertive people who have connections and ability to speak out without losing their jobs. Instead they target younger victims with less experience and less job security who are intimidated by powerful men and afraid to speak out and fight back

My first supervisor fits the profile- older white male who only seriously hit on new employees who didn't know other employees and were in their probationary periods where a bad evaluation could cause them to lose their jobs. My supervisor successfully deflected some serious accusations because of his Matt Lauerish habit of flirting and milder sexual joking around with those he did not ever seriously assault, so those colleagues would come to his defense thinking he was just a harmless flirt.

extvbroadcaster

(343 posts)
54. What a place to work!
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 10:14 AM
Nov 2017

Matt was making about 20 million a year. Just figure a million and a half a month. No holidays and he has to have time off. So maybe it comes out to 80 grand or so a work day. He gets up, goes to NBC, everybody kisses his ass, he does some lame TV show, goes back to his office, bends some young woman over for a quickie, then back home. 80 grand or more for that day. A coal miner that Trump loves so much would be lucky to make that in a year in dangerous work. Matt gets to bang some woman at work, and earn the miners salary in a day. Something is very wrong with how we compensate work in this country.

LiberalFighter

(50,942 posts)
64. He got paid way too much.
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 11:05 AM
Nov 2017

Anyone that got paid as much as he did in the business was paid too much in my opinion.

kentuck

(111,098 posts)
61. It could have been rape or a medical condition?
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 10:53 AM
Nov 2017

Something is seriously wrong when a woman is lying unconscious on your office floor.

It doesn't matter if it "seemed" consensual. Or if it was "consensual".

It is easy to blame the young woman. It is easy for the young woman to blame herself. The person to blame is the one committing the assault.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT - Lauer summoned anot...