General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDT has been taking a wrecking ball to the "Establishment." As he often reminds us.
To the State Department, to the FDA, to the EPA, and on and on and on.
Are we happy now?
Because that's what we wanted, right? To dismantle the "establishment"?
DT is doing just what so many on the right and the left called for.
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)That's throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Our established Democracy was a good thing, that people should have been working to continually IMPROVE, not dismantle.
Response to pnwmom (Reply #2)
Name removed Message auto-removed
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)DT is doing. He's dismantling our established bureaucratic systems as fast as he can.
Response to pnwmom (Reply #6)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Wwcd
(6,288 posts)I never ever heard anyone say the word establishment with a clear defination as to what they meant by it.
It was a keyword intended for negative impact.
It worked.
Congrats
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)against "the Establishment" during the campaign -- and he was clearly referring to the government.
He's giving people what they voted for.
JHB
(37,160 posts)...to describe themselves. They "should" use different terms since they don't mean the same thing by it, but that's not how languages work.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)and in their views.
"Centrist" Democrats believe in the same core values as other Democrats, all of which are progressive.
JHB
(37,160 posts)...and in the post you are replying to I was using "progressive" as an example of two different camps (Democratic centrists and the left(s)) using the same word to mean different things.
Which your reply comparing Democrats to the right doesn't address at all.
Your OP notes "DT is doing just what so many on the right and the left called for." Subsequent posts refined that further, homing in on the fact that both use the term "establishment". And that they "should" use different terms if they mean different things, which is a ridiculous thing to expect. I brought up "progressive" as an example of the same word meaning different things to different groups precisely because Democratic centrists and the lefts(s) are ideologically closer than either one to the right but still use the same word differently because it evolved within each group, shaped by their different perspectives.
The different perspectives driving the different uses of uses of "establishment" have been decades in the making, so combining the two uses just because Kremlin Don and his Bannonite flunkies use it too is ridiculous. Not quite on par, but still uncomfortably in the same direction, as RW talking points that Nazis were actually liberals because they had "Socialist" in their German name.
I've been on DU longer than you, but you have 3 times my post count, so I've read plenty of your work and have been on board with most of it. But this is one where I think your premise is sloppy and unproductive.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Accomplishments and good working relationships with others. If you weren't a loner disrupting "the system" you weren't cool enough for the people who claimed they wanted to literally "burn it down". Poor suckers thought a perfect new world would emerge from the ashes.
JHB
(37,160 posts)Because without that there's no particular reason to expect the word to mean precisely the same things to two different groups with their own sets of jargon.
Response to JHB (Reply #9)
Name removed Message auto-removed
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Didn't you see the deluge of RT and Sputnick crap being spread by "progressives" last year? I saw tons on FB. They didn't give a shit it was Russian propaganda as long as it made HRC sound like "and establishment shill".
JHB
(37,160 posts)...and while some of the details were different, the basic framework was the same: the top party leadership.
I continued to encounter this term in the 90s. And 2000's. Didn't you see that?
The Russkies exploited it, but it's flat-out wrong to pretend they invented it. And people who used it before them had their reasons. You might agree with those reasons, you might not, but they existed long before Russian interference.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I can't believe anyone who claims they didn't hear it's use surge last year. It appeals to the rabid destructive nature of he most ignorant and easily angered.
yardwork
(61,622 posts)Wwcd
(6,288 posts)Every one who repeated it.
They shared the keywords. Left & Right.
We all remember it.
All they had was destruction of her character. Repeated & shared it between them.
They all own this disaster today.
Response to Wwcd (Reply #10)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Wwcd
(6,288 posts)Response to Wwcd (Reply #38)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)world wide wally
(21,744 posts)Wwcd
(6,288 posts)Asshholes. Sellouts.
Ya all proud of yourselves now?
MindPilot
(12,693 posts)White, christian, rich, authoritarian, that's the establishment. And DT sure as hell ain't dismantling any of it.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)to dismantle it.
MindPilot
(12,693 posts)and he's wrong about that too.
And he isn't dismantling anything. That implies a deliberative and methodical disassembly process. Trump's just breaking stuff because he doesn't know anything about it.
Please do give him so much credit.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Competent and only added people who want to destroy the depts they "work" for. It's easy to destroy things, and yes, it's one of the only things he is good at. And he has a ton of help with the GOP.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Establishment.
redgreenandblue
(2,088 posts)...during the general election, instead of pissing them away by injecting themselves into a primary between two candidates with identical positions on choice.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)edhopper
(33,580 posts)and Wall Street are the same as the EPA?
Interesting.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)that's what they should say.
Not that they want to fight the "Establishment" -- which many people think is equivalent to the members of Congress and the Governors.
JHB
(37,160 posts)...different groups, and are getting push-back about the conflation.
Why do you assume disparate groups would have uniform views of what they think of as "the establishment"?
And please do not use the words "should" or "shouldn't" in your answer. You are not the Supreme Arbiter of word usage. Languages just do not work that way.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)or shouldn't say.
JHB
(37,160 posts)...is that you do the same and not tell people what their terminology "should" be decades after it had developed.
yardwork
(61,622 posts)edhopper
(33,580 posts)since 1969.
Sounds like you built a strawman for your rant.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)For example,
https://www.thenation.com/article/nina-turner-it-is-not-our-job-to-fit-into-the-democratic-establishment/
Or how about when Planned Parenthood got slammed as part of the "establishment"?
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2016/01/20/bernie_sanders_says_planned_parenthood_is_establishment_is_it.html
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I won't soon forget that. He used the word all the time, I guess you're not a fan either.
Response to bettyellen (Reply #31)
Name removed Message auto-removed
JHB
(37,160 posts)...(with the caveat that in some quarters current usage is overly expansive) since the 1980s.
I mention this because, as I have pointed out elsewhere in this thread, it's not a recently-developed term, and indicates an actual difference of viewpoint within the party that would be unproductive to dismiss as a Russian propaganda invention.
Response to JHB (Reply #34)
Name removed Message auto-removed
yardwork
(61,622 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Looks like he is wreaking everything that benefits the masses.
redgreenandblue
(2,088 posts)pnwmom
(108,978 posts)criticizing the established government.
Language matters. And using a term that can be so easily misunderstood doesn't seem to be a good idea.