Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Chasstev365

(5,191 posts)
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 11:41 PM Nov 2017

And to think the GOP actually impeached Bill Clinton over concentual sex.

"It's not about sex, but about the rule of law and lying under oath", they piously told us.

Trump and Sessions have done so much worse, yet the criminal GOP cabal will tell us with a straight face, "Nope nothing to see here."

51 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And to think the GOP actually impeached Bill Clinton over concentual sex. (Original Post) Chasstev365 Nov 2017 OP
The republican party is the most dangerous criminal organization in the world Dr_Pretorius Nov 2017 #1
+1 dalton99a Dec 2017 #3
+100 n/t librechik Dec 2017 #24
+ 1000 davekriss Dec 2017 #25
+10000 Jarqui Dec 2017 #31
They impeached him because he lied about it. pepperbear Dec 2017 #2
And of course as we all know Trump always tells the truth. Always. LisaL Dec 2017 #4
Pleading guilty to lying to the FBI about colluding with Russia ... Jarqui Dec 2017 #33
Ayup. Even if no collusion is found, they are ALL guilty of LYING Roland99 Dec 2017 #21
So perjury is a crime rainin Dec 2017 #27
It was not really consensual. Lunabell Dec 2017 #5
She initiated. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2017 #6
Boys will be boys? loyalsister Dec 2017 #8
I didnt say that, dont you dare put words in my mouth. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2017 #10
She would have had to have more power for her behavior to have defined the situation loyalsister Dec 2017 #11
Cool story. nt Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2017 #13
Don't tip GaryCnf Dec 2017 #26
He should have resisted. Lunabell Dec 2017 #14
I never said he was right. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2017 #15
It was harassment Lunabell Dec 2017 #17
By definition, it is NOT harassment. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2017 #19
Sure it was Lunabell Dec 2017 #22
That doesn't make it harassment. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2017 #49
It was still wrong Lunabell Dec 2017 #50
Nope , it WAS consensual. Maybe inappropriate , immoral, etc but was JI7 Dec 2017 #44
Yes. She initiated. rainin Dec 2017 #30
She was also publicly vilified loyalsister Dec 2017 #7
She can blame Linda Tripp for that TexasBushwhacker Dec 2017 #20
Tripp deserves blame loyalsister Dec 2017 #35
Huh? They spent tens of millions investigating the Clintons. joshcryer Dec 2017 #37
If he hadn't lied there would have been no perjury to investigate loyalsister Dec 2017 #40
What reptuation? joshcryer Dec 2017 #41
Imagine what it might have been like to apply for a job? loyalsister Dec 2017 #43
$12 million for her book. joshcryer Dec 2017 #48
Linda Tripp got her involved in the nightmare. joshcryer Dec 2017 #36
She has enough compassion to not smear him loyalsister Dec 2017 #38
Are you kidding me? joshcryer Dec 2017 #39
He didn't have the power to control the right wing and THEY are the ones to blame JI7 Dec 2017 #45
He did try to stop it kskiska Dec 2017 #9
In either case, MountCleaners Dec 2017 #32
That "Schmucko" "principle of the United states" sure got what he deserved. joshcryer Dec 2017 #42
consensual -- derived from consent, consensus L. Coyote Dec 2017 #12
Only want him on the cover when he's frog-marched out of the WH. kairos12 Dec 2017 #18
Rule of law applies only to the takers. Not to the Reich Wing. Their actions speak to this everyday. kairos12 Dec 2017 #16
When people refuse to see gop hypocracy, they're bigots. lindysalsagal Dec 2017 #23
I always thought it was conceptual BeyondGeography Dec 2017 #28
Worse. The original Special Counsel investigation had nothing to do with Bill's sex life. Yavin4 Dec 2017 #29
They had the votes so they were going to impeach him for something Blue_Tires Dec 2017 #34
Yup. Just like they would have gone after Hillary for something else if Benghazi never happened JI7 Dec 2017 #46
Yeah they impeached Clinton for sex. Initech Dec 2017 #47
That's not correct is it? carterb034 Dec 2017 #51

Dr_Pretorius

(71 posts)
1. The republican party is the most dangerous criminal organization in the world
Thu Nov 30, 2017, 11:45 PM
Nov 2017

Thieves, gangsters, and traitors seeking only to enrich themselves and their plutocrat masters.

pepperbear

(5,648 posts)
2. They impeached him because he lied about it.
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 12:13 AM
Dec 2017

Remember "I did not have sex with that woman."? That was the moment Ken Starr was popping champagne corks.

Jarqui

(10,130 posts)
33. Pleading guilty to lying to the FBI about colluding with Russia ...
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 07:35 PM
Dec 2017

... (Flynn & Papadopoulos) ... no biggie .. it's Obama's fault!

Lie about getting a blow job ... Impeach!!!

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
8. Boys will be boys?
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 10:42 AM
Dec 2017

The idea that men have no agency because they are at the mercy of their urges is a RW defense.

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
10. I didnt say that, dont you dare put words in my mouth.
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 10:46 AM
Dec 2017

She initiated things, which means she consented.

Was it ethical? No.
Was it legal? Yes.

100% consensual.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
11. She would have had to have more power for her behavior to have defined the situation
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 10:52 AM
Dec 2017

He had the power to resist seduction. After he didn't use his agency to say no, he and his allies mercilessly abused her.

Lunabell

(6,105 posts)
14. He should have resisted.
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 05:28 PM
Dec 2017

He should have gotten HR involved if she initiated. He was wrong. Clinton was wrong. Franken was wrong. Trump was wrong. Conyers was wrong. Sexual harassment is wrong.

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
15. I never said he was right.
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 05:46 PM
Dec 2017

It was unethical, yes. Sleeping with your subordinates is generally unethical.

But it was consensual. Both parties were OK with it.

It was not harassment (like Franken, Conyers, and Trump).

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
19. By definition, it is NOT harassment.
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 05:56 PM
Dec 2017

She initiated the relationship. He consented.

Harassment implies it is unwelcome. It was not.

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
49. That doesn't make it harassment.
Sat Dec 2, 2017, 10:42 AM
Dec 2017

2 consenting adults. By definition is not harassment.
Him being the boss makes it unethical, but 100% NOT harassment.

Words have meanings. I suggest a dictionary, you may learn something.

Or not.

Lunabell

(6,105 posts)
50. It was still wrong
Sat Dec 2, 2017, 05:20 PM
Dec 2017

And he was twice her age. Disgusting behavior and yes, I also fault those who protect men like this just because of politics. #metoo

rainin

(3,011 posts)
30. Yes. She initiated.
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 07:05 PM
Dec 2017

Totally consensual, in my view. No question.

There is the concern about the President being vulnerable to blackmail. Oops, I forgot to add, if you're a democrat.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
7. She was also publicly vilified
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 10:40 AM
Dec 2017

He had the power to prevent or stop it and he didn't. She has said that the relationship was consensual, but she didn't sign up to be part of the nightmare of FBI interrogation and humiliation. She did not sign up to have to try to go about her business with the entire US population knowing the personal details of her sex life.

Powerful aggressors use threats and promises to control people and situations. I doubt he threatened her, but he probably made promises to help advance her future career options.
I think/hope cared about her, and would not have threatened to destroy her reputation. But, what happened to her is a common threat used by perpetrators of sexual abuse.

She faced ruthless public shaming and scapegoating while allies and supporters in the general public rallied around him. That he did not prevent or step in to stop the brutal harassment she faced was cruel.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,214 posts)
20. She can blame Linda Tripp for that
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 06:23 PM
Dec 2017

and she can blame herself for talking about it. Sorry, but there's a big difference between a victim and a volunteer.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
35. Tripp deserves blame
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 08:05 PM
Dec 2017

But, no one would have been interested in those tapes if he hadn't lied. Mr. I feel your pain basked in his approval ratings while she was mercilessly smeared. He has never taken responsibility for his part and apologized for the abuse he stood by and watched her endure to his benefit.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
37. Huh? They spent tens of millions investigating the Clintons.
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 08:11 PM
Dec 2017

Ken Starr alone investigated the Clinton's for the better part of a decade and the only thing they could get to stick was by trapping him in a situation where he would have to lie about his infidelity.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
40. If he hadn't lied there would have been no perjury to investigate
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 08:18 PM
Dec 2017

Ken Starr's obvious ruthlessness was well known to him when he lied. He walked straight into it and then watched as his friends and callous supporters destroyed her reputation.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
41. What reptuation?
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 08:55 PM
Dec 2017

She had affairs before Clinton and watched Day's of Our Lives, going on daddy's $20k vacations, driving Mercedes. An admitted serial liar, said so by herself on tape. That's her accomplishment in life. Have you not listened to the tape Tripp made? Lewinsky was a vindictive piece of work. But Tripp played her like a fiddle (by recording those private conversations).

The reality is that Bill Clinton tried to end the affair privately and she decided to take him down with her, since she couldn't keep up the facade anymore.

And I'm being told here that she was victimized. My goodness. Do you take me for, as she called Bill, a "schmucko"?

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
43. Imagine what it might have been like to apply for a job?
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 10:05 PM
Dec 2017

Callous cheerleaders continue to ignore the fact that he could have stopped what was happening to her. Protect the powerful man at all costs.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
48. $12 million for her book.
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 10:20 PM
Dec 2017


Her only "damage" was that she couldn't keep being a Beverly Hills gal running around in LA glitz and glamor like she did as a young woman with daddy's money. But now she can do the talking head circuit talking about how she was a poor victimized girl when in reality she was a spoiled rich brat who had affairs with married men for thrills.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
36. Linda Tripp got her involved in the nightmare.
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 08:08 PM
Dec 2017

And the whole right wing apparatus.

She still blames the Clintons.

If Clinton made "promises to help advance her future career options" she never said a damn thing about it in her book. She makes herself out to be a doting young woman dazzled by the handsome President.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
38. She has enough compassion to not smear him
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 08:12 PM
Dec 2017

and not reveal all details. Linda Tripp and her tapes were of no consequence without his lie.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
39. Are you kidding me?
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 08:14 PM
Dec 2017

She literally rolled out her book during his wife's historic campaign and ran the circuit playing victim. She never at any point placed the blame where it belongs, with the right wing.

kskiska

(27,047 posts)
9. He did try to stop it
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 10:43 AM
Dec 2017

That's when she began making threats. The agreement at the beginning was that either one could opt out, but when he tried, she didn't want it to end. That's when she was sent to work at the Pentagon.

MountCleaners

(1,148 posts)
32. In either case,
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 07:34 PM
Dec 2017

...it was a dumb thing to do, and both parties used extremely poor judgment. Given the right's rabid nature, they should have refrained from doing anything that would give them ammunition.

lindysalsagal

(20,729 posts)
23. When people refuse to see gop hypocracy, they're bigots.
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 06:48 PM
Dec 2017

Because they'll back anything or anyone who goes after non-white xtian males, and gives everything to the already rich. No matter how little sense it makes.

They'll support Russia corrupting our election, and prosecute an adult blow job, because it's money, or it just doesn't matter.

Yavin4

(35,445 posts)
29. Worse. The original Special Counsel investigation had nothing to do with Bill's sex life.
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 07:04 PM
Dec 2017

It was only after the Paula Jones civil suit when Ken Starr's investigation was expanded into who Bill was fucking. That's when he lied about Monica, and was impeached after that.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
34. They had the votes so they were going to impeach him for something
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 07:43 PM
Dec 2017

the impeachment was years in the making...

Initech

(100,101 posts)
47. Yeah they impeached Clinton for sex.
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 10:20 PM
Dec 2017

Yet Trump has had accusations of sexual harassment and assault - things a hundred million times worse than what Clinton did, they are just like "whatever". Assholes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»And to think the GOP actu...