General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnd to think the GOP actually impeached Bill Clinton over concentual sex.
"It's not about sex, but about the rule of law and lying under oath", they piously told us.
Trump and Sessions have done so much worse, yet the criminal GOP cabal will tell us with a straight face, "Nope nothing to see here."
Dr_Pretorius
(71 posts)Thieves, gangsters, and traitors seeking only to enrich themselves and their plutocrat masters.
librechik
(30,676 posts)davekriss
(4,627 posts)pepperbear
(5,648 posts)Remember "I did not have sex with that woman."? That was the moment Ken Starr was popping champagne corks.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)Jarqui
(10,130 posts)... (Flynn & Papadopoulos) ... no biggie .. it's Obama's fault!
Lie about getting a blow job ... Impeach!!!
Roland99
(53,342 posts)rainin
(3,011 posts)when you're a democrat? sarcasm
Lunabell
(6,105 posts)He was her boss.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)It was 100% consensual.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)The idea that men have no agency because they are at the mercy of their urges is a RW defense.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)She initiated things, which means she consented.
Was it ethical? No.
Was it legal? Yes.
100% consensual.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)He had the power to resist seduction. After he didn't use his agency to say no, he and his allies mercilessly abused her.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)GaryCnf
(1,399 posts)the sacred cow.
Lunabell
(6,105 posts)He should have gotten HR involved if she initiated. He was wrong. Clinton was wrong. Franken was wrong. Trump was wrong. Conyers was wrong. Sexual harassment is wrong.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)It was unethical, yes. Sleeping with your subordinates is generally unethical.
But it was consensual. Both parties were OK with it.
It was not harassment (like Franken, Conyers, and Trump).
Lunabell
(6,105 posts)He was her boss. #metoo
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)She initiated the relationship. He consented.
Harassment implies it is unwelcome. It was not.
Lunabell
(6,105 posts)He was her boss. He had the power. He should have been the "adult" in the room.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)2 consenting adults. By definition is not harassment.
Him being the boss makes it unethical, but 100% NOT harassment.
Words have meanings. I suggest a dictionary, you may learn something.
Or not.
Lunabell
(6,105 posts)And he was twice her age. Disgusting behavior and yes, I also fault those who protect men like this just because of politics. #metoo
JI7
(89,264 posts)Consensual
rainin
(3,011 posts)Totally consensual, in my view. No question.
There is the concern about the President being vulnerable to blackmail. Oops, I forgot to add, if you're a democrat.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)He had the power to prevent or stop it and he didn't. She has said that the relationship was consensual, but she didn't sign up to be part of the nightmare of FBI interrogation and humiliation. She did not sign up to have to try to go about her business with the entire US population knowing the personal details of her sex life.
Powerful aggressors use threats and promises to control people and situations. I doubt he threatened her, but he probably made promises to help advance her future career options.
I think/hope cared about her, and would not have threatened to destroy her reputation. But, what happened to her is a common threat used by perpetrators of sexual abuse.
She faced ruthless public shaming and scapegoating while allies and supporters in the general public rallied around him. That he did not prevent or step in to stop the brutal harassment she faced was cruel.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,214 posts)and she can blame herself for talking about it. Sorry, but there's a big difference between a victim and a volunteer.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)But, no one would have been interested in those tapes if he hadn't lied. Mr. I feel your pain basked in his approval ratings while she was mercilessly smeared. He has never taken responsibility for his part and apologized for the abuse he stood by and watched her endure to his benefit.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Ken Starr alone investigated the Clinton's for the better part of a decade and the only thing they could get to stick was by trapping him in a situation where he would have to lie about his infidelity.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)Ken Starr's obvious ruthlessness was well known to him when he lied. He walked straight into it and then watched as his friends and callous supporters destroyed her reputation.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)She had affairs before Clinton and watched Day's of Our Lives, going on daddy's $20k vacations, driving Mercedes. An admitted serial liar, said so by herself on tape. That's her accomplishment in life. Have you not listened to the tape Tripp made? Lewinsky was a vindictive piece of work. But Tripp played her like a fiddle (by recording those private conversations).
The reality is that Bill Clinton tried to end the affair privately and she decided to take him down with her, since she couldn't keep up the facade anymore.
And I'm being told here that she was victimized. My goodness. Do you take me for, as she called Bill, a "schmucko"?
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)Callous cheerleaders continue to ignore the fact that he could have stopped what was happening to her. Protect the powerful man at all costs.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Her only "damage" was that she couldn't keep being a Beverly Hills gal running around in LA glitz and glamor like she did as a young woman with daddy's money. But now she can do the talking head circuit talking about how she was a poor victimized girl when in reality she was a spoiled rich brat who had affairs with married men for thrills.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)And the whole right wing apparatus.
She still blames the Clintons.
If Clinton made "promises to help advance her future career options" she never said a damn thing about it in her book. She makes herself out to be a doting young woman dazzled by the handsome President.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)and not reveal all details. Linda Tripp and her tapes were of no consequence without his lie.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)She literally rolled out her book during his wife's historic campaign and ran the circuit playing victim. She never at any point placed the blame where it belongs, with the right wing.
JI7
(89,264 posts)kskiska
(27,047 posts)That's when she began making threats. The agreement at the beginning was that either one could opt out, but when he tried, she didn't want it to end. That's when she was sent to work at the Pentagon.
MountCleaners
(1,148 posts)...it was a dumb thing to do, and both parties used extremely poor judgment. Given the right's rabid nature, they should have refrained from doing anything that would give them ammunition.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)kairos12
(12,871 posts)kairos12
(12,871 posts)lindysalsagal
(20,729 posts)Because they'll back anything or anyone who goes after non-white xtian males, and gives everything to the already rich. No matter how little sense it makes.
They'll support Russia corrupting our election, and prosecute an adult blow job, because it's money, or it just doesn't matter.
BeyondGeography
(39,379 posts)Yavin4
(35,445 posts)It was only after the Paula Jones civil suit when Ken Starr's investigation was expanded into who Bill was fucking. That's when he lied about Monica, and was impeached after that.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)the impeachment was years in the making...
JI7
(89,264 posts)Initech
(100,101 posts)Yet Trump has had accusations of sexual harassment and assault - things a hundred million times worse than what Clinton did, they are just like "whatever". Assholes.
carterb034
(8 posts)I thought he was impeached for lying under oath about it.