President Trumps national monument rollback is illegal and likely to be reversed in court
http://theconversation.com/president-trumps-national-monument-rollback-is-illegal-and-likely-to-be-reversed-in-court-88376
On Dec. 4, President Trump traveled to Utah to sign proclamations downsizing Bears Ears National Monument by 85 percent and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument by nearly 50 percent. [S]ome people think that the natural resources of Utah should be controlled by a small handful of very distant bureaucrats located in Washington, Trump said. And guess what? Theyre wrong.
Native American tribes and environmental organizations have already filed lawsuits challenging Trumps action. In our analysis as environmental and natural resources law scholars, the presidents action is illegal and will likely be overturned in court.
Since 1906 the Antiquities Act has given presidents the authority to set aside federal lands in order to protect historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest.
When a president creates a national monument, the area is reserved for the protection of sites and objects there, and may also be withdrawn, or exempted, from laws that would allow for mining, logging or oil and gas development. Frequently, monument designations grandfather in existing uses of the land, but prohibit new activities such as mineral leases or mining claims.
Because monument designations reorient land use away from resource extraction and toward conservation, some monuments have faced opposition from local officials and members of Congress. In the past two decades, Utah has been a flashpoint for this debate.
(end snip)