General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPBS names CNN's Christiane Amanpour as Charlie Rose's interim replacement
Politico:PBS announced on Monday that CNN International correspondent Christiane Amanpour would be the interim replacement for Charlie Rose after he was fired and his long-running interview show was canceled over multiple allegations of sexual harassment.
Amanpour on PBS adds to the long tradition of public-affairs programming that has been a hallmark of public media for decades, PBS President and CEO Paula Kerger said in a statement.
Rose's eponymous program ran on PBS and Bloomberg TV, and he was also an anchor for CBS This Morning. All three broadcasters let him go on Nov. 21 after The Washington Post and other outlets published multiple, separate accounts of women who said that Rose had sexually harassed or assaulted them.
CNN International will continue to air Amanpours shows on weekdays at 2 p.m. and 5 p.m. EST. Amanpour on PBS will begin airing on New Yorks PBS station on Monday and will roll out to other stations beginning Dec. 11.
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)Nice voice and she is very intelligent and isn't afraid to ask tough questions...
hlthe2b
(102,292 posts)So, she'll never last. (sorry, I'll try to lose the cynicism, but she showed all those skills and attributes in her last show--before it was canceled)
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)Sadly....I am afraid you are correct....
Soxfan58
(3,479 posts)Arkansas Granny
(31,518 posts)RestoreAmerica2020
(3,435 posts)Amanpour speaks I stop what I'm doing and listen not only because she is an intelligent, experienced talented journalist, but that she also brings to the table a diverse perspective which is refreshing.. .and always does her research, knows her topic well, is informative.
Now if only Sunday morning news programming on major networks would take a cue and have women and/or people of color (there are some talented folks out there) at the helm, now that would be a progressive step..after all it is 2017 not the 1950s, que no? Right?