Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 11:24 AM Dec 2017

Forget 'But Gorsuch' - it should be 'But the victims' - By Jennifer Rubin

Forget ‘But Gorsuch’ — it should be ‘But the victims’

By Jennifer Rubin December 5 at 9:00 AM

Republicans have twisted themselves into pretzels to justify support for an alleged serial sex predator who, as president, embraces an alleged child sex predator for Senate. President Trump, the leader of the GOP, endorsed Moore with a poor choice of words (“Go get ’em!“) for the man whom multiple women have said sexually preyed on them as teenagers. The Post adds to the mound of evidence with a new report:

-snip-

Moore has denied even knowing these women. But Trump, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) (Let Alabama voters decide!), the White House staff, a slew of GOP operatives, the governor of Alabama and a segment of the conservative media refuse to recognize reality — or, worse, don’t care if the allegations of sexual misconduct with minors are true. Gosh darn, they need the accused child predator’s vote for tax reform! Facts carry no weight with these people, so those who’ve decided the GOP can tolerate an alleged child sex predator in the U.S. Senate won’t be influenced by more evidence, no matter how irrefutable.

You see, once Republicans decided that Justice Neil Gorsuch, or a tax bill, or deregulation, or anything justified whatever egregious behavior and character flaws Trump and then Moore had, then anything and everything could be rationalized away. I’m quite certain that if David Duke ran on support for the tax plan, Republicans would embrace him. This is moral madness, particularly for a party that fancies itself the party of family values.

It’s a telling moment when one party and its president embrace someone against whom so much evidence of egregious wrongdoing has been presented. Mitt Romney tweeted, “Roy Moore in the US Senate would be a stain on the GOP and on the nation. Leigh Corfman and other victims are courageous heroes. No vote, no majority is worth losing our honor, our integrity.” But Republicans already have. I’d like to think a Romney or a governor like Ohio’s John Kasich could run in a primary and beat Trump, but if he stumbles through the Robert Mueller investigation, it’s hard to image the party abandoning him, especially with “respectable” conservatives doling out talking points (Oh, it’s only a tweet! We don’t really know what happened!)

There is no going back for the GOP. Trump may go, but the people willing to accept Trump — and Moore — will be around. And there is no policy alliance possible, no common bond to be had for a great many Republicans and ex-Republicans with those who’d elevate tax cuts or Gorsuch or any issue above a long line of victims. They’d set Moore (and before him, Trump) as a model and entrust to his character the most important issues of state. To those who find that anathema, there is no going back into the GOP fold with the Trump enablers.

more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/12/05/forget-but-gorsuch-it-should-be-but-the-victims/?utm_term=.366b3c722579

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Forget 'But Gorsuch' - it should be 'But the victims' - By Jennifer Rubin (Original Post) DonViejo Dec 2017 OP
Good for Jennifer Rubin. The GOP would support Heinrich Himmler if he gave them a majority. First Speaker Dec 2017 #1
Trump endorses Roy Moore by saying "Go get'em". Coincidentally justhanginon Dec 2017 #2

First Speaker

(4,858 posts)
1. Good for Jennifer Rubin. The GOP would support Heinrich Himmler if he gave them a majority.
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 11:54 AM
Dec 2017

We're learning who is, and is not, an honorable person, no matter how much I might disagree with them. Rubin--a cheerleader for the Iraq War--is an honorable person. Romney--a moderate who had to pretend to be a "conservative" in 2012--is an honorable man. The list of dishonorables is very, very long...

justhanginon

(3,290 posts)
2. Trump endorses Roy Moore by saying "Go get'em". Coincidentally
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 12:49 PM
Dec 2017

all the shopping malls in Gadsden Alabama closed as a precautionary measure.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Forget 'But Gorsuch' - it...