Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KT2000

(20,583 posts)
Wed Dec 6, 2017, 11:36 PM Dec 2017

What did Franken do

to start the stampede for his resignation?
There was Tweeden who it appears was part of an entertainment group where Franken and Tweeden both acted out.
There was a woman who had her picture taken with Franken and he put his hand on her buttocks.
There was a woman who had her picture taken with Franken and he put his hand around her waist and pinched her waist twice.

What else is there? Is he a rapist? predator? pedophile?
Unless there is a horrible event we don't know about that the senators do, I don't get this. What we know about does not rise to abusive behavior or his removal from office. How far is all of this going to go if we can't discern the differences between unwanted flirty behavior and predatory behavior.

65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What did Franken do (Original Post) KT2000 Dec 2017 OP
It's not what he did. It's that the Democrats in the Senate The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2017 #1
Don't they understand that a zero tolerance policy opens them all up to attacks? unitedwethrive Dec 2017 #12
It is also hypocrisy -esp those who oppose zero tolerance delisen Dec 2017 #61
That's it it is all a political calculation, the Democrats think sacrificing doc03 Dec 2017 #29
They find that they experience blowback if their avebury Dec 2017 #56
What did he do? dflprincess Dec 2017 #2
The only thing I can think of that Franken did was ,... Jimbo101 Dec 2017 #3
Roger Stone choreographed the whole thing. FuzzyRabbit Dec 2017 #9
?? orleans Dec 2017 #34
I dont quite get it, either. TDale313 Dec 2017 #4
So when does zero tolerance apply to Republicans? ollie10 Dec 2017 #58
Political expedient maybe-just seeing 2018 as savior year delisen Dec 2017 #59
Not sure I agree that being against sexual harassment TDale313 Dec 2017 #64
The Dem principle I was referring to: Due Process delisen Dec 2017 #65
There is no difference between "unwanted flirtation" and predatory behavior. Gravitycollapse Dec 2017 #5
The issue isn't whether the behavior is acceptable; it's what the penalty should be. The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2017 #6
Resigning from office isn't ending his life. We aren't throwing him in prison. Gravitycollapse Dec 2017 #7
We DO NOT want him out of office. I am a Minnesota resident, The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2017 #10
Are you even remotely concerned at all for the women who have accused Franken? Gravitycollapse Dec 2017 #11
Are you concerned about women Madam Mossfern Dec 2017 #13
Yeah, I've definitely spoken out against Roy Moore. Gravitycollapse Dec 2017 #15
No, I didn't think that your answer would be no Madam Mossfern Dec 2017 #19
Thanks for this. I think you have made the argument but I fear the momentum may push him out. jakesblues Dec 2017 #43
+1 uponit7771 Dec 2017 #49
Exactly! His alledged offenses are on a completely different level than alledged offenses OhioBlue Dec 2017 #17
Well said! dhol82 Dec 2017 #27
+1, I pray he doesn't resign seeing the huge amount of conflation uponit7771 Dec 2017 #50
I believe he is entitled to the ethics investigation he requested. The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2017 #14
not Tweeden KT2000 Dec 2017 #21
then there's this: orleans Dec 2017 #36
and this orleans Dec 2017 #37
Of course but I'm concerned with due process also one doesn't override the other uponit7771 Dec 2017 #48
And we are??? JeaneRaye Dec 2017 #25
About 50% of Democratic voters... Gravitycollapse Dec 2017 #26
Politico? Really? JeaneRaye Dec 2017 #45
"We want him out of office"?! Collimator Dec 2017 #39
Half of Democratic voters want him gone... Gravitycollapse Dec 2017 #40
Yeah, you forgot this little part "66 percent of voters said the ethics panel should probe Frankens uponit7771 Dec 2017 #51
Isn't it Minnesota's choice? LakeVermilion Dec 2017 #55
To whom? thx in advance uponit7771 Dec 2017 #47
I guess that should be part KT2000 Dec 2017 #18
Or, you know, they could pose for photos and not inappropriately grab women... Gravitycollapse Dec 2017 #20
they would have to show their hands KT2000 Dec 2017 #22
And there's the problem. We don't trust women to not lie. Gravitycollapse Dec 2017 #24
You know, you cant have it both ways dhol82 Dec 2017 #30
Tweeden lied KT2000 Dec 2017 #38
Are those who state that accusation equals guilt secret predators? delisen Dec 2017 #60
Been wondering same thing... fairfaxvadem Dec 2017 #8
Good question. dhol82 Dec 2017 #33
He calls for higher taxes on billionaires... lostnfound Dec 2017 #16
Eight victims. fleabiscuit Dec 2017 #23
How many are anonymous? nt doc03 Dec 2017 #32
Due process uponit7771 Dec 2017 #53
how many are Russians? how many are Roger Stone? ProfessorPlum Dec 2017 #62
How many women have come forward about Donald Trump? I'll wait. YOHABLO Dec 2017 #28
So, you have convicted him of the accusations? Maybe wait until he speaks first. L. Coyote Dec 2017 #31
HaHaHa jakesblues Dec 2017 #44
"What did Franken do?" is the topic. See above OP. L. Coyote Dec 2017 #46
exactly- at the worst Kimchijeon Dec 2017 #35
Exactly! Dems are playing into the wingers hands. Duppers Dec 2017 #41
+1, he deserves due process not pile ons uponit7771 Dec 2017 #54
Zero tolerance, with Franken as a scapegoat goat to prove the point. wisteria Dec 2017 #42
Also, I'm not sure that a lot of those accusations happened. MoonRiver Dec 2017 #52
A reporter was talking about this on NPR earlier today Shrek Dec 2017 #57
great plan ProfessorPlum Dec 2017 #63

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,732 posts)
1. It's not what he did. It's that the Democrats in the Senate
Wed Dec 6, 2017, 11:39 PM
Dec 2017

are making him the sacrificial lamb for their new zero-tolerance policy, which apparently applies only to other Democrats.

unitedwethrive

(1,997 posts)
12. Don't they understand that a zero tolerance policy opens them all up to attacks?
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 12:17 AM
Dec 2017

They need to have an internal (Democratic Party) evaluation, and then send all allegations to the ethics committee of the appropriate chamber. At least going through regular evaluation and procedure will make the GOP think twice about giving themselves more work.

doc03

(35,345 posts)
29. That's it it is all a political calculation, the Democrats think sacrificing
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 01:18 AM
Dec 2017

our own will give them something to campaign on next year. Why doesn't these 20 something Democratic Senators say Trump should resign. If Roy Moore gets elected they won't have the spine to appose him either. SAD

avebury

(10,952 posts)
56. They find that they experience blowback if their
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:10 AM
Dec 2017

actions result in liberals staying home next year and not getting out the vote.

I swear that Democrats continually act as their own worse enemies.

dflprincess

(28,079 posts)
2. What did he do?
Wed Dec 6, 2017, 11:40 PM
Dec 2017

Went after Jeff Sessions for one thing and that's whast started the attsck. The Democrats are just doing the Republicans' dirty work because they never learn.

Jimbo101

(776 posts)
3. The only thing I can think of that Franken did was ,...
Wed Dec 6, 2017, 11:43 PM
Dec 2017

to (rightfully) call Jeff Sessions a liar in an open Senate Hearing

(and then Roger Stone went to work) < don't know that for a fact - but it has all the trademarks of a hatchet job.

FuzzyRabbit

(1,967 posts)
9. Roger Stone choreographed the whole thing.
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 12:08 AM
Dec 2017

Remember he tweeted, twice, the day before the first accuser went public, that Al Franken was going down because of sexual misconduct.

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
4. I dont quite get it, either.
Wed Dec 6, 2017, 11:47 PM
Dec 2017

I see a couple of possibilities. (Or a mixture of both)

1) There is more out there than we know, and the Senators coming out for Franken’s resignation know it.

2) Either because they feel it’s genuinely right or politically wise or both, Dems want to be seen as having a zero-tolerance policy for sexual harassment/abuse and calling for Franken’s resignation supports that.

 

ollie10

(2,091 posts)
58. So when does zero tolerance apply to Republicans?
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:13 AM
Dec 2017

Let's be clear on two things:

1) the lynch mob Senators are NOT calling on Trump to resign or any Republican. You know, don't want to hurt their precious little feelings......

2) some of them are using this to score political points as presidential wannabees for 2020.

delisen

(6,044 posts)
59. Political expedient maybe-just seeing 2018 as savior year
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:21 AM
Dec 2017

and sacrificing principles to get the newly emerged demographic of republican women against sexual harassment.

Unfortunately, Mitch NcConnell may well outsmart us again.

Whomever may be appointed by Gov Dayton may be incredibly pure put we have seen the innocent Democrat successfully skewered before......

A resignation by Franken equals opportunity for Evil, and the evil will give it everything they have.

delisen

(6,044 posts)
65. The Dem principle I was referring to: Due Process
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:53 AM
Dec 2017

I don't believe in sacrificing due process. One can be against sexual harassment and for due process.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
5. There is no difference between "unwanted flirtation" and predatory behavior.
Wed Dec 6, 2017, 11:47 PM
Dec 2017

Predatory behavior can exist in various forms and severities. Just because a serial rapist is defined as a predator does not mean a man who feels he can touch and harass women isn't also a predator.

The whole discourse on "flirtation" in here makes me suspicious of what people seem to think constitutes safe, respectful interpersonal conduct.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,732 posts)
6. The issue isn't whether the behavior is acceptable; it's what the penalty should be.
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 12:00 AM
Dec 2017

I think everyone agrees that nobody should be touched in ways they haven't consented to. But there is still a continuum of the severity or criminality of unconsented touching. Calling a quick pat on the butt of an adult acquaintance the equivalent of the violent rape of a child ignores the reality of that continuum. In criminal law, penalties vary greatly with the severity of the crime; should we not recognize this continuum in other contexts? We can acknowledge butt-patting is wrong and inappropriate, but what should the career consequences be? The same as the consequences for raping an employee?

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
7. Resigning from office isn't ending his life. We aren't throwing him in prison.
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 12:05 AM
Dec 2017

That's the continuum you speak of so glowingly.

We aren't calling for him to be executed. We want him out of office.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,732 posts)
10. We DO NOT want him out of office. I am a Minnesota resident,
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 12:11 AM
Dec 2017

I voted for him and I'll vote for him again if he runs again. I don't want my vote taken away from me just because some Senators think they can shame the GOP by throwing one of the best senators this state has ever had under the Big Liberal Bus of Self-Righteous Virtue. The GOP is past shaming and the only result of hounding Franken out of the senate is the loss of a very effective progressive senator and the gain of exactly nothing. Democrats are masters at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
11. Are you even remotely concerned at all for the women who have accused Franken?
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 12:16 AM
Dec 2017

Or is this really only about your vote?

Madam Mossfern

(2,340 posts)
13. Are you concerned about women
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 12:21 AM
Dec 2017

and legislation that will harm them when Republicans have more control? Are you speaking out against Roy Moore?
Have you? As far as all the women, we really don't know who they are, do we?

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
15. Yeah, I've definitely spoken out against Roy Moore.
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 12:26 AM
Dec 2017

Did you honestly think the answer to that question would be no? Get real.

Madam Mossfern

(2,340 posts)
19. No, I didn't think that your answer would be no
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 12:37 AM
Dec 2017

Sorry for the snakiness. I'm a woman and I'm a survivor - that being said, I don't believe accusations merely because they were made by women against men. There has been nothing that I've seen that would have me believe that Franken should step down.

Think of it my way, being a rape victim. Every time a woman falsely accuses someone of rape makes it more difficult for real rape victims to be believed. So far there has been no hearing, no proof that Franken is a sexual predator. He shouldn't be a sacrificial lamb for this cause. His resignation will not make a difference to the real perpetrators and the loss of his presence in Congress will be devastating.

jakesblues

(9 posts)
43. Thanks for this. I think you have made the argument but I fear the momentum may push him out.
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 02:38 AM
Dec 2017

Hoping his argument is as good as yours and he gets his day. He is one of the best and sorely needed.

OhioBlue

(5,126 posts)
17. Exactly! His alledged offenses are on a completely different level than alledged offenses
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 12:34 AM
Dec 2017

by others. Have any of you ever patted a teammate's butt? Touched someone's waist when you put your arm around them? Touched someone's boob by accident? This is just veering off into insanity that we are counting all of these allegations against Franken as sexual misconduct an on par with what Moore and Trump have been accused of. And our Dem Senators are willing to throw their colleague under the bus for what? He is an ally in our fight FOR Women's rights, the CHIP bill, DACA, Healthcare, sane fiscal policy, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, etc. And fighting GOP collusion with Russia, reckless tax cuts, global warming.... I mean, My God, the list is endless and we're just going to roll over and quit. A Dem Gov can appoint his seat but there will still be a special election and we could lose a Dem seat all together because Minnesota voters get pissed.

And for everyone saying this feels like Acorn - I agree.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,732 posts)
14. I believe he is entitled to the ethics investigation he requested.
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 12:24 AM
Dec 2017

I do not believe that anonymous complaints should be given much credence, and I also believe Leeann Tweeden's complaint is suspect because it was aided and abetted by Roger Stone and Sean Hannity. I think women's complaints should be taken seriously but they should be subjected to scrutiny just as much as any other allegation of wrongdoing. I do not believe anyone should be driven from office on the basis of completely unscrutinized allegations, which is why the investigation should go forward. If the investigation substantiates a pattern of wrongdoing, then there should be some consequences, to be determined by the Senate. Otherwise, yes, my vote is important. He is effectively the employee of the voters of Minnesota, and as it stands right now, nobody gets to "fire" him but us.

KT2000

(20,583 posts)
21. not Tweeden
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 12:52 AM
Dec 2017

not sure about any others. This effort is being used to take down Franken, as orchestrated by Roger Stone. I want more background on the women.

JeaneRaye

(402 posts)
45. Politico? Really?
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 03:12 AM
Dec 2017

You are citing a poll from a right leaning website. That poll probably includes a lot of right wingers. I don't care what their opinion of Al Franken is. Ask those same people how they feel about Roy Moore or Donald Trump and they would probably would totally support them. Give me a poll that says 50% of Democratic voters want him to resign and maybe I'll give it some credence. Until then, be careful of your sources.

Collimator

(1,639 posts)
39. "We want him out of office"?!
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 01:44 AM
Dec 2017

Who is this "we" that you speak of? The majority of people that I hear from want him to remain a pain in the Republicans' butts. I would also like to see him stand no closer than two feet from people during any future photo opts, but that's for his sake.

The butts and side-boobs and waists of America's womenfolk are not in any ongoing danger from Al Franken "rapaciousness" should he remain in office.

Our reproductive rights and the health of our children are in danger from rapacious Republicans.

Furthermore, while "we" aren't calling for him to be executed, you don't seem to object to seeing his character assassinated.

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
51. Yeah, you forgot this little part "66 percent of voters said the ethics panel should probe Frankens
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:03 AM
Dec 2017

... actions"

LakeVermilion

(1,042 posts)
55. Isn't it Minnesota's choice?
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:08 AM
Dec 2017

It really doesn't matter what the national party wants.

As far as I'm concerned, he can become an independent like Sanders.

KT2000

(20,583 posts)
18. I guess that should be part
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 12:37 AM
Dec 2017

of the discussion. I personally believe there is a difference and context is important. I am about the same age as Franken so I can see where he thought when he was having a picture taken with someone who asked, he would see his behavior as cute and not predatory. As we go through this change, I am sure he is capable of changing his behavior. What is the intent - Surely we can see the differences.

In the meantime, politicians should not pose for photos with constituents.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
20. Or, you know, they could pose for photos and not inappropriately grab women...
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 12:46 AM
Dec 2017

Or make rude sexual gestures toward them while they're sleeping.

I'm much younger than you. Maybe age and generation is a factor here. From my young perspective, I possess little sympathy for the "he's just from a different time" argument. If that is the case, then older men who can't keep their hands to themselves should settle into retirement and let younger generations take the reigns. It's not like not touching women inappropriately just became this novel idea last week.

KT2000

(20,583 posts)
22. they would have to show their hands
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 01:01 AM
Dec 2017

and keep light between each person to make sure there is no inappropriate touching otherwise anything can be said.

Older men are capable of learning and changing. Franken, being more intelligent than most is capable of that.

You can be sure that changes will occur over the lifetime of younger people as well.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
24. And there's the problem. We don't trust women to not lie.
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 01:07 AM
Dec 2017

That's basically what you've implied by arguing that it must be visible that men aren't touching someone inappropriately. As if there's some unspoken movement of women out to falsely accuse men.

This is a cultural problem that we really need to get over. Women overwhelmingly tell the truth when they make accusations of harassment and assault. We need to start believing them instead of getting paranoid and defensive when they make accusations against people we like.

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
30. You know, you cant have it both ways
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 01:22 AM
Dec 2017

If anybody stands too close they can be accused of anything.
I think, by your standards, all public figures should not be able to take pictures with fans or constituents. Much too much opportunity for hanky panky on all sides.
If all women tell the truth then we must not put them into situations where anything at all possible might be misconstrued.
Right?

delisen

(6,044 posts)
60. Are those who state that accusation equals guilt secret predators?
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:27 AM
Dec 2017

We know from psychology and the concept of psychological projection that those who are quick to judge others
may be Quilty of the same behaviors.

fairfaxvadem

(1,231 posts)
8. Been wondering same thing...
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 12:07 AM
Dec 2017

Working in DC, this place leaks like a sieve unless you’re Robert Mueller. Total Peyton Place here. If there is worse to come, hard to believe it’s not in the press yet or rumored around the Hill. Possible, but not how this town usually operates. Gossip is the coin of the realm in these parts.

We all operate within our own gray space. Some of us have a larger gray space than others. I certainly don’t want any man or woman trying to dictate how any of us should feel from one experience to another. My shrug-off of certain behavior because I don’t think it’s any big deal, well, another woman may not agree. Fair enough. I have a colleague who is not as shrug-off’y as I am and we agree to disagree. I’ve called out enough men over the years so I know what my own boundaries are. As should we all. And being treated badly isn’t confined to sexual harassment. There are many variations of assholery out there.

So, no, I’m personally not on the fainting couch over Senator Franken at this point. Others are.

I still want to know how Roger Stone knew it was Franken’s “time in the barrel.” I haven’t seen anything on that little bit in a while...

jakesblues

(9 posts)
44. HaHaHa
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 02:55 AM
Dec 2017

Now that's funny. He stands accused of forcible rape of a 14 year old. His pal,Epstein is still doing time for similar crimes. He had deep pockets and still could not get out of the case - cases he faced. Many have come forward since with credible cases against the serial monster. Watch the tape on Access Hollywood (ABC) and listen to what he says. This is pointless. Everyone who ever knew him would tell you the kind of man he is. I hope he gets his day,many of them in a court of law.

Kimchijeon

(1,606 posts)
35. exactly- at the worst
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 01:25 AM
Dec 2017

maybe unwanted flirty behavior. Which I think all of us as human beings have probably been on either end of. It's ludicrous false equivalency as many have said. A complete unwarranted knee-jerk reaction, just like the fascists were hoping for.

Duppers

(28,125 posts)
41. Exactly! Dems are playing into the wingers hands.
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 02:20 AM
Dec 2017

And I expect some trolls are altering on these posts.

 

wisteria

(19,581 posts)
42. Zero tolerance, with Franken as a scapegoat goat to prove the point.
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 02:21 AM
Dec 2017

I guess the party will have a purity test for all candidates now. And, those who are there now, better watch their backs. The Republicans could have another whole line up of women and men claiming sexual misconduct against Democrats. Nice strategy Dems.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
52. Also, I'm not sure that a lot of those accusations happened.
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:04 AM
Dec 2017

Franken deserves a Senate ethics hearing, during which the accusers come forward publically. Anonymous does not work for me.

Shrek

(3,981 posts)
57. A reporter was talking about this on NPR earlier today
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:12 AM
Dec 2017

According to the reporter a number of Democratic senators (women, mostly) were frustrated but were giving him "space" to let the process play out. Apparently they collectively agreed to begin pressing for a resignation if any further accusers came forward. When that happened yesterday it triggered the pre-arranged plan.

ProfessorPlum

(11,257 posts)
63. great plan
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:34 AM
Dec 2017

especially the part about allowing anonymous accusers, who might be Russians, who might be Roger Stone in disguise, who might be lying, who describe sexual harassment as something that happens right out in the open in front of cameras and crowds of people, to determine their actions.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What did Franken do