General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI had dinner with Tom Perez and Party leadership tonight...
...I can say that 1) they recognize the need to invest in State Parties, and 2) they recognize that a clear message that resonates with votes in each State is essential.
BootinUp
(47,165 posts)elleng
(130,967 posts)meaning careful coordination, I hope.
Do you think they have/will have/will help states find suitable spokespeople, to get the job(s) done?
brooklynite
(94,594 posts)Egnever
(21,506 posts)Kimchijeon
(1,606 posts)Kirk Lover
(3,608 posts)Stinky The Clown
(67,808 posts)Wudja have?
dhill926
(16,343 posts)brooklynite
(94,594 posts)msongs
(67,413 posts)brooklynite
(94,594 posts)leftstreet
(36,108 posts)They can't risk losing midterm seats with long drawn out ethics hearings
That doesn't mean it's personal. They probably like him just fine
brooklynite
(94,594 posts)LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)I think "A BETTER DEAL" will get Dems out to vote. I mean what a STIRRING message. WHOO HOO
Wait, that's if Dems CAN vote in 2018, assuming the right-winged Supreme Court doesn't say that gerrymandering can continue in Wisconsin. If Dems are not gerrymandered or voter-suppressed off voter rolls across this country. That's if they can find unhackable voting machines that are serviced and working.
I wonder if Dems know that the ruskies will once again have input into our elections? Sanctions haven't even been enforced by pussy-grabber-in-chief, and won't be. He's beholden to HIS master after all.
Yeah, I'm going Indy in January 2018.