General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums538 - Nate Silver - "Why Democrats Are Finally Pushing Franken To Resign"
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-democrats-are-finally-pushing-franken-to-resign/Three weeks ago, after Leeann Tweeden accused Minnesota Sen. Al Franken of groping her and kissing her without her consent, we argued that Democrats ought to have pushed for Franken to resign. Doing so would have allowed them to claim the moral high ground at a time when allegations of sexual misconduct had implicated both Democratic and Republican politicians including President Trump and Roy Moore, the Republican Senate candidate in Alabama. It would also have come at a relatively small political price, since Frankens replacement would be named by a Democratic governor and Democrats would be favored to keep the seat in a special election in 2018.
Democrats didnt see it the same way; instead, the party line was that Frankens case should be referred to the Senate ethics committee. But the party has since shifted gears: On Wednesday, a cavalcade of Democratic senators first several female members, such as New Yorks Kirsten Gillibrand and Hawaiis Mazie Hirono, but eventually including party leaders such as New Yorks Chuck Schumer called on Franken to resign. Frankens office has said hell make an announcement about his future on Thursday, which many reporters expect to be a resignation.
So what changed? Most obviously, several other women came forward with accusations that Franken had groped them or made unwanted advances toward them, including two new accusations on Thursday alone.
Unfortunately, this was fairly predictable: Sexual predation is often serial. (Consider, for instance, that, on Jezebels fairly exhaustive list of prominent men accused of sexual harassment or sexual assault, all but a handful have multiple accusers.) The lesson is that even if party leaders think that an initial allegation against one of their members may be politically survivable or morally tolerable, it will often be followed by other accusations.
snip - long, good read.
one snip from the last paragraph
Maintaining the moral high ground isnt always easy. It means you have to hold your party to a higher standard than the other party. It means you sometimes have to make real trade-offs. But it can also pay political dividends and mitigate political risks.
fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)greeny2323
(590 posts)Should be investigated through some due process.
Beartracks
(12,816 posts)Last edited Thu Dec 7, 2017, 11:55 PM - Edit history (1)
Why should we believe anonymous accusations?
If that's all it takes to bring down a giant of the Senate, then yeah, if I were a Koch brother I'd start "finding" (I mean "paying" ) more women to "make accusations." Cheap investment, HUGE payoff.
===============
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)We have no clue who most of these accusers are.
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)How about Moore?
FreeState
(10,572 posts)Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)cilla4progress
(24,736 posts)Go hard after trump, farenthold, Clarence Thomas - damn the entire GOP!
still_one
(92,219 posts)cilla4progress
(24,736 posts)Their permission.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)cilla4progress
(24,736 posts)The halls of Congress. We go after them on every way and place we can!
Vote. March. Email. Call. Write.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)The show "Morning Joe" is watched by a lot of people. Rachel is watched. Chris Hayes is watched...these are mass media influencers.
still_one
(92,219 posts)and have been calling him out since his sexual abuses became publi. The public doesnt care about Thomas, and the Democrats have been very loud and vocal about trumps sexism, racism, bigotry, and the allegations regarding his inappropriate sexual behavior toward women. It isnt resonating, and it is unlikely the republicans will impeach him
Will that motivate people to the polls in 2018?
It should, but trumps blatant racism, sexism, and bigotry didnt motivate them in 2016
If anything motivates them it most likely will be something like the atrocious tax bill, but we will see soon enough
delisen
(6,044 posts)or does their pushing out Franken signal they won't.
standingtall
(2,785 posts)At best it has no effect on upcoming elections and at worse it cost Democrats voters. Dumping Franken will not gain us one republican voter period. We can shout we have the moral high ground until we are blue in the face and it will not move them one bit.
dalton99a
(81,515 posts)BannonsLiver
(16,396 posts)i Just cant buy into the moral high ground argument. Theres no evidence voters place a high value on that when it matters. Any seperation the Dems might be able to get from the both sides malaise by forcing Franken out would be fleeting at best the way current news cycles work. Certainly not some paradigm changing moment.
dalton99a
(81,515 posts)and irrelevance
While millions of Americans suffer and die at the hands of traitors and thieves.
lostnfound
(16,180 posts)Duncan Grant
(8,264 posts)Thank you.
Cosmocat
(14,565 posts)Holding ourselves to a standard that will be meaningless to anyone else.
crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)I don't see it as an asymmetric standard (although I do see that with other issues). I see it as a child saying "But everyone else is allowed to do this" when parents aren't allowing said child to do something.
If Democrats hold sexual misconduct accountable in their party (they can't control what the other side does) then it sends a message to voters that it is not ok period.
question everything
(47,486 posts)as suckers.
And don't be so sure that the seat will remain Democratic in a 2018 elections. Minnesota is now purple, Hillary won by only 1.5% and both houses are Republicans.
We've seen comments that the Republican party is disintegrated because of Moore. I think that the same can be said about us, because so many jumped on Franken.
Willie Pep
(841 posts)They knew the Democrats would wilt. And yet Trump won and Roy Moore may very well win in an election that shouldn't even be close but is.
And you are right about Minnesota. On some other liberal blogs people are saying we don't have to worry because Minnesota is a blue state. Like much of he Midwest, though, it has turned purple and is no longer a slam dunk state for us.
fallout87
(819 posts)And what political dividends will this pay out? Fucking nothing.
Nate silver is wrong as often as he's right. He's a hack
KPN
(15,646 posts)What dividends? People (Repugs/Indies/Greenies) are going to switch and vote for Democrats because they "took the moral high ground?" Are you frigging kidding me? Talk about pipe-dream.
Mitigate political risks? What would those be Nate? You think removing a possible blemish is going to take away the GOPs ability to attack our blemishes? Geezuz! They make them up and bozos believe them.
No wonder we keep losing at every level!
dalton99a
(81,515 posts)More_Cowbell
(2,191 posts)Since they don't, I don't see any dividends. Does anyone think that the GOP voters in Alabama would vote for Doug Jones if Franken resigns? Because I don't.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)If Franken resigns, Republican's won't vote for Moore? In what Universe? So what dividends do we get except potentially losing a senate seat?
wisteria
(19,581 posts)wisteria
(19,581 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)No one wants to go up against her and her "themes". Politicians can't have such narrow themes, they need to represent all of us and in this case the voters don't want to push out one of our best voices.
We should matter more than "her career" or others who are clearly trying to show "leadership" to get nominated
delisen
(6,044 posts)I don't think senators from NY should decide who represents Minnesotans.
I don't thin this method of operation ends sexual harassment.
Doodley
(9,093 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)Haven't you figured that out?
Doodley
(9,093 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)and Moore will not be held to the same standard...they will win and we will lose...when we lose social security, medicare and die, I suppose we'll have our moral superiority to comfort us...yeah... and just wait until the GOP refuses to seat the replacement before the new tax vote or at all. They don't have to you know. Notice that while there is some protection for elected senators, there is none for appointed senators (Powell v.McCormack).
"Both houses of the United States Congress have refused to seat new members based on Article I, Section 5 of the United States Constitution which states that, "Each House shall be the judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members, and a majority of each shall constitute a quorum to do business; but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the attendance of absent members, in such manner, and under such penalties as each House may provide." This had been interpreted that members of the House of Representatives and of the Senate could refuse to recognize the election or appointment of a new representative or senator for any reason, often political heterodoxy or criminal record. Powell v. McCormack (1969) limited the powers of the Congress to refuse to seat an elected member to when the individual does not meet the specific constitutional requirements of age, citizenship or residency. From the decision by Chief Justice Earl Warren: "Therefore, we hold that, since Adam Clayton Powell, Jr., was duly elected by the voters of the 18th Congressional District of New York and was not ineligible to serve under any provision of the Constitution, the House was without power to exclude him from its membership."
Doodley
(9,093 posts)should be labeled as the party that has a sitting pedophile. Let Moore be a noose around the GOP neck.
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)resign...it won't hurt the GOP at all. Winning is not the best thing, it is the only thing.
Doodley
(9,093 posts)Last edited Thu Dec 7, 2017, 09:24 PM - Edit history (1)
ChubbyStar
(3,191 posts)Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)She is a right wing liar and I will never stop defending one of our own unjustly accused.
MFM008
(19,816 posts)We will have our moral superiority to keep us warm
And the pussy grabbers will write
the laws that will kill us.
Good plan.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)This!
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)n2doc
(47,953 posts)No dividends will be paid, except to Republicans. Just look around at DU for a lesson.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Moral high ground would involve giving his side a chance!
Mere number of accusations doesn't mean anything. Republicans know that! That's all they need! It isn't hard to find enough people.
Anonymous accusers do not count.
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)types ..one with close ties to Hannity. I would rather win than take a high road which is paved with GOP bullshit lies.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)Moore and Franken are not the same, yet he is treating them as if they are. And of course the Republicans are being held to no such standard, politically.
dlk
(11,569 posts)They are not one and the same! When they are combined, women with legitimate claims are the losers.
Mme. Defarge
(8,033 posts)horse sh*t, if youll pardon my non-French.
Farmer-Rick
(10,185 posts)NOT
Yes, when fighting evil sometimes you have to give up the moral high ground like Trump and the RepubliCONS do. You can not fight evil by claiming moral superiority, at some point you need to fight.
110liberal
(21 posts)great post treestar this highground stuff is not in step with the base most dems, I believe, believe in giving both sides being given a chance to present their side or respond to an anonymous source
mountain grammy
(26,623 posts)deep, dark depression. We lose Al Franken for a public hug or squeeze while assaulters are still there. Tina Dupuy hosted my favorite radio show today and I couldn't listen for long to her sounding self righteous. She was laughing about the incident.. it embarrassed her because she had gained weight and there was this roll at her waist for him to squeeze.. must have been awful. Such a traumatic experience in a room full of people while she grinned for the camera.. I'm sorry, I've always liked her but think this is all for publicity and sickening. Al had no power over her, everyone was having a good time.. sure, he shouldn't have done it, but an elbow to the ribs would have gotten his attention. He wasn't fucking mauling her!
But no, Tina. Let's wait until the fighter of the Senate, standing up to Sessions and the liars, is on the ropes and tell you stupid, trivial story.. People are losing their health insurance, we will be in a war, our economy will be in the tank, we have a president who doesn't believe all Americans should have equal rights and that's a fucking problem, but for heaven's sake, girl, if this is your biggest trauma, you are one lucky woman.
Sorry about your weight problem, Tina.
Sorry about the rant, but I feel better.
kacekwl
(7,017 posts)Butterflylady
(3,544 posts)You don't know what you're talking about.
Mme. Defarge
(8,033 posts)to the 2016 presidential campaign?
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)I'd like to visit that universe. It sounds nice. But, alas, I'm here in this universe with the rest of you all. That one where the Republican Party's epic hypocrisy hasn't prevented them from controlling the White House, US House, US Senate, a clear majority of governorships and a clear majority of state legislatures.