Does Kirsten Gillibrand's zero-tolerance apply to anyone other than Al Fraken?

[dansolo]

She has made claims in the past about being harassed, but I don't recall her naming any of the people involved in the harassment. If she really believes in zero-tolerance, then she should be exposing every single member of Congress who she is aware of who has either harassed her personally, or who has secretly paid out money to make harassment claims go away. Anything less and she is a flaming hypocrite and a political opportunist.

[cilla4progress]

1. Good

point

[femmocrat]

2. I agree.

And she should immediately call for trump's resignation.

[brooklynite]

3. Has someone else in the Democratic Party been credibly accused of something?

[dansolo]

8. She has claimed that she has been sexually harassed

I don't understand the point you are trying to make. I am assuming that her own experiences would count as credible to her.

[Blaukraut]

4. Yes. The next Democrat who gets accused (swiftboated)

Because nobody is going to do hit jobs like that on Republicans.

[Bettie]

5. Only to Dems

as to Republicans? No problem.

[bagelsforbreakfast]

6. What has credibility to do with anything anymore?

[dbackjon]

7. Screw her I'm sick of spineless Democrats

I'm sick of spineless Democrats shit like this is why Republicans win and I are destroying my country

She will never get my vote for any higher office she should fucking resign

[Baitball Blogger]

9. I think they are targeting progressives.

[Polly Hennessey]

10. Kirsten Gillibrand is an opportunist.

She did indeed, a year or so ago, tell us she had been sexually harassed by some members of Congress. Sweetheart that she is she declined to name names. How noble. Now that she thinks she smells presidency in the future she is “game on”.