Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,070 posts)
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 05:44 PM Dec 2017

Pierce: I Don't Think the Moral High Ground Exists Anymore

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a14381583/al-franken-resign-moral-high-ground/

I Don't Think the Moral High Ground Exists Anymore
Some thoughts on Al Franken's departure.
By Charles P. Pierce
Dec 7, 2017


I was going to let Dahlia Lithwick’s angry, lucid account in Slate of the end of Al Franken’s senatorial career speak for me, since Lithwick said everything I felt about this tawdry episode, and probably better than I could. Especially this part:

Is this the principled solution? By every metric I can think of, it’s correct. But it’s also wrong. It’s wrong because we no longer inhabit a closed ethical system, in which morality and norm preservation are their own rewards. We live in a broken and corroded system in which unilateral disarmament is going to destroy the very things we want to preserve.


snip//

The problem is where do the Democrats go now, although I’m fairly sure Senator Kirsten Gillibrand will be heading to Iowa. Is it time (again) to tug their forelocks over Bill Clinton? Maybe they could dig up Teddy Kennedy and hold their own Cadaver Synod, expelling him from the Senate posthumously? LBJ would be next, then Jack, then finally Thomas Jefferson. Ah, but now, we are told, they have The Moral High Ground, as though you needed to throw one of your own overboard in order to have the moral standing to oppose seating an alleged child molester in the Senate, or to remind people that the president* copped to sexual assault on tape.

Lithwick is dead right. There is no commonly accepted Moral High Ground left to occupy anymore, and to pretend one exists is to live in a masturbatory fantasyland
. It’s like lining yourself up behind Miss Manners in a political debate against Machiavelli. Until the Democrats are willing to think asymmetrically about the very real political danger posed by the president* and his party, the danger will grow until it becomes uncontrollable, and that point is coming very soon, I fear. By the time the Democrats admit to themselves that their political opposition has moved so far beyond shame that it can’t even see Richard Nixon any more, the damage wrought to our political institutions may be beyond repair.

Oh, and just a reminder, out there touring a book right now are veteran conservative ratfckers Corey Lewandowski and David Bossie. Lewandowski grabbed a female reporter on the campaign trail and Bossie once invaded a hospital room and berated the mother of a young woman who’d committed suicide. You look across a political landscape like the one that the last few decades have created, and the Moral High Ground looks like the lichen-mottled ruins of a dead civilization.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pierce: I Don't Think the Moral High Ground Exists Anymore (Original Post) babylonsister Dec 2017 OP
There is no moral high ground when we're in the sewer. democratisphere Dec 2017 #1
K&R octoberlib Dec 2017 #2
"It's like lining yourself up behind Miss Manners in a political debate against Machiavelli" Wednesdays Dec 2017 #3

Wednesdays

(17,380 posts)
3. "It's like lining yourself up behind Miss Manners in a political debate against Machiavelli"
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:03 PM
Dec 2017

"Political debate?" Even that phrase suggests some sort of niceties are involved. Rather, we're pitting Gandhi and St. Francis on our side against Genghis Khan and Vlad the Impaler on the other.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pierce: I Don't Think the...