Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,591 posts)
Fri Dec 8, 2017, 12:26 AM Dec 2017

To those insisting that Sen. Franken should have had an Ethics Committee hearing...

...be aware that the Ethics Committee only investigates matters relating to conduct as a Senator. The first and the last accusation related to events that occurred before he was elected. The photo events in the middle were never outright denied, so it's not likely that the Ethics Committee would have done much.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
To those insisting that Sen. Franken should have had an Ethics Committee hearing... (Original Post) brooklynite Dec 2017 OP
Where did you hear this? kcr Dec 2017 #1
Unless I'm reading this wrong, it's not true (my bold): Denzil_DC Dec 2017 #2
Thanks. I didn't think that was right. kcr Dec 2017 #4
That link's the "Jurisdiction" page Denzil_DC Dec 2017 #5
When Sen. Vitter was investigated... brooklynite Dec 2017 #8
See the other reply to you here: Denzil_DC Dec 2017 #9
The scope for proper standards of conduct isn't just in the Senate leftstreet Dec 2017 #3
Can u alert a post for misinformation? Nm bagelsforbreakfast Dec 2017 #6
I'm not sure that conclusion is that clear cut. McConnell just said that if Moore wins in Alabama CentralMass Dec 2017 #7

Denzil_DC

(7,242 posts)
2. Unless I'm reading this wrong, it's not true (my bold):
Fri Dec 8, 2017, 12:46 AM
Dec 2017
The Senate Select Committee on Ethics is authorized to receive and investigate allegations of improper conduct which may reflect upon the Senate, violations of law, violations of the Senate Code of Official Conduct and violations of rules and regulations of the Senate; recommend disciplinary action; recommend additional Senate rules or regulations to insure proper standards of conduct; and report violations of law to the proper federal and state authorities.

Senate Resolution 338 (88th Congress), as amended - https://www.ethics.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/jurisdiction

Denzil_DC

(7,242 posts)
5. That link's the "Jurisdiction" page
Fri Dec 8, 2017, 01:05 AM
Dec 2017

It may not be the last word, but as framed, it implies a potentially very broad remit.

brooklynite

(94,591 posts)
8. When Sen. Vitter was investigated...
Fri Dec 8, 2017, 08:28 AM
Dec 2017

...the Committee determined that his behavior with prostitutes was deemed outside the prevue of the Committee because it occurred before he was elected.

leftstreet

(36,108 posts)
3. The scope for proper standards of conduct isn't just in the Senate
Fri Dec 8, 2017, 12:49 AM
Dec 2017

And yes, events occurring before serving are fair game

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»To those insisting that S...