Jeff Sessions wants to crack down on legal weed --- will Congress let him?

[bathroommonkey76]

UPDATE: Congress gave the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer amendment a temporary reprieve after this piece was originally published, extending protections until Dec. 22. Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., responded by saying, "[T]wo weeks is not enough certainty," and adding, "Congress must act to put an end to the cycle of uncertainty and permanently protect state medical marijuana programs — and adult use — from federal interference."

In all the budget and tax negotiations frantically being hammered out on Capitol Hill, one small amendment that might get lost in the shuffle could have huge ramifications. The Rohrabacher-Blumenauer amendment was originally set to expire on Friday (see update above), which would open the door for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to do what he's been hinting he wants to: Launch a federal war on states that have partly or completely legalized marijuana use.

The Rohrabacher-Blumenauer amendment, originally passed as the the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment in 2014, bars the Department of Justice from using federal funds to prosecute people buying or selling medical marijuana in states that have legalized it. It's a popular bipartisan amendment that protects 46 states, but there have been concerns about whether it will be renewed after Sessions exerted pressure in May on Congress to let the amendment die.

Sessions argued that the DOJ's hands need to be untied when it comes to prosecuting marijuana dispensaries, "particularly in the midst of an historic drug epidemic and potentially long-term uptick in violent crime." There is, of course, no evidence that marijuana use is contributing to the opioid crisis and, in fact, there's a significant link between legalized medical marijuana and a decrease in opioid overdoses.

Read more:

https://www.salon.com/2017/12/08/jeff-sessions-wants-to-crack-down-on-legal-weed-will-congress-let-him/?source=newsletter#.WisLAKx7lWk.twitter

[Egnever]

1. At this point

I have little to no faith in congress for anything.

[Wellstone ruled]

2. Clue-------

Sheldon Adelson is the driving force behind the stopping of Legal Weed use in Nevada. He is spending Millions to reverse the Law in our State.

[dchill]

3. Apparently, they'll let him do anything.

[world wide wally]

4. I guess that state's rights only matter when it suits their purpose

Those pesky voters here in Colorado only voted to legallize it. Apparently, Sessions whims can overrule our silly vote.

[misanthrope]

5. Yep, states rights if for foiling "dem civil rightsers"

and keeping the riff raff in their place.

We're on the fast track backwards.

[Angry Dragon]

7. I was thinking the same thing

[onethatcares]

6. "potentially long term uptick in violent crime"

the flip side would be " a potentially downward spiral in violent crime".

like we should believe a potential perjurer. I just don't know anymore, I just don't know.

[Calculating]

8. Doesn't that only protect medical weed

If so, what's stopped him from going after recreational? I'm starting to feel like he just enjoys making us nervous, and wants to keep the 'option on the table' so to speak.