General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDon't forget to watch Rachel tonight....
The Dossier, A TRMS special report @ 9pm ET on MSNBC
lunatica
(53,410 posts)She simply doesn't let anything fade away due to time. I really like that she keeps the story going if it needs it.
Our attention spans are stunted by the modern media who can't keep a story alive for 2 minutes before they're running after a new one.
LisaM
(27,813 posts)The graphic behind her said, "RIPPED UP" and (since I'd missed the very beginning of the show) I had no idea what it referred to because her reporting was very circular. Eventually, after about ten minutes, it turned out it was referring to the fact that many people in Trump's camp had wanted to "rip up" Russian sanctions at one point or another.
I like how much research she does for stories, but her audience is never going to walk away with any talking points. I don't think everything under the sun needs to be reduced to just talking points, but on the other hand, it would be good for the viewer to end up with a drilled down version of her ultimate point.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Because you have all the dots connected.
People will stop talking politics with you for that though, so I get your point.
LisaM
(27,813 posts)She has a habit of re-iterating all the information just before her big wrap up.
I'm not saying I don't like her, I do, but I think she could be slightly more efficient in imparting her stories.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)She's like a good teacher that never stops giving lessons.
I take a break then I happily watch her again.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)They make things stick in my brain, so I like them a lot.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)It's the way I tend to converse politics too.
Politics has long, long connected dots that go back decades sometimes.
I got it from my mother who connected dots that went way back in history. Nothing is isolated in politics.
Siwsan
(26,268 posts)I can deal with a lot of background details when I am reading something but when I am trying to absorb info, on her show, I find myself thinking - wait - didn't she already go over that bit? I wish she would state something, and then move on.
DemRage
(16 posts)!
awesomerwb1
(4,268 posts)I don't think that was a special though.
DemRage
(16 posts)I can't recall what she called it. I just know it was 30 seconds of information jam-packed into 60 overall boring minutes.
Everyone ripped on her after that...even Colbert. Don't care to see that repeated!!
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)This should be good.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)I need something to cheer me up.