Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mrs. Overall

(6,839 posts)
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 03:46 PM Dec 2017

New: Trump officials demand Mueller return thousands of emails

(Just posted on Axios: https://www.axios.com/new-trump-officials-demand-mueller-return-thousands-of-emails-2518147669.html)

Officials of President Trump's transition team plan to ask Special Counsel Robert Mueller to return "many tens of thousands" of transition emails they contend were unlawfully provided to him. But the prosecutor's office says emails being used in the investigation were properly obtained.

What's new: A source close to Trump's transition, which still exists as a legal entity so it can shut down what was once a 1,000-person operation, said the transition will send a letter to Mueller informing him that some of the emails are privileged, and asking for their return. The transition says it is willing to provide Mueller with vetted emails.

The source told me: "What they did is totally illegal, and they need to fix it." But Peter Carr, spokesman for the Special Counsel's Office, told Axios early this morning: "When we have obtained emails in the course of our ongoing criminal investigation, we have secured either the account owner's consent or appropriate criminal process."

Be smart: Republicans, who have been raising increasing questions about Mueller's office, are prepared to argue that if emails were obtained by questionable means, that could taint or undermine the investigation.

73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New: Trump officials demand Mueller return thousands of emails (Original Post) Mrs. Overall Dec 2017 OP
If there is a privilege argument treestar Dec 2017 #1
Exactly. tazkcmo Dec 2017 #4
Prior to inauguration Trump was NOT President--hence NO PRIVILEGE hlthe2b Dec 2017 #14
That too treestar Dec 2017 #21
What else can they say? Cary Dec 2017 #51
The incompetance of the people he has hired Mr.Bill Dec 2017 #55
I think they're claiming lawyer-client privilege, not executive privilege onenote Dec 2017 #23
Yes... maybe. But sounds like Mueller has this locked down. hlthe2b Dec 2017 #24
good point! samnsara Dec 2017 #61
The burden arguably is on Mueller to go to court immediately if he wants to use the material onenote Dec 2017 #30
unless of course... getagrip_already Dec 2017 #43
Federal rules of criminal procedure refer back to FR of Civil Procedure 26 onenote Dec 2017 #47
I think other legalities override this rule in this case. triron Dec 2017 #56
But wouldn't the emails belong to the government, rather than the individuals? kentuck Dec 2017 #57
The emails must be quite damaging to them. nt Irish_Dem Dec 2017 #2
Good luck with that, arguing emails are priviliged.....oh the irony. sunonmars Dec 2017 #3
What will be truly amazing Egnever Dec 2017 #25
its incredulous isnt it.... sunonmars Dec 2017 #32
Do they really want to down a avebury Dec 2017 #5
GSA Deputy Counsel Lowentritt has written proof Trump has zero argument to make: Fred Sanders Dec 2017 #6
If theyve done nothing wrong Thrill Dec 2017 #7
LOL. There is a fucking CONSENT BANNER on all .gov accounts Drahthaardogs Dec 2017 #8
I'd send an intern straight over with a USB drive. sofa king Dec 2017 #9
Yeah, Muellers seen everything, no putting that rabbit back in the box. sunonmars Dec 2017 #10
Then there's that weird thing... sofa king Dec 2017 #22
"Groucho Marxist" Deb Dec 2017 #31
It's a legal move fescuerescue Dec 2017 #67
Exactly. They're so funny. NT enough Dec 2017 #19
Before inauguration, he was NOT President... thus NO privilege hlthe2b Dec 2017 #11
atttorney-client privilege most likely. Sophia4 Dec 2017 #13
still weak case- using GSA, especially with the written agreement in place with the transition. hlthe2b Dec 2017 #17
That privilege fails when there is no reasonable expectation of privacy struggle4progress Dec 2017 #71
Yes. Sophia4 Dec 2017 #72
The Supreme Irony of it. Sophia4 Dec 2017 #12
Right, I think even deplorables will question this njhoneybadger Dec 2017 #33
No they won't, that 33% will just be outraged whenever they're told to be groundloop Dec 2017 #49
How can he claim executive privilege about stuff he did before he was inaugurated? Orrex Dec 2017 #15
The phrase "appropriate criminal process" DeminPennswoods Dec 2017 #16
+1 emulatorloo Dec 2017 #28
My Take Cheviteau Dec 2017 #52
They are doing this to help the investigation? uppityperson Dec 2017 #18
This article omits the Mueller team response, which is that the emails were obtained LEGALLY pnwmom Dec 2017 #20
Demand away, highly-paid liars. emulatorloo Dec 2017 #26
So ironic. Emails.... JDC Dec 2017 #27
bwahahahaha WhiteTara Dec 2017 #29
... 2naSalit Dec 2017 #34
Too Late Boys Me. Dec 2017 #35
The GOP is just going to stand by .99center Dec 2017 #36
Bleach keithbvadu2 Dec 2017 #44
BWahahahahahahaaaa...why didn't Hillary think of that spanone Dec 2017 #37
Mueller got the owners consent Nevernose Dec 2017 #38
So, repubs think that Mueller should have gotten the emails from Russia? Miigwech Dec 2017 #39
What are you hiding, bastards? IluvPitties Dec 2017 #40
Part of the Constitutional crisis Trump is forcing. I think our fate ultimately lies with the SCOTUS jalan48 Dec 2017 #41
Whatcha Hiding Trump Traitors? SeaDoo77 Dec 2017 #42
What part of "NO EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY GRANTED OR IMPLIED" did you not understand? Kablooie Dec 2017 #45
"Hey! Gimme back that bicycle I stole from you!" NBachers Dec 2017 #46
This is the asshole who tells all in private meetings with the Russians. lpbk2713 Dec 2017 #48
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha... Nitram Dec 2017 #50
The game is up for now. Expecting some real criminal effort by drumph now. BSdetect Dec 2017 #53
Man the life boats. safeinOhio Dec 2017 #54
Oh the irony. Downtown Hound Dec 2017 #58
Mueller should send them copies through email. Baitball Blogger Dec 2017 #59
Those idiots don't even seem to understand that Mueller can make copies of them. GoCubsGo Dec 2017 #65
Can't they just call Vlad, demand he hack them back? L. Coyote Dec 2017 #60
good one................. KewlKat Dec 2017 #64
Are these people dumb-asses or what. Thats why its called an investigation Historic NY Dec 2017 #62
So, what gems are hidden within these "thousands" of emails? What did the Mueller team find? KewlKat Dec 2017 #63
BUT, Their emails, their emails!! I hope Russia can find "THEIR" 30,000 emails, The media will be trueblue2007 Dec 2017 #66
The Repukes Should Change ... DoctorJoJo Dec 2017 #68
...Because giving them back erases all memory of the contents??? Like, returning a dinner you just lindysalsagal Dec 2017 #69
Hell-to-the-no SummerSnow Dec 2017 #70
Sure, no problem... Wounded Bear Dec 2017 #73

treestar

(82,383 posts)
21. That too
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 04:09 PM
Dec 2017

How does the Orange Disaster manage to hire so many people who know nothing of the legal system or how it works even if they've passed the bar exam?

Mr.Bill

(24,330 posts)
55. The incompetance of the people he has hired
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 06:00 PM
Dec 2017

is a reflection of how good, qualified people knew better than to sign on to this disaster from the start. The ones that did sign on were either incompetent or corrupted by their greed.

I believe it's why some like Giulliani, Christie and Romney said thanks, but no thanks. I don't like any of them, but they are not stupid or greedy enough to risk their careers on this disaster in the making.

I know the feeling. Even in my simple blue collar career I have turned down lucrative job offers because I saw something illegal or unethical going on. I walked out on a good job in a printing/publishing company because they were printing the union logo on things and they were not a union shop. Leaving that job was a setback financially for me but a leap forward ethically. I don't regret it.

onenote

(42,768 posts)
30. The burden arguably is on Mueller to go to court immediately if he wants to use the material
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 04:26 PM
Dec 2017

If in fact a claim of privilege is being made, Mueller, upon receipt of a demand that specifically identifies the material alleged to be privileged and the basis of that claim, is required to promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and may not use or disclose the information until a court resolves the issue.

getagrip_already

(14,838 posts)
43. unless of course...
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 05:32 PM
Dec 2017

he had a subpoena for the documents and he has a claim that no privilege exists.

From a constitutional standpoint, trump - and his entire court of jesters - was a private citizen until he took the oathe of office. He was not an executive of the US gov't, and he wasn't even an employee of the us gov't.

The only privilege that could have existed would originate from obama.

He can proceed until a federal court stops him, but that burden will be on the transition team, not muehler.

onenote

(42,768 posts)
47. Federal rules of criminal procedure refer back to FR of Civil Procedure 26
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 05:37 PM
Dec 2017

That rule states:

If information produced in discovery is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the party making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The producing party must preserve the information until the claim is resolved.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
57. But wouldn't the emails belong to the government, rather than the individuals?
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 06:16 PM
Dec 2017

Wouldn't the GSA have to be the party making the request for them to be returned? A court would probably have to rule on it?

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
25. What will be truly amazing
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 04:15 PM
Dec 2017

Is the whiplash their base gets now trying to defend hiding emails.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
5. Do they really want to down a
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 03:53 PM
Dec 2017

rabbit hole that might possibly indicate an invalid election win and certify Trump as an illegitimate president? Trump's team really does no tend to think things through.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
6. GSA Deputy Counsel Lowentritt has written proof Trump has zero argument to make:
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 03:53 PM
Dec 2017

BuzzFeed reports:

"Loewentritt read to BuzzFeed News a series of agreements that anyone had to agree to when using GSA materials during the transition, including that there could be monitoring and auditing of devices and that, “Therefore, no expectation of privacy can be assumed.”

https://thinkprogress.org/trump-attack-on-mueller-not-going-well-9ec582859e39/

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
8. LOL. There is a fucking CONSENT BANNER on all .gov accounts
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 03:55 PM
Dec 2017

Specifically stating you have NO expectation of privacy

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
9. I'd send an intern straight over with a USB drive.
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 03:55 PM
Dec 2017

"You, um, asked for the emails back? Here's your copy."

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
22. Then there's that weird thing...
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 04:13 PM
Dec 2017

... where going way back into last year, Trump and his people seem to have a weird misconception that emails are actual individual things... that need to be printed out to exist, or something? Does anyone remember that weird nonsense where it was clear that Trump didn't actually know what an email was?

Is it actually possible that Trump's uninformed authority extended so deep that he ordered the emails to be sifted before they were turned over to the SI? And someone did it? I mean, the stupid is piling up fast in this story but that... that goes straight from Russian-influenced to Groucho Marxist.

Deb

(3,742 posts)
31. "Groucho Marxist"
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 04:34 PM
Dec 2017
I've been wondering the same about paper vs electronic mail in the eyes of the disturbed.

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
67. It's a legal move
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 06:48 PM
Dec 2017

Treating email as physical objects.

Hillary's team actually did the same. When she (initially) handed over her emails to the FBI, she did so in printed form....all 55,000 printed pages.

The law governing physical objects is far far far more established, than the law governing virtual objects. Plus it buries opposing counsel in literal paperwork.

hlthe2b

(102,378 posts)
17. still weak case- using GSA, especially with the written agreement in place with the transition.
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 04:01 PM
Dec 2017
 

Sophia4

(3,515 posts)
12. The Supreme Irony of it.
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 03:59 PM
Dec 2017

I can't believe that the Trump team have the nerve to question law enforcement getting the e-mails.

After all, Mueller can categorize them and subpoena them.

What a laugh!!!!!

It's to STEAL the e-mails of the DNC and of Podesta, but not to obtain the e-mails from the GSA if they belong to the Trump team.

This is too, too, too, too much.

I recall hearing Trump ASK RUSSIA IN A DEBATE TO PUBLISH HILLARY'S MISSING E-MAILS.

This is beyond delicious.

Cheviteau

(383 posts)
52. My Take
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 05:55 PM
Dec 2017

Trump: You stole my emails. I want them back. Do not read them.

Mueller: I'm conducting a counter-intelligence operation. Here's my FISA warrant signed by a Federal judge. You have my permission to read it.
Oh...and eat shit.

uppityperson

(115,681 posts)
18. They are doing this to help the investigation?
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 04:05 PM
Dec 2017
argue that if emails were obtained by questionable means, that could taint or undermine the investigation.


pnwmom

(108,995 posts)
20. This article omits the Mueller team response, which is that the emails were obtained LEGALLY
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 04:08 PM
Dec 2017

either through a criminal process or from the owner of the emails.

If they wanted to have private emails, they shouldn't have been using the GSA system.

WhiteTara

(29,722 posts)
29. bwahahahaha
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 04:23 PM
Dec 2017

what a bunch of fools. What made them think they could commit treason on government email addresses and not be caught? I guess they thought they were totally above the law and that we are so stupid no one would care. Oops.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
38. Mueller got the owners consent
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 05:16 PM
Dec 2017

If those emails were sent and received on .gov accounts, then Mueller has all the consent he needs. They consented when they signed up for it.

And there’s no privilege if it’s in public, which is what a .gov account is.

 

Miigwech

(3,741 posts)
39. So, repubs think that Mueller should have gotten the emails from Russia?
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 05:22 PM
Dec 2017

In that case, they would be legal?

Kablooie

(18,641 posts)
45. What part of "NO EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY GRANTED OR IMPLIED" did you not understand?
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 05:35 PM
Dec 2017

This is what you agree to when you sign up for a .gov account.

If they used .gov for attorney/client emails they have voluntarily waived their attorney/client privileges by using a non-private system.

NBachers

(17,142 posts)
46. "Hey! Gimme back that bicycle I stole from you!"
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 05:36 PM
Dec 2017

This is their Hail Mary to pretend that Muller has done something illegal so they can get rid of him.

lpbk2713

(42,766 posts)
48. This is the asshole who tells all in private meetings with the Russians.
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 05:37 PM
Dec 2017



What more would he have to hide?





/snap ... Anything that would send him to prison.

BSdetect

(8,999 posts)
53. The game is up for now. Expecting some real criminal effort by drumph now.
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 05:57 PM
Dec 2017

He's gotten away with so much already.

Downtown Hound

(12,618 posts)
58. Oh the irony.
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 06:25 PM
Dec 2017

To think that after all this, it comes down to their emails. LOL. I'm actually starting to believe in Karma.

GoCubsGo

(32,094 posts)
65. Those idiots don't even seem to understand that Mueller can make copies of them.
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 06:44 PM
Dec 2017

And, don't they have their own copies of them? They are so mind-bogglingly stupid.

Historic NY

(37,453 posts)
62. Are these people dumb-asses or what. Thats why its called an investigation
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 06:35 PM
Dec 2017

What are you hiding? Screw it Mueller should just make photo copies and send them back.

KewlKat

(5,624 posts)
63. So, what gems are hidden within these "thousands" of emails? What did the Mueller team find?
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 06:39 PM
Dec 2017

I hope it brings the muthers down to their knees and lands them in an orange suit and loss of all the things they've stolen.

To say they would provide "vetted" emails is a crock. Why do they think we have to have this investigation....because they aren't truthful about anything and the team has to dig it out. May DEMOCRACY survive these beasts!

trueblue2007

(17,240 posts)
66. BUT, Their emails, their emails!! I hope Russia can find "THEIR" 30,000 emails, The media will be
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 06:44 PM
Dec 2017

soooooooooooooooooo happy if their emails are found!!!

Isn't that what horrible Trump kept saying???? Mueller got their emails fair and square. He would not do anything illegal.

Trump is the one who is doing the illegal stuff.

 

DoctorJoJo

(1,134 posts)
68. The Repukes Should Change ...
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 07:11 PM
Dec 2017

... their Party symbol from an Elephant to a Hippo, to represent Hippocrites!

lindysalsagal

(20,733 posts)
69. ...Because giving them back erases all memory of the contents??? Like, returning a dinner you just
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 07:13 PM
Dec 2017

ate?

Like, sending back the last meatball and demanding your money back?????

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New: Trump officials dema...