Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Hissyspit

(45,790 posts) Sun Mar 29, 2015, 08:45 PM Mar 2015

Powerful earthquake strikes Papua New Guinea

Source: Associated Press

@AP: BREAKING: Powerful earthquake strikes Papua New Guinea; tsunami warning issued for parts of Pacific.

m.twitter.com/AP

Will update

Read more: Link to source

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Powerful earthquake strikes Papua New Guinea (Original Post) Hissyspit Mar 2015 OP

some more info from USGS.gov - links - 7.7 mag. NRaleighLiberal Mar 2015 #1

links...tsunami warning cancelled, thank goodness! Sedona Mar 2015 #2

Thanks! Hissyspit Mar 2015 #3

from earthquake report .com allan01 Mar 2015 #4

NRaleighLiberal

(61,857 posts)

1. some more info from USGS.gov - links - 7.7 mag.

Reply to Hissyspit (Original post)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 08:46 PM

Mar 2015

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us10001rvu#general_summary

http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/asia/67551264/magnitude-77-quake-hits-near-papua-new-guinea

Sedona

(3,872 posts)

2. links...tsunami warning cancelled, thank goodness!

Reply to Hissyspit (Original post)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 08:47 PM

Mar 2015

http://ptwc.weather.gov/

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us10001rvu#general_summary

Hissyspit

(45,790 posts)

3. Thanks!

Reply to Sedona (Reply #2)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 08:54 PM

Mar 2015

allan01

(1,950 posts)

4. from earthquake report .com

Reply to Hissyspit (Original post)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 09:19 PM

Mar 2015

http://earthquake-report.com/2015/03/30/massive-earthquake-new-britain-region-p-n-g-on-march-29-2015/

Reply to this discussion