Rand Paul Said He Doesn’t Believe In The Concept Of Gay Rights
Source: BuzzFeed
Sen. Rand Paul said he doesnt buy into the concept of gay rights because they are defined by a gay persons lifestyle.
I dont think Ive ever used the word gay rights, because I dont really believe in rights based on your behavior, the Kentucky Republican told reporters in a videotaped interview that has received little attention since it was recorded in 2013.
But its unclear how far and to whom Paul extends the argument that rights cannot be defined by behavior.
Practicing religion, for example, is a behavior enshrined as a primary American right. Free speech is behavior protected by the Bill of Rights.
Read more: http://www.buzzfeed.com/dominicholden/rand-paul-doesnt-believe-in-the-concept-of-gay-rights?bftw&utm_term=4ldqpgc#.hr7y9Y7yJ2
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Senator squirrel hair doesn't believe in anyone' rights but his own right to not be a board certified eye doctor.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Squirrels everywhere are offended.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)Where free markets correct discrimination. I believe he is more naive than evil.
Pure free market libertarians are like communists. Great theory. Stupid in practice.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)societies? Societies that do NOT punish others for things such as prostitution and smoking weed.
Why does Ayn Rand Paul want to allow Christians to punish their LGBT brothers and sisters? Should we allow Jews to discriminate against Christians or vice versa? I guess the Laissez-faire is only for economics and NOT for society at large. I think Ayn Rand just turned over in her grave. She really did hate religion and Christians for their social restrictions on behavior.
MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)They do.
And this law is Laissez-faire. Basically, if your religion requires you to be a bigot, you are free to do so, subject to market forces.
It has an intellectual appeal, in that you would think a crappy business like this would cease to operate.
But, alas, there are enough bigots in the world, that they would probably favor such a business over another -- witness Chick Fil-A did great when the boycott when into effect.
If there would be ample choices for people, I'd probably let people be bigots, as it would give me the opportunity to take my business elsewhere.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)not a libertarian
fasttense
(17,301 posts)How can he betray her like this?
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)geardaddy
(24,931 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)None of them get it. They are all dinosaurs.
appalachiablue
(41,161 posts)use a rest, us too.
Moostache
(9,897 posts)The entire clown car of GOP candidates is enough to make me violently wretch for days already and its not even JUNE!!!
Carson and his "prison turns you gay" lines...Walker and Christie in Britain doing their level best to look like jackasses when asked a simple question about evolution that is settled fact for most of the sentient non-addled minds on the planet...the candidates jumping all over each other to back Indiana's "Hate the Gays. It's OK" law...
I am furious that these scum sucking dogs gerrymandered the Congress to take control of the country and run us smack into every single metaphorical iceberg on the sea.
History will remember them all for the craven lunatics they are...the real question is can they be stopped in time to salvage civilization as we know it?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)No matter how hard they try to freeze us in place.
They don't see time as a linear thing, more like a cement.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)This apple fell quite a ways from the tree. Rand Paul is not nearly as clever as his father. He steps on a cow pie just about every time he opens his mouth. I guess he sees free speech, freedom of assembly, freedom to own firearms, and all the others libertarians love so much, as natural endowments from our Creator, just as the preamble says. Muddled thinking. I wonder when his libertarian fans will recognize and admit the awful truth, that this guy is just not very bright.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)as a libertarian.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)That means Big Business shouldn't have any laws to stop them from doing anything they want.
The rest of us?
We can't be free with our naughty bits.
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)And he won't be president as he's a pander hack and just as narrow minded as many Evangelical Christians.
Remember what he thought about the Civil Right Act. We know where he stands on issues like this.
niyad
(113,496 posts)sadly, I do not believe in the concept of rand paul as an actual human being.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)mountain grammy
(26,640 posts)He's a certified clown.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)A behavior? What does he think fundy Christianity is?
herding cats
(19,566 posts)What he meant to say was he doesn't believe in equal rights for those damn gay people. The very concept offends him and the others who share his bigotry. Say what you mean for once. You're a bigoted ass, it's obvious, now own it.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Shrike47
(6,913 posts)Homosexuality is a 'behavior?' what does he think fundy Christianity is?
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)They think being gay is a choice. Senator Paul I hate to be the one to inform ya but if you can choose to sexually aroused by another man you are are homosexual and/or bisexual.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)I've even offered money to anyone who can choose to be gay.
It hasn't cost me a penny.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)Because that is what most people want no matter what special interest group they are in. EQUAL human rights for all. It gets named for particular groups when those groups are singled out for special UNequal treatment - denying marriage rights to some, random killings of others, denial of education or jobs or places to live or voting privileges, etc.
But at the heart, the fight has always been for equal rights.
Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)and a choice.
Does little Randy think that religion deserves no rights?
Can't have it both ways, you dirt bag.
niyad
(113,496 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)I wonder if he disagrees with the 13th-15th Amendments as "government overreaches" as Ron Paul does?
I bet I know the answer.
Homophobia cloaked in patriotism is still homophobia.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)livetohike
(22,156 posts)Yavin4
(35,445 posts)When? Just because you're against some wars and for legalization of pot, that does not make you Libertarian.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Because many rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights are essentially based on behavior.
Speech, religion, assembly are all behaviors.
Bearing arms is not inherent in being human. It is a lifestyle choice.
Only in Tea Party America can he be considered a legitimate Presidential candidate. Thanks Ronnie Reagan and George W. Bush for lowering the bar for candidates.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)Why would anyone be surprised at this?
Larry Engels
(387 posts)Then he would be opposed to hate crimes laws protecting gays, too, I guess.
nolabear
(41,990 posts)I think he's a muppet.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)And I'll say it again : Fuck Rand Paul
tclambert
(11,087 posts)I may be wrong, but I think gun ownership is a choice. I don't think you're born that way.
Cosmocat
(14,566 posts)right?
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)DinahMoeHum
(21,802 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)Rothbard said it was more immoral to tax people to keep a retarded child alive than to let the kid die through neglect
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Gawd I hate this guy...he is a prime example of exactly what is WRONG with America and the world.
Fuck off, Asshole!
DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)...shouldn't be forced to serve niggers, either.
Ok, ok, he didn't say "niggers" outright... but he totally said niggers.
Response to DRoseDARs (Reply #43)
wordpix This message was self-deleted by its author.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)He certainly made it clear he thinks it's the business owner who should decide who's sitting at the lunch counter, and not the federal gov
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Response to DRoseDARs (Reply #43)
wordpix This message was self-deleted by its author.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)LeftishBrit
(41,208 posts)For example, few people actually think, with regard to race, that people don't have a right to belong to a different race than themselves. The question of rights comes up with regard to behaviour: do people of different races have the right to vote, and live in the same place as you, and sit at the front of the bus, and get equal pay for equal work, etc.? Classic racist attitude: 'I've nothing against them, so long as they know their place!' Same for women: no one thinks that people don't have a right to be women, but many think that women don't have the same behavioural rights as men: to work in the same jobs and get the same pay and have a choice about planning their families; in some places, even to vote or go to school or drive a car or go out without their husbands.
If you deny people freedom of behaviour (aside from actions that actually harm others), then you are denying them rights!
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Title corrected, and you're quite welcome.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)and keep pretending Paul represents a new kind of Republican
MADem
(135,425 posts)filthy squirrel pelt atop his head is a good look! That behavior goes to simple judgment!
Can't believe the moron went there with a "lifestyle" argument, either. What is "the gay lifestyle?" Go to work? Pay bills? Mow the lawn? Watch tee vee?
I think we need to know more about the potentially nefarious "lifeSTYLE" (cue portentous music...) of legislators who spend all day on the Hill but don't do a single thing for We, The People....
merrily
(45,251 posts)If someone had asked Paul if he believed in equal rights, what would he have said? Yes (whether he does or not, he would have HAD to say yes).
Then the next question should have been For members of the LGBT community, or only for heterosexuals?
I have no idea what his answer would have been to the second question, but he was given way too easy an out.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)he doesn't believe in the concept of Rand Paul.
Gothmog
(145,435 posts)Whed did he decide to be straight?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Funny ... that was my exact first thought when I read that, "rights cannot be defined by behavior", uh .. line. Hell, everything IN the Bill of Right concerns behaviors.
Initech
(100,093 posts)Two can play this game.
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Bartlet
(172 posts)Like choosing to be a Christian? So he's not in favor of those rights?
sinkingfeeling
(51,469 posts)calimary
(81,388 posts)("this" being the whole "MY Religion Trumps Your Rights" thing, in Indiana AND beyond).
Well, maybe yesterday afternoon/evening, and this morning he's silent. BUT WE KNOW WHERE HE STANDS. We already know. Just watching Rachel Maddow try to get something definitive out of him a few years ago when he danced all over her repeated questions about establishing a BASIC understanding of his stand on civil rights NOW. TODAY. In the second decade of the 21st Century. And he kept falling back on --- "oh the gummnt the gummnt the gummnt - keep the gummnt out -" "So then you think a restaurant owner should have the right to deny service to black people?" "Oh the gummnt the gummnt the gummnt..." "But DO YOU THINK businesses should have the right to deny service to black people?" "Oh the gummnt the gummnt the gummnt hate the gummnt, gummnt shouldn't have any role, no right to step in, freedom-freedom... blah-blah-blah..."
He never answered her question - WHICH IN AND OF ITSELF IS INDEED AN ANSWER TO HER QUESTION. So we know where he stands. Government should butt out of business's lives and if they don't want to serve blacks in their restaurants, that's their right, but but but - and the flaccid "well, I wouldn't eat there, but they have the right to do that if they want to but but but..." Yeah. We know, rand. We get it. And we get YOU much better and more clearly than you think. Most of us on this side are NOT snowed by you or anything you say or claim or anything about which you try to tiptoe through the tulips.
TRANSLATION: SO HE DOES think it's okay for business and anybody else to discriminate based on their religion. He DOES. He's keeping his head down in the foxhole at the moment because he doesn't deal with the shit he knows would rain down on him, and Heaven forbid more of those Rachel Maddow-style interviews, the way the shit has rained down on mike pence and started to in Arkansas with Governor Persecute-Bill-Clinton-during-the-Monica-thing. (Think we forgot that, ASSa?)
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)bhHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!1!1!!!!!!
alfredo
(60,075 posts)Eric Stratton
(19 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Right to assemble, to publish, to speak, to change one's choice of religions, to reject all religions, and in fact the right to make a colossal fool of one's self in the political arena.
Trillo
(9,154 posts)So, he doesn't think if you follow the law (a behavior), you have the right to be free?
Cha
(297,446 posts)that MoFo as POTUS.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)BigDemVoter
(4,153 posts)used after the word, "gay", I know something obnoxious and idiotic will follow.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Somewhere there's a cartoon depicting this.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)Homosexuals are human to and so should be afforded the same rights that I am. If a woman and I are attracted to each other, we can choose to get married. Homosexuals should be allowed to get married to their partners too because they are just as human as I am. It's not a difficult concept. People like Rand Paul though have to constantly perform mental gymnastics to make their bigotry seem like it's not a violation of our constitution.