Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,899 posts)
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 05:43 AM Apr 2015

(Illinois) Unions must be paid dues while 'fair share' case plays out, judge rules

Source: Chicago Tribune

A downstate judge ruled Friday that Gov. Bruce Rauner's administration must give dues paid by nonmembers to unions while a legal challenge on the issue plays out.

Rauner had issued an executive order seeking to block the so-called "fair share" fees, but unions sued to overturn the edict. They asked a judge to free up the money pending the outcome of the case, which Associate Judge Christopher Kolker of St. Clair County Circuit Court granted Friday.

"We continue to believe that the governor's executive order is meant to weaken the right of state employees to have effective union representation," Illinois AFL-CIO President Michael Carrigan said in a statement. "We're pleased that all fair share agreements will now be honored while our legal challenge is pending."

A spokesman for Rauner said the move was part of an agreement the administration struck with unions to give them access to the money in exchange for an expedited timeline to move the case along.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/politics/ct-illinois-unions-ruling-met-0411-20150410-story.html



By Monique Garcia
Chicago Tribune
APRIL 10, 2015 9:39 PM | SPRINGFIELD
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(Illinois) Unions must be paid dues while 'fair share' case plays out, judge rules (Original Post) Eugene Apr 2015 OP
One and out. mikekohr Apr 2015 #1
Kicked! ibewlu606 Apr 2015 #2
Good for the unions! sueh Apr 2015 #3
This is good for unions Oldtimeralso Apr 2015 #4
K&R Stellar Apr 2015 #5
 

ibewlu606

(160 posts)
2. Kicked!
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 09:33 AM
Apr 2015

It is ony fair that a person who is represented by a union, help fund their representation. I was speaking to a colleague yesterday who was telling me how his local ran a campaign to represent a group of 40 linemen. They won the election, and signed a contract with benefits, better pay and working conditions. Then all 40 refused to join the union even after all the union got them. That is what it is like to be a union organizer in "right to work" Florida.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»(Illinois) Unions must be...