Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 09:35 PM Apr 2015

WTO rules against U.S. dolphin-safe canned tuna labels

Source: Yahoo! News / Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The World Trade Organization found on Tuesday that U.S. rules on dolphin-safe labels for canned tuna run counter to international trade laws, siding with Mexico in a long-running dispute and opening the door to retaliation against U.S. exports.

The ruling, which the United States said it would appeal, upholds Mexico's complaint that revamped U.S. labeling rules are still discriminatory because they disqualify Mexican tuna from bearing dolphin-safe labels, unlike other countries' tuna.

"We recommend that the dispute settlement body request the United States bring its measure, which we have found to be inconsistent with (the WTO rules) ... into conformity with its obligations," the WTO panel said.

In a statement, Mexico's economy ministry applauded the WTO decision, adding it could eventually take measures against the United States if any possible appeal process were to back the latest resolution.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/wto-rules-against-u-dolphin-safe-canned-tuna-142117651.html

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. he TPP will just ramp this stuff up.
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 09:37 PM
Apr 2015

No country of origin labels, Mmmmmm - filthy Vietnamese shrimp!

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
3. Under the TPP ISDS provisions they will likely be able to sue for anything. I can contrive an
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 09:48 PM
Apr 2015

argument against almost any consumer protection rule, framed as a lost profits argument. Lawyers and corporations with the possibility of extorting vastly increased profits will be way more motivated and tediously sleazy in their quest for endless profits.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
4. I hesitate to look up other rulings made by that court.
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 09:59 PM
Apr 2015

Free trade is everything critics said it would be.

 

MJJP21

(329 posts)
5. Dolphin safe
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 10:01 PM
Apr 2015

I don't want the tuna can to say "dolphin safe" . I want the tuna can to say "dolphin free". Sometimes I really don't think tuna is in the can.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
9. I read here that some of it isn't tuna, it's monkfish. Another reason not to buy slave produced Thai
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 10:58 PM
Apr 2015
seafood products. There are other reasons to not buy seafood, too.

 

Geronimoe

(1,539 posts)
8. I thought the WTO had ended
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 10:34 PM
Apr 2015

They sure don't have their meetings like they use to after Seattle protests.

Anyway. consumers can still boycott canned dolphins.

President Bill Clinton paved the way for China to join the WTO.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
10. Why is the US standing up for this labeling but we can't get GMO labeling?
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 10:58 PM
Apr 2015

Of beef labeling? I remember a story about a rancher who was not allowed to label his beef as being from from Mad Cow Disease because other ranchers were complaining it made their beef look bad.

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
17. It's all about the profits and nothing about the health (of anything).
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 09:25 AM
Apr 2015

Purely on the profits (and hence the bribe level from the industry that "persuades" the politicians).

And yes, this is going to spiral downwards with the every popular TPP scam being pushed through.

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
12. Why would it be wrong to label the country of origin for meat?
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 11:28 PM
Apr 2015

Besides some countries feeds hormones to their cattle, and there ought to be a chance to opt out if you don’t like artificial hormones in your meat.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
13. I didn't like the loss of COO either. The claim at link is the standards will the same,
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 11:44 PM
Apr 2015
which is the point of advocates of COO labeling, but from the other direction, which a careful read will show.

I fortunately live in an area where, while our state does not mandate organic labeling, still consumer choice is powerful. We get COO labeling if we look for it, and are big on more local foods grown in our state or Oregon. I won't eat anything from China, which is labeled here, or even Mexico. The discerning shopper knows where to look if they can.

Those who don't care, or can't pick because they can't afford to, must take whatever they can get. Food is expensive here. We also have a short growing season, not even sun and sometimes because of the cool and damp weather, produce rots before it is near ripeness.

We are so far removed from a simpler system with the global food system. I hate it and hink a lot of it is JUNK and NOT green in the long run with all that shipping. But people demand foods completely out of season and that means it will be foreign grown.

I think the food situation is a big mess, you have to be very selective if you can, to be able to afford it and to go and get it all. Much more complicated than in years past. We also have great consumer demand for non-GMO foods, so they are available, for those who choose.

I end up with things grown in our state, CA or OR, at times from B.C. or Australia. They have the USDA and nutrition facts on the labels, even from Australia. You take your chances with the food from China.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
14. Because to do so might make consumers decide to not buy that meat, if they
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 11:45 PM
Apr 2015

believe it has growth hormones, for example. Basically, corporations are stacking this particular deck so that nothing on a label would inform a buyer of anything except what is in the package. Nothing about country of origin, GMO, whatever. Right now I won't buy shrimp from Vietnam - or anyone around there - because I have read about the filthy conditions the shrimp are raised in. With the TPP, shrimp would not be labeled as coming from Vietnam, so I would either have to trust that the shrimp is clean, or just not buy shrimp, or get my shrimp mail ordered from somewhere safe.

It is all about profits.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»WTO rules against U.S. do...