Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,653 posts)
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 07:29 PM Apr 2015

Rauner: Stop 'fair share' fees for non-union teachers

Source: BND

BY JOHN O'CONNOR

SPRINGFIELD, ILL. — Gov. Bruce Rauner said Wednesday that he'll try to banish a requirement that non-union public school teachers pay union fees even as he struggles for court approval to relieve thousands of his state employees of the same obligation.

Speaking to an early morning crowd in downtown Springfield, the Republican said he's had support, even from state-worker union members, for his fight against what he calls "forced union-dues collection," an issue that sent unions to court against the idea. And he contended that teachers have asked him whether the executive order he signed in February could be extended to the schoolhouse.

"I believe it should apply to teachers and we'll deal with that later," Rauner said.

Rauner declined to elaborate when asked by The Associated Press as he left the event sponsored by the Citizens Club of Springfield. Asked again later in East Peoria, he said he's confident he'll prevail in a court case over the state employees' fees and a court decision "could have broader implications to all government employees and taxpayer-funded entities just like schools."

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://www.bnd.com/2015/04/22/3778384/rauner-stop-fair-share-fees-for.html

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rauner: Stop 'fair share' fees for non-union teachers (Original Post) Omaha Steve Apr 2015 OP
right wingers HATE organized labor... mike_c Apr 2015 #1
I'm on the executive committee NJCher Apr 2015 #6
Unions raised hundreds of millions of dollars for Obama in 2008 hack89 Apr 2015 #8
If they don't want to pay, there has got to be a way to cut them from benefiting from SoapBox Apr 2015 #2
NOPE Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #3
Rauner infuriates me! City Lights Apr 2015 #4
Ruiner is my name and ruining the middle class is my game! Thekaspervote Apr 2015 #5
I like it. murielm99 Apr 2015 #7

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
1. right wingers HATE organized labor...
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 07:43 PM
Apr 2015

...and they're more than happy to create a whole class of freeloaders who want union wages and benefits without having to pay for union representation and the costs of negotiating on their behalf.

You don't have to join the union if you don't want to. But don't take a union job if you're not willing to pay your fair share for the efforts that make union jobs so desirable. A freeloader is just one step up from a scab, IMO. And it's a small step up.

NJCher

(35,675 posts)
6. I'm on the executive committee
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 10:36 PM
Apr 2015

Of my teacher's union, and I can attest to the amount of work that goes into negotiating a contract. Even when the contract is ratified, there are still grievances and issues where the administration violates the contract and action has to be taken. This is an ongoing job, and it takes a lot of research, collaboration, and time.

For people to obtain the benefits of this without footing some of the cost is so wrong; wrong, wrong, wrong.


Cher

hack89

(39,171 posts)
8. Unions raised hundreds of millions of dollars for Obama in 2008
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 07:32 AM
Apr 2015

the repukes see this as a political battle - smaller unions means less money to Democrats running for office.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
2. If they don't want to pay, there has got to be a way to cut them from benefiting from
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 07:59 PM
Apr 2015

the work that the Union has negotiated.

Maybe they will simply have to work under "guidelines" issued by the state or district.

Omaha Steve

(99,653 posts)
3. NOPE
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 08:03 PM
Apr 2015

The union also has to represent them if they have a grievance, are getting written up or fired, etc. It is in the NLRB act. Just one sentence makes right to scab er work legal. Repeal that one sentence (like if they had stuck it in the ACA with all those pages....)

murielm99

(30,741 posts)
7. I like it.
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 02:42 AM
Apr 2015

A good nickname for him is long overdue.

I can't wait to tell my brother. He will get a good laugh out of it.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rauner: Stop 'fair share'...