Senate panel approves 'fast track' trade bill
Source: USA Today
WASHINGTON -- A top Senate panel approved legislation to renew presidential "fast track" authority that would enhance President Obama's ability to negotiate a pending trade pact with Asia-Pacific nations.
The Senate Finance Committee voted, 20-6, Thursday evening to send the bill to the full Senate, but only after a defiant act by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., to delay the hearing by invoking an antiquated Senate scheduling rule that pushed back committee action for hours.
Sanders is a leading liberal opponent of both fast track and the underlying Trans-Pacific Partnership and is considering a run for president.
"This job-killing trade deal has been negotiated in secret," Sanders said, "It was drafted with input by special interests and corporate lobbyists but not from the elected representatives of the American people."
Read more: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/04/22/senate-finance-fast-track-approval/26195137/
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Goodness we are in trouble. I think this mess is going to pass. Gosh this is awful.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)No.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)and I'm retired. I hope this government give-away goes down in flames and takes the ass holes who've promoted it with it.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)floor.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)it's about our fellow Americans - even the ones disconnected from the nuts 'n bolts of our country - it's about our pride and the visions of those who set this experiment in freedom on it's way into the future. And I'll be DAMNED if I'll stand silently while it sinks under the weight of unabashed GREED!
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)I'm for TPP assuming it's a good deal. From what I've heard so far, I think it will be. If not, Obama won't endorse it.
We need these type of alliances and trade agreements.
We won't be doing future generations -- the ones that will actually be paying our social security -- any good by hamstringing them while the world passes us by. Good or bad, most of our kids and grand kids will work for corporations. Hopefully they'll infuse a more socially conscious managers and investors; but whatever, that's where the good paying jobs will be, not some mom-and-pop flower shop, or flea market. We won't progress -- in terms of education, health care, money for job training, welfare, etc. -- trading among ourselves.
I also think the TPP will improve conditions in poorer countries -- that's good from a humanistic standpoint and creates new markets for our special expertise. It will create jobs here, even if the employees are often working overseas building and doing big things.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)This is an effort to put every nation on earth on one level of "prosperity". A world serfdom. I'm not ready to reassure my future lineage that they'll make less but enjoy it more. ....... Wait! Didn't I go to war to stem the tide of JUST such a movement? And NOW we're gonna turn ourselves over voluntarily??? Over my dead body.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)back.
You do realize that some poor people here would be viewed as a 1%er to most of the world.
Renew Deal
(81,881 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Owl
(3,644 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)It will probably pass congress as well.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)And by the time we vote them out of office it will be law and won't make a bit of difference because money will take care of the ones that lose their seat for the vote.
That is exactly how corruption works for the corruptors.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)project_bluebook
(411 posts)and I thought slick willie was bad.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)Democrats
Charles E. Schumer »
NY
Debbie Stabenow »
MI
Maria Cantwell »
WA
Bill Nelson »
FL
Robert Menendez »
NJ
Thomas R. Carper »
DE
Benjamin L. Cardin »
MD
Sherrod Brown »
OH
Michael F. Bennet »
CO
Robert P. Casey, Jr. »
PA
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Except for Bennet, all of them have large seaports in their states.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)Not on the voter registration books, but that's what he is in fact.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)... to prove his Repuglican bonafides.
That was then; this is now.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)registered Democrats in CO have stepped forward to challenge him.
There are three Republicans running.
rpannier
(24,340 posts)Cantwell and Carper were listed in the USA Today article
annm4peace
(6,119 posts)I watched Cspan for awhile and they were voting on amendments to the fast track (Or that is what i thought was happening)
I thought Sherrod Brown and Bob Casey were progressives.
thesquanderer
(11,995 posts)That is a list of dems on the committee, not a list of people who voted for it.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)Surprise surprise. They'll get to marginalize the 99 percent further with no penalty.
This doesn't get the democratic senators off the hook though.
Despicable.
Beauregard
(376 posts)And a similar deal with Europe is imminent.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30493297
closeupready
(29,503 posts)I think EW could, too, but she's not running.