Sanders Presser May Flout Ethics Rules
Source: Roll Call
Running for president is hard. But its even harder to do while balancing the ethics rules of your day job on Capitol Hill.
Its a lesson Sen. Bernard Sanders, I-Vt., is learning the day after he told The Associated Press hes running for president in 2016.
Sanders was scheduled to hold a news conference Thursday at noon at the Senate Radio/TV gallery where he will discuss his agenda for America. By holding the event the day after he made his presidential hopes official, the vast majority of the questions at the event are likely to be about his campaign and national platform. And that walks a fine line of breaking Senate ethics rules, which prohibit campaigning of any kind in the Capitol complex.
But about two hours before the presser was scheduled to start, Sanders office announced a location change. The event would be held outside the Capitol, in the Senate Swamp.
Read more: http://atr.rollcall.com/bernie-sanders-2016-announcement-ethics/
blackspade
(10,056 posts)The tare-down by the M$M begins.
Obviously someone on his staff was 'Johnny on the spot' and moved this BEFORE it was an 'ethics violation,' but the M$M still couches it as "May Flout Ethics Rules."
What a disgusting, shitty media we have, full of ethically challenged assholes that can't be bothered to report actual news.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)n/t
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Hope you get the a host position in the Sanders Group!
blackspade
(10,056 posts)appalachiablue
(41,174 posts)placed together- definitely appropriate.
Bernie Sanders, America's Senator for The People!!
-Appa
IDemo
(16,926 posts)It was nice while it lasted, Bernie.
RiverNoord
(1,150 posts)Bernieghazi!!!!!
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)Which is a problem for the Masters of the media.
So, cooking the title is a way to draw in viewers and discredit someone seen as a problem
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)This is such a non issue.
TheNutcracker
(2,104 posts)MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)The media is going to be working overtime trying to find dirt on Bernie. This first attempt is laughable.
madokie
(51,076 posts)Bernie is no spring chicken, hell he isn't any kind of a chicken. He's the real fucking deal
Like he said don't underestimate me.
William Seger
(10,779 posts)Did you read the article, or just the OP?
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)My confidence in my statement comes from several factors.
First, for the powers that be to catch the Senator who constantly berates them on their moral failing and questionable ethics in an ethics violation at the very start of his run to the top is a Machiavellian wet dream. Too easy.
Second, For a long term Washington political player and staff of to not know the many pitfalls on the path to the oval office and take steps to avoid them is very hard to believe.
Third, the source
[M]"Money must be used for the purpose for which it is appropriated. Everything up here is paid for by official funds so all things we do must be official, the aide said.
Ah, the ubiquitous anonymous Senatorial aide, quoted using language which implies (or seems to) something without confirmation of any sort. As to "well known tenet"; a tenet is a tradition or belief, not a law or rule; so it lacks legal standing. As to the "money "portion of the quoted statement; why was it not presented as using governmental resources for personal reason? Why phrase it as mishandling of money in general? Could it be to attack Senator Sanders as a member of the Budget Committee?
I have no idea of the political leanings of the writers or their publisher; I think I have a fairly good handle on the political leaning of their "source".
I have been wrong countless times before, But I have confidence in this.
Kingofalldems
(38,485 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)M$M will stoop as low as needs be to try and discredit Sanders. His major sin is not that he is a socialist or that he will embarrasses the ruling class, but rather that he lacks the money to spend lavishly on M$M.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)on Sanders, some really good stuff I think. But, it will turn a lot of voters off, including a chunk of Democrats. We'll just have to see whether Sanders can overcome the Kucinich "Keebler Elf" -- as one DU Sanders supporter aptly put it -- persona.
I don't know, but Carter sorta of did it. Of course, Carter was not a scary "socialist" and held a lot of red state ideas at the time.
Me personally, I'd love to see us like a Scandinavian country, but I don't want to lose the next election because a lot of voters freak out over the thought (or lack of understanding and thought).
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/21/magazine/21Sanders.t.html?pagewanted=all
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)A corporate shyster who usually specializes in filing SLAPP suits?
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)He moved the Presser to an moved approriate location. What Ethics Rules were violated? None.
The M$M is doing the bidding of the 1% already as they view Senator Bernie Sanders as a Threat.
He is Threat to the Status Quo and Thank God Bernie is Running for President!!!
William Seger
(10,779 posts)... so it's definitely covered by the ethics rule. The only question is whether this presser should be considered campaigning, and it probably should be. He should have moved it elsewhere so there would be no question. I hate to see Bernie misstep this early.
red dog 1
(27,857 posts)I support Bernie Sanders for President; but this "presser" should be held somewhere else,
someplace that is not an "official resource"...and thus not covered by the ethics rule.
From the Roll Call article cited in the OP:
"The Senate Swamp can only be reserved by members of Congress -- not public demonstrators or candidates.
Jason Botelho, media relations coordinator for the Senate Radio-TV Gallery said other locations on the Capital grounds could be booked through the Capital Police.'
"Official resources (Senate space, equipment, staff time, and supplies) should not be used to assist campaign organizations," read the rules posted to the Senate Ethic's Committee's website.
The Republicans will probably jump all over him for this.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)It's a corner of the capital grounds. Public property.
William Seger
(10,779 posts)... and my point, again, is that I hate to see Bernie make unforced errors like this. And really, the only reason I posted was because so many people seemed to be pouncing on their keyboards after reading the misleading OP, without reading the article.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)appalachiablue
(41,174 posts)possible since they hate it. It's risky, but saves money and is cheaper than renting a room, for all 30 of them. The other alternatives are to hang out at night with the homeless people in downtown DC or folks living under Key Bridge in Georgetown. But they'd be uncomfortable with that. So, the US Capitol 'Senate Swamp' it is.
The reporter who wrote this piece is obviously familiar with it.
red dog 1
(27,857 posts)Uncle Bernie should have thought this one out better,
but, IMO, he is still the Democrats' best chance to defeat the GOP next year.