Harry Reid Plans To Block Trade Deal Until The Senate Deals With Surveillance Reform,Highway Funding
Source: Huffington Post
WASHINGTON -- Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is putting the brakes on a Senate effort to push through a controversial trade deal, saying that Democrats will block the measure until the Senate deals first with a stalled infrastructure bill and a package of reforms to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, known as FISA.
"We have two very complicated issues that I think should have strong consideration before we even deal with trade," Reid said in an interview with The Huffington Post, referencing the two measures that are set to expire unless the Senate takes action.
Reid said he has spoken with his leadership team and is confident Democratic senators will stick together to demand the two bills be dealt with before moving to approval for trade promotion authority or the Trans-Pacific Partnership. "I'm not willing to lay over and play dead on trade until we have some commitment from them on surface transportation," he said.
The same goes for FISA, he said, arguing the Senate should adopt a package of reforms in the House. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has pushed instead for a five-year extension of the current surveillance policy, without any reforms. "I'm not willing to simply let anyone move to FISA without a fight unless I have some idea of what they're going to do with it," Reid said.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/04/harry-reid-tpp_n_7208076.html
I have to admit, this hostage-taking stuff is kinda neat, when the hostage isn't worth saving.
djean111
(14,255 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and FISA reform.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Because I do not believe for one second that the NSA is really truly going to stop doing anything that they want to do, and I also doubt that real infrastructure spending will actually happen. And if it does, the money will come out of "entitlement" programs, and Obama has also proposed privatizing infrastructure to an extent. Sorry to be so cynical, but then - I can read and remember.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)On the TPP, I find myself unable to form an opinion for or against due to the secrecy involved. But I do oppose buying a pig in a poke.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)"I'm not willing to lay over and play dead on trade until we have some commitment from them on surface transportation," he said.
In other words, he'll be willing to lay over and play dead on trade as soon as he gets a commitment on surface transportation.
We know, Harry. Give 'em, er, heck, Harry.
on point
(2,506 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)That accident knocked some resolve into him?
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Beauregard
(376 posts)Old Harry. Ironic, isn't it?
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Mitch did this to us when he was in the minority too.
Harry is paying the favor back in the most bi-partisan way!
n2doc
(47,953 posts)"Of course we've heard of an attempt to stand in the way of an effort to pass this bipartisan legislation," McConnell said of the trade bill on the Senate floor.
But he added, "I plan, with the support of members of both parties, to turn to the bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act once we finish the Iran bill."
Reid, speaking just after McConnell, did not say he would seek to delay the trade bill. But he said it was important to handle measures on highway funding and domestic surveillance before a Senate recess at the end of this month.