Native American tribes oppose hunting of Yellowstone-area grizzlies
Source: Yahoo! News / Reuters
SALMON, Idaho (Reuters) - Native American tribes said on Friday they oppose U.S. government plans to strip grizzly bears in the Yellowstone National Park area of federal safeguards, ultimately opening the way for sport hunting of them in northern Rocky Mountain states.
A federal-state-tribal panel that oversees grizzlies in and around the park, which spans parts of Wyoming, Montana and Idaho, has said for the past two years the bear population had come back from the brink of extinction and no longer needed protections under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
But tribal members of the Yellowstone Ecosystem Subcommittee have since joined with other Indian Nations to demand talks with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service before it officially proposes removing bears in the area from the federal list of endangered and threatened species.
James Walks Along, the tribal historic preservation officer for the Northern Cheyenne Nation in Montana, said on Friday his is one of 33 tribes that oppose handing management of the bears to the three Northern Rocky Mountain states, where sport hunting is planned.
Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/native-american-tribes-oppose-hunting-yellowstone-area-grizzlies-012231456.html
ailsagirl
(22,897 posts)STRONGLY!
Orrex
(63,212 posts)Oh, wait. A bunch of assholes invaded and tried to exterminate them.
That's what illegal immigration will get you...
illegal immigration started in 1492.
Diremoon
(86 posts)Only assholes kill things for sport.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)Sparhawk60
(359 posts)....with crossbows. I wonder what the kill ratio would be with single shot crossbow vs. Grizzly Bear. I do bet that the popularity of hunting grizzly bears will die down.
/get it? "die down"
// har har
yadig
(11 posts)One of my all time favorite movies is Little Big Man. Satire is truth with its pants down. When Custer asked Jack Crab if he should go down into the valley of Little Big Horn, Crabs response was priceless.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)AngryDem001
(684 posts)don't they?
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)it needs to be managed.
2naSalit
(86,622 posts)many of us that the only population that really needs to be managed according to numbers is that of the human population.
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,542 posts)2naSalit
(86,622 posts)When it comes to wildlife, "management" means "take" which means kill. Just look at the wolf reintroduction saga, best example I can think, second would be bears.
Management for humans could be as simple as educating people a little and some consideration, but that's too sensible.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)CountAllVotes
(20,872 posts)I guess they want to finish the job off, just like they've pretty much done with the native inhabitants of the region!
& recommend!!
packman
(16,296 posts)[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
Did you ever wonder what and how bears hunt? Now this would be sport - arm the bears. Disgusting that all the effort and work to protect them is now being even considered to be removed so that some jackasses with money and time on their hands can go on a guided tour to get a trophy to put in their house.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)more wildlife into livestock/garbage pile scrounging animals.
They_Live
(3,233 posts)k & R
Coventina
(27,120 posts)NO TROPHY HUNTING!!!