Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,657 posts)
Wed May 13, 2015, 11:47 PM May 2015

Train-control system could have prevented crash

Source: Philadelphia Inquirer

Amtrak Train 188 was traveling at more than 100 m.p.h., more than double the speed limit, when it crashed Tuesday night at Frankford Junction, killing at least seven people and injuring about 200, investigators said Wednesday.

The death toll was expected to rise, as emergency crews continued to search for bodies in the mangled wreckage of the seven-car train. About a dozen passengers were still missing.

The deadly derailment could have been prevented if Amtrak had installed an electronic train-control system that is already in place on other parts of its rail network, National Transportation Safety Board member Robert Sumwalt said.

The NTSB has been calling for "positive train control" for years, and federal law requires that it be installed by the end of this year on all passenger railroads and major freight carriers.

Read more: http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20150514_Amtrak_Train_188_lacked_control_system_that_would_have_prevented_deadly_crash.html



As a transportation professional who's worked with Amtrak for years, I can say that delays in PTC implementation are largely driven by woeful underfunding of the RR's capital funding needs going back decades.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

brooklynite

(94,657 posts)
2. Amtrak is publicly owned and funded...
Thu May 14, 2015, 12:11 AM
May 2015

You can argue whether fares and revenues should cover operating costs (they don't) but there's no way Amtrak has the money for capital improvements.

elleng

(131,028 posts)
7. I know Amtrak is publicly owned and funded.
Thu May 14, 2015, 12:34 AM
May 2015

You wrote 'As a transportation professional who's worked with Amtrak for years, I can say that delays in PTC implementation are largely driven by woeful underfunding of the RR's capital funding needs going back decades.'

My question is, from whence came this underfunding? Amtrak's right of way is funded how? Amtrak owns some of it's track, ALL of the track in the NorthEast corridor? but freight carriers own and maintain right of way elsewhere, correct?

It seems that we're (all) still stuck with the mess from the wreck of the Penn Central, and will likely never recover from it. And Congress has no interest in finding a realistic remedy.

BumRushDaShow

(129,228 posts)
11. Plus because
Thu May 14, 2015, 08:04 AM
May 2015

20 of the last 35 years saw Amtrak funding literally slashed and burned, this meant that with the little bit that came in, out it went trying to take care of the "very worst" of the conditions needing repairs before getting chance to hit the "less worse", leaving the rest to eventually degrade. Wash. Rinse. Repeat. I.e., you end up doing reactive planning instead of having the ability to even think of proactive improvements or even modernization.

Warpy

(111,302 posts)
9. Two trains were hit by projectiles
Thu May 14, 2015, 12:54 AM
May 2015

One two miles away from the crash and one four miles away from the crash in the same corridor.

When the engineer and conductor are debriefed, they could very well find out there was a good reason to speed up. Or not.

ETA: http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20150514_SEPTA_train_hit_by_projectile_before_Amtrak_crash.html

Wash. state Desk Jet

(3,426 posts)
12. That notion occurred to me
Thu May 14, 2015, 09:52 AM
May 2015

Urban terrorism is terrorism. If the speed the train was traveling at is not or was not human error/oversight, than why was the train traveling at that speed at that curve is the question remaining. System failure or something else.

The operator/train conductor according to reports has no memory just prior to the train derailment, in the news it says he does not remember anything about it or engaging the emergency breaking system.




jwirr

(39,215 posts)
6. An expert on The Last Word said that there is a mechanism that can be used to override the train
Thu May 14, 2015, 12:33 AM
May 2015

controls. The engineer can dismantle the automatic controls if he wants to because he needs to make up time. Lawrence stopped him and told him that the train was running late. The expert looked absolutely shocked and said "I did not know that until just this minute." It is apparently a big deal.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
8. It boggles my mind that this wasn't installed.
Thu May 14, 2015, 12:41 AM
May 2015

After the Spain crash (that killed 80 people!) it is insane that it wasn't fast tracked and enforced pronto. Funding be damned, it should've been pushed straight through.

neverforget

(9,436 posts)
10. PTC was installed last year on a subdivision of the Pacific Northwest. It failed because
Thu May 14, 2015, 01:05 AM
May 2015

of technical problems like dumping the train (putting it into emergency aka applying all the brakes on the cars) because the map PTC runs off of, suddenly goes blank or literally runs into a wall. It's a great system that just isn't quite ready yet.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Train-control system coul...