Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,252 posts)
Wed May 27, 2015, 01:38 AM May 2015

New Ebola study says a dozen more were hospitalized in Dallas outbreak than was revealed

Source: Dallas Morning News

More people than the public knew were hospitalized for possible Ebola exposure during Dallas’ outbreak, a new study says.

Last fall, only two people were known to be hospitalized here after potentially contracting the often-fatal disease from a Liberian traveler. They were the nurses who tested positive.

At the time, it was not revealed that an additional dozen people, nine of them health care workers, came down with Ebola-like symptoms while being monitored for possible exposure. The report said they developed fevers, headaches, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting or diarrhea.

Without fanfare, the patients were hospitalized for one to five days and released after testing negative for Ebola. Their average stay was 2.5 days.

Read more: http://www.dallasnews.com/news/metro/20150526-new-ebola-study-says-a-dozen-more-were-hospitalized-in-dallas-outbreak-than-was-revealed.ece

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Ebola study says a dozen more were hospitalized in Dallas outbreak than was revealed (Original Post) TexasTowelie May 2015 OP
Free access bananas May 2015 #1
So? The patients had a right to remain anonymous. To release their ID would have led to them being McCamy Taylor May 2015 #2
"possible Ebola" Zight May 2015 #3

bananas

(27,509 posts)
1. Free access
Wed May 27, 2015, 01:53 AM
May 2015
http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2297228

Active Tracing and Monitoring of Contacts Associated With the First Cluster of Ebola in the United States FREE ONLINE FIRST

Wendy M. Chung, MD; Jessica C. Smith, MPH; Lauren M. Weil, PhD, MPH; Sonya M. Hughes, MPH; Sibeso N. Joyner, MPH; Emily M. Hall, MPH; Julia Ritch; Divya Srinath, JD, MPH; Edward Goodman, MD; Michelle S. Chevalier, MD, MPH; Lauren Epstein, MD, MSc; Jennifer C. Hunter, DrPH; Alexander J. Kallen, MD, MPH; Mateusz P. Karwowski, MD, MPH; David T. Kuhar, MD; Charnetta Smith, MD; Lyle R. Petersen, MD, MPH; Barbara E. Mahon, MD, MPH; David L. Lakey, MD; and Stephanie J. Schrag, DPhil

Ann Intern Med. Published online 26 May 2015 doi:10.7326/M15-0968


McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
2. So? The patients had a right to remain anonymous. To release their ID would have led to them being
Wed May 27, 2015, 02:41 PM
May 2015

ostracized--even if the tests came back negative, because folks would have said "That person was exposed. What if they come down with the disease later. He should be kicked out of my apartment complex."

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New Ebola study says a do...