Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker Wouldn't Rule Out Re-Invasion of Iraq
Source: ABC News
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker says he wouldnt rule out a full-blown re-invasion of Iraq if he were to become the next commander-in-chief.
The likely Republican presidential candidate and early frontrunner in several polls said he would consider a re-invasion if it were deemed necessary to protect American national security at home and abroad.
"It would not be limited to anything out there," Walker told ABC's Jonathan Karl in an exclusive interview with for This Week. "Once we start saying how far we're willing to go or how many troops we're willing to invest, we send a horrible message, particularly to foes in the Middle East who are willing to wait us out." . . .
Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wisconsin-gov-scott-walker-rule-invasion-iraq/story?id=31590709
Because it worked out so well the first time . . .
StevieM
(10,500 posts)dropped the ball and gave victory back to the enemy.
cstanleytech
(26,294 posts)expect any president to paint themselves into such a corner.
That aside Walker as president would be as bad if not worse than Bush imo and the rest of the clown car republicans arent much better.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)At first, I questioned the idea of invading a country where we already have occupying military forces, but then I realized this fits in with the Republican notion that the president has "abandoned" Iraq and turned it over to ISIS. If Walker wants to invade something, he should start small, the Michigan Upper Peninsula.
Faygo Kid
(21,478 posts)Yoopers would fight back by hurling the best-tasting pasties in the world at the cheesehead invaders, and a good meal would be had by all.
jmowreader
(50,559 posts)Which is that there's such a thing as a good-tasting pasty.
edbermac
(15,941 posts)As long as he's leading the way.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)PALETES of money dropped from planes.
Hundreds of tanks.
Thousands of armored Humvees.
Go in and build billions worth of facilities.
Kill off tens of thousands of people.
Sure! I'll bet Iraqi leadership will work it different this time, making sure they personally get their hand on some stuff.
Say, what happened to paying for Iraqi War I, with all that revenue from OIL?
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)He doesn't want to lose his place among the hardest of the hard right contenders now, does he.
marble falls
(57,105 posts)pinto
(106,886 posts)or whatever iteration another boots on the ground operation there would be.
I've no clue as to what a "solution" to the convoluted multi factional civil wars in the region would look like, but another military intervention is not one I support.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Send him alone. People are getting fed up of Iraq nonsense.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)Would be not appearing as heavily armed psychopath of a country.
This will not be part of any platform adopted by this Koch addicted sycophantic moral gumby of a presidental not-yet candidate.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)What does he mean by "a full blown re-invasion" of Iraq. You invade for the purpose of conquering a country to remove the current government. We deposed of Saddam in that manner. And if this is where he stands on Iraq, where does he stand on Syria? Invade them at the same time. Will he start up the draft again in order to find the troops to fight these endless wars. Lastly, isn't "deepening" the same thing as to "bone up"? Stay tuned tomorrow for the walk-back as this interview was a disaster on all levels.
City Lights
(25,171 posts)Or else he's just another chickenhawk Republican willing to send someone else's kids off to die for the MIC.
lastlib
(23,247 posts)from the REAR, where ALL the chickenhawks "lead" from. Put themselves or their own kids in harm's way? Not a frickin' chance of it. Profit from it?? (Is the Pope Catholic?)
olddad56
(5,732 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)next to of course god america i
love you land of the pilgrims and so forth oh
say can you see by the dawns early my
country tis of centuries come and go
and are no more what of it we should worry
in every language even deafanddumb
thy sons acclaim your glorious name by gorry
by jingo by gee by gosh by gum
why talk of beauty what could be more beaut-
iful than these heroic happy dead
who rushed like lions to the roaring slaughter
they did not stop to think they died instead
then shall the voice of liberty be mute?
He spoke. And drank rapidly a glass of water
--e. e. cummings
SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)WTF
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)Walker's answer to any spontaneous question will be that all possibilities are open, because he doesn't know what the Koch's want his opinion to be.
Turbineguy
(37,343 posts)But I guess his handlers told him to leave that bit alone until after he got in.
Vinca
(50,278 posts)the kids of those "other people" who get to go?
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)Sancho
(9,070 posts)I suppose the History channel gave him the idea with all that Texas stuff.
louis-t
(23,295 posts)warmongers.
Judi Lynn
(160,545 posts)Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)Thinking of all the pro-war rally money he can make from another round of "Proud to be an Amurican" performances.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)jmowreader
(50,559 posts)If he's willing to conscript every military-age person related to any member of a Republican club, Tea Party club or any other war-loving group, and everyone caught with a "Choose Life" license plate or "If you can't stand behind our troops, feel free to stand in front of them" bumper sticker...naah, even if he was perfectly willing to stick everyone who loves war into the ranks and ship them to the box right now, I wouldn't support this.
OTOH, I WOULD support sending some container ships and airliners to the Middle East to evacuate any US civilians who want to get the hell out.